Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Am in the middle of selling my house but it's been held up as still showing a change on the property from welcome finance, have not had any contact from them for years or prime credit and need this sorting asap
    • Evening all looking for bit of advice again , currently doing my own debt management , but think may have burgered up on 1 of the creditors (creation loan) had got sold to Intrum around nov 23 and havent paid anything to it since then , it never went to default ( I thought it did  , now checking credit file , intrum is there and says 1 missed payment and doesnt say account defaulted can i let that go and intrum will default it? hope that makes sense what i have said
    • Hi. You've left the PCN number on the 22nd March letter and your name on the one below that. It's best to cover those up please. HB
    • 1 Date of the infringement 14/02/24   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 21/02/24   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received 23/02/24   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A   7 Who is the parking company? Euro Car Parks   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] St Nicholas Street, Weymouth   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. POPLA / BPA   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here -Final Notification Letter from Euro Car Parks -Warning Of Legal Proceedings Letter from Debt Recovery Plus   Please can anyone advise on how to proceed from this point? I've read a number of threads about snotty letters etc but with the fact it's gone straight to a debt recovery company i doubt a snotty letter will get me anywhere. Is it just a case of waiting for a potential claim to come through or is there something i can be researching / doing in the iterim from this point forward? Many thanks, MDG convert-jpg-to-pdf.net_2024-05-02_17-59-16.pdf
    • wont remove the rest k , it was a joint vol charge. both your names are on the charge too.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA request to Moorcroft


music-man
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4221 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wonder if anyone can help?

 

Moorcroft Debt Recovery are pursuing me for 2 debts owed to NatWest (overdraft and bank loan).....they have amalgamated them into one claim.

 

I sent a CCA request & a postal order for £1 by recorded delivery on 21/09/2012

 

they wrote to me on 8/10/2012 offering a 25% discount on my debt if I paid within 3 months but did not mention the CCA request.

 

I checked with the Post office and they delivered my CCA request letter on 25/09/2012...unfortunately I did not keep a record of the postal order so I can't check if it has been cashed.

 

what should I do now?

 

Thank you in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi welcome to CAG, CCA 12 +2 Working days to reply so just over time.

There is no CCA 74 regulated a agreement for an overdraft I don't think it's

reasonable for them to consolidate the 2 debts.

 

Send the CCA failure letter from the CAG library.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worth a check on your credit file. HSBC seemingly set off the balance of a loan to my current (overdrawn) account and then sold it to a DCA.

 

Said DCA is still reporting on the two separate accounts on my CRA but collecting on one reference number.

 

So I am expecting a letter claiming exemption for the overdraft but the CCA for the loan.

 

The account(s?) is in dispute anyway as they failed to provide anything against the request in June. I do get a letter now and then reminding me that they are referring to the OC for my agreement...

Link to post
Share on other sites

It all depends when these accounts and overdraft were taken out whether or not you can use the lack of an agreement containing all the prescribed terms to defend against any potential court claim. The relevant date is 6 April 2007, this was when ss127(3) and (4) of the CCA 1974 were repealed.

 

Regarding the overdraft, for the bank to be able to claim exemption from having to comply with Part V of the CCA 1974 regarding properly executed agreements it must be able to show that it has complied with all the conditions set out in the directive issued by the Director of the Office of Fair Trading. One of those conditions relates to the bank issuing to you 'Letters of Facility' for the overdraft - if they can't show they have done so then they are not exempt and must produce an agreement containing all the prescribed terms.

 

To find out whether they have copies of these letters (if any) your best bet would be to SAR them.

 

For a better understanding of what I am getting at read my thread here; http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?241052-Irwin-Mitchell-NastyWest-overdraft-claim-***-Won-With-Costs***

 

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

discount = something smells

 

prob PENALTY charges

 

or no paperwork

 

check your cra file too.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again....I have looked on "credit expert" and although Moorcroft are claiming a consolidated amount my credit file shows they are still listed as a defaulted bank loan and defaulted overdraft.

 

The overdraft facility came with the NatWest account I opened in 1986 - the NatWest loan was taken out in Feb 2008

 

I will now read the information on your link

Link to post
Share on other sites

whos names is against those accounts

 

DCA or bank

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore MH then

 

they dont even own the debts

so cant do anything .

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing

 

they are a dca they have NO LEGAL POWERS!!

 

they are NOT BAILIFFS

 

toothless idiots

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...