Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3861 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ok just re read things

 

this account is still open

 

look at the last statement [as recent as you can]

 

find the APR [not the monthly rate]

p'haps listed as purchase rate?

 

put that in cell D15

forget about the old rates.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 421
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

you say above DCA is still chasing?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so in the last XXX years have you any indication that interest has been charged?

 

if not

set the claim to date to the date of the termination of the account by haliprats.

 

does the bal at Termination equal the bal being chased currently

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so in the last XXX years have you any indication that interest has been charged?

 

if not

set the claim to date to the date of the termination of the account by haliprats.

 

does the bal at Termination equal the bal being chased currently

 

dx

 

No interest since 2008..Yep the balance at Termination is the same has now..account open 2001 ended 2008..PPI 2001 to 2005

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok

set the claim to date box on the CISHEET to that date.

 

note the total that that gives you

 

take that total and the date of termination...

 

put it into this spreadsheet. using the tem date as the date.

 

StatIntSheet v101.xls

 

that will give you the 8% statutory interest you are entitled to

 

as you've been deprived of that money

from the date of termination [no interest charged from their side]

 

to the date your PPI claim is settled.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said my maths is not a strong point..Ive added up all the PPI from 2001 to 2005..the total is £1,401.40,,do I add 8% on to that total..? If so what would it be ? It says Monthly PPI amount ..my amount was different every month ..What do I put there? Sorry to be a pain

 

Thanks DX

Edited by babydoll0141917
Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to input EVERY payment of PPI

on its date

individually on a new row

 

in the spreadsheet.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX..Ive wrote them all on paper they are all ready to go on spread sheet..will the 8% be worked out for me ..Or will I have to do it? If I have to do it I will have to give you a shout :)..also when I added account number to Spread sheet ..It changed once I moved down to the next bit ..Is it suppose to do that ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

we'll do the 8% on another sheet later

 

shouldn't change the account number as that's a text box.

 

you are using excel not open office.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

find their last int rate they charged your [purchase rate]

 

put that in cell d 15 [white box next to int rate / apr]

 

that should make the sheet calculated the rate on the last col

for all your rows.

 

you should now have three figures in the boxes top right in bold.

 

yes

 

attach the sheet back to me here

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks So much DX ..the only one I could find was on A 2001 statement at 17.9% so Ive use that ..Its was prob a lot more by 2008 ...Yes I have a calculation on the right hand side :)..do I pm you and attach it to that ? so you can see

 

Also my Account number still changes ..would I be puting the card number down for the account or the PPI account number

Edited by babydoll0141917
Link to post
Share on other sites

attach it here.go advanced/manage attachment bottom right

 

there must be amore recent apr than the surely?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe on the T and Cs for 2008 ..there maybe another intrest rate ?

 

On the 2008 T and Cs it does say THE APR FOR THE AGREEMENT IS 23.5% APR (VARIABLE)

 

Shall I change it to that ?

 

Ill send now so you can have a look ..It still has the 17.9% INT on it

Edited by babydoll0141917
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Babydoll,

just been reading your thread as I have a similar situation with the Halifax CCA,

it looks the same as yours with a pasted version of some terms on the back.

 

I did complain to Halifax telling them that I thought it was unenforceable as non compliant.

 

They wrote back saying that what they had supplied was correct etc etc and that they had answered my comlplaint. That was in 2010.

 

They then passed the file onto Connaught, 1st Credit and its now gone to Mackenzie Hall.

 

As I sent them the bemused letter,

they have sent me all the bumf again,

copy statements, copy of the app form, with photo copy back, copy of letters sent to prev dca's.

 

I don't know what to send back as they know the reason it's in dispute!

 

Any advice would be much appreciated.

 

Feeling a bit battered and blue with this one :o( xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi livis...I just keep telling 1st credit .. the T and Cs are illegible.

.and I don't pay any money to any person or organisation unless they can show they have a legal right to ask for it or collect it...

.. they know why im disputing

 

..I send a letter they send one back asking for my comments

..Letter ping pong :)..

 

.Every time I have a concern they put the account on hold.

 

.Why keep doing that if the APP is enforceable .

.think they think im gonna crumble and start paying .

 

...1st cred also think the Tand Cs are unreadable and unenforceable as I have print outs from the SARS that they have said that

and asked Halifax to buy the debt back .

.but of course Halifax refused

 

Also my DN is invalid ..but 1stcred don't know that :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe on the T and Cs for 2008 ..there maybe another intrest rate ?

 

On the 2008 T and Cs it does say THE APR FOR THE AGREEMENT IS 23.5% APR (VARIABLE)

 

Shall I change it to that ?

 

Ill send now so you can have a look ..It still has the 17.9% INT on it

 

yes use that 23.5

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...