Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • As with other posts here. IGNORE completely.  
    • Welcome to the forum. I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum please continue to post here.   Andy
    • Interesting. Thanks for that London.  That’s what I’m gathering.     iv no doubt they would send me fake documents but would they really dare present fake documents to a court of law?
    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3850 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Yes your local TS. If you send it to the area where the creditor is based it will only get forwarded to your local one anyway from my experience.

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 421
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

if they intend to go to court then you can make them look totally silly by defending the claim and asking for everything under the Civil procedures rules, i've never got a far as court, they seem to be refusing to oblige me but if they do someone on here can help you more with that.

Odds on when you defend they'll back down and you win by default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi every 1 ..well today i received a CCA after 8mths ..this was sent by IQOR who are collecting on behalf of BOS..could any1 tell me if its enforceble or not ..if you cant see it proper i will get my son to scan tomorra..i have the front that looks like its an application form and on the back is the T and C..the code on the front is not the same as the code on reverse..thanks every 1 :)

http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s168/lisa5_01/P1010060-1.jpg

http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s168/lisa5_01/P1010057.jpg

 

hope the photo bucket worked...

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi guys

 

after 8 mths and after iqor are collectin on behalf of halifax this is the CCa they have sent me ...this is all they sent me :)..the first is the front page the 2nd was on the reverse of the front page ..im not sure if the reverse has been copied on to the front ..the code at the bottom of the front doesnt match the code on the reverse,,the bank havent signed it ..i received no other correspondance with this CCa was i meant to ??..also could this CCa be enforcable ..thanks

 

http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s168/lisa5_01/P1010060-1.jpg

http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s168/lisa5_01/P1010057.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've blown it up to a bigger size in Paint.NET, but then it just loses clarity. I can see that the letters "APR" are included as part of point 7, but I can't see enough of the text to make anything else out.

 

Is the copy you've got legible?

 

Also, when was the card taken out? The date in the box looks like 4/9/01, but at the top it looks like 30/8/07.

 

SH

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi whats legible mean ?? aving a blonde moment ..and card was taken out in o1 ..i did wonder what the 30/8/07 was about..im about to put the doc on again ..see if you can read it this time

 

cheers SH:)

http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s168/lisa5_01/Image3.jpg..my son has done this for me ..hope it works .he doing a networking degree :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

well every 1 that has read this post is possibly thinking the same as me ...that u cant read the T & cs on the reverse of this CCa ..would it be better for me to type up the required T & Cs so u can have a better look ?? i really need to know what to do about this CCA..??

 

1st ..the two codes on front and reverse dont match,,2nd after the sig there is another box stating ( my rights to cancel) saying they will be sent to me ...yet on the back it has another rights to cancel saying if i want to cancel the need written confirmation!! mmm contradicting them selfs ..

 

i have my suspitions about this CCa ...could some1 pls tell me what the prescribe terms are that are needed and i will type them up ..many thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

just found out its enforcable ..looks like a SAR will be on its way ..i know i have over a 1000 pounds of charges ..then i will pay them 5 pounds a mth ..im unemployed live in rented accommodation ..my boyfriend is gonna give me 5 pounds to pay them ..if they want more ..tough lol:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are the prescribed terms, they must be within the document you signed and cannot be found elsewhere.

 

17. The prescribed terms referred to are contained in schedule 6 column 2 of the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) and are inter alia: - A term stating the credit limit or the manner in which it will be determined or that there is no credit limit, A term stating the rate of any interest on the credit to be provided under the agreement and A term stating how the debtor is to discharge his obligations under the agreement to make the repayments, which may be expressed by reference to a combination of any of the following--

1. Number of repayments;

2. Amount of repayments;

3. Frequency and timing of repayments;

4. Dates of repayments;

5. The manner in which any of the above may be determined; or in any other way, and any power of the creditor to vary what is payable

 

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scan 1 in post 1 contains no prescribed terms, and even says the terms are in another document (not acceptable).

 

Scan 2, There is nothing to say this is part of the document you signed, so is irrelevant IMHO.

  • Haha 1

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks CCM..

so what ure saying this could be unenforable??.

.i agree with what u are saying there .

..the 2 references dont match ..

and nothing on 1 says there is T & C on 2

 

..i will put in the T & C that u have asked in my nxt post

..it does say (we will set a credit limit and tell u what it is,and we can change cred limit at any time and inform me of what it is .

 

.it says they will send regular statements showin the payments i have made ,

,and all the amounts they have charged.

.says i will have to payminimum of 5.00or 2%of the total amount i owe.

 

.and my statement will show the smallest amount i have to pay and the date that it is due

....doesnt give any date of repayments !!

 

then says they will charge intrest there are APRs for balance transfres cheques and cash advances.

.it does look like a cut and paste to me.

.any1 can do that ..!!

wot im baffiled with is on the sig Doc it says my cancellation rights will be sent to me .

.on the reverse on the Conditions O use

 

..its says if i wanna cancell they need written confermation

..the print is so small,

,my eye sight aint good but it aint that bad either and im still struggling to read it :)

..im goona click ure scales /..cheers hunni u a gem

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, send them this, IQOR are idiots this should make them disappear back under their stone, and send the thing back to the OC.

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Account no xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

 

Re: my request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

This account is in Dispute .

 

On xx/xx/2007 I wrote to xxxxxxxxx requesting that xxxxxxx supply me a true copy of the executed credit agreement for this account.

In response to this request I was supplied a mere application form which did not comply with the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The document sent purporting to be a credit agreement does not contain any of the prescribed terms as required by section 60(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974. The Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) made under the authority of the “1974 Act” sets out what the prescribed terms are, I refer you to Schedule 6 Column 2 of SI 1983/1553 for the definition of what is required. Suffice to say none of the terms are present in the document

 

Since this document does not contain the required prescribed terms it is rendered unenforceable by s127 (3) consumer Credit Act 1974, which states

 

127(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a)(signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

 

This situation is backed by case law from the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary (House of Lords) the highest court in the land. Your attention is drawn to the authority of the House of Lords in Wilson-v- FCT [2003] All ER (D) 187 (Jul) which confirms that where a document does not contain the required terms under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 the agreement cannot be enforced.

 

In addition should you continue to pursue me for this debt you will be in breach of the OFT guidelines, I draw your attention to the Office of Fair Trading’s guidance on debt collection

The OFT guidance which was issued July 2003 (updated December 2006) relating to debt collections and what the OFT considers unfair, I have enclosed an excerpt from page 5 of the guidance which states

 

2.6 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

 

h. Ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment

 

I require you to produce a compliant copy of my credit agreement to confirm I am liable to you or any organisation, which you represent for this alleged debt, if you cannot do so I require written clarification that this is the case. Should you ignore this request I will report you to the Office of Fair Trading to consider your suitability to hold a credit licence in addition to a complaint to Trading Standards, as you will be in breach of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40

 

Since the agreement is unenforceable and the default notice is non compliant, it would be in everyone’s interest to consider the matter closed and for your client to write the debt off. I suggest you give serious consideration to this as any attempt of litigation will be vigorously defended and I will counter claim for all quantifiable damages

 

I respectfully request a response to this letter in 14 days

 

 

I trust this out lines the situation

__________________

 

 

 

 

Head the letter

 

 

 

I Do Not Acknowledge Any Debt To Your Company or Any Company You Claim To Represent

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

aww fanx CCM ...

another tick is comming ure way :).

.are u saying that the agreement they have sent is unenforcable

tho at the mo ( bet the original wudnt have copyin and pasteing on the back )??

 

becoz others are saying it its not .

 

Not on mine but on the same DOCs that another CAG member has( i will try and find the link then send u ..its in the halifax forum) .

 

...Thanks i wudnt of said it was unreadable .

.but so small i need a magnify to save my eye site ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...