Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
    • President Ruto says Kenyans pay less tax than citizens in some other African countries.View the full article
    • As PM Sunak really showed his true colours at the D Day Commemorations by doing what? Oh I am the British PM lets just leave early I have better things to do and as he is called out on disrespecting all those veterans that served our country for the freedoms we have today he gives a groveling apology to little to late. He knew about this event for a long time and also knew that this is probably the last D Day Commemoration due to the age of those Veterans who gave so much for there countries freedom. Even on the day of the D Day Commemoration he still could have changed his plans As PM and stayed but choose not to showing such DISRESPECT to those Veterans, those that lost there lives and Families for the Freedoms we have today Being a Veteran myself I have never known a PM to show such disrespect what the hell was he thinking SHAME ON YOU PM SUNAK  
    • Thanks. We'll try to help over the weekend. If the hearing is on 05/07 then it's 90% sure that the deadline for filing your WS is 21/06.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Child protection problems in nhs


Jonanon89
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4254 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Last end March (2011) I was concerned about the behaviour of a member of staff on the Teenage Cancer Trust Unit at the University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff. I do not want to identify the member of staff except that it was a Nursing Auxiliary on the ward as I do not think that this is the point of what I would like to say here.

I was concerned about the member of staff's behaviour on the ward as the staff member behaved inappropriately at times with members of senior staff and patients. The Nursing Auxiliary was overly familiar with patients and said inappropriate things to them.

 

What is particularly disturbing is that the Nursing Auxiliary attended a trip and there were child protection concerns with regard to the member of staff on the trip. I heard that the member of staff got drunk with and spent time in patient's aged under 18's rooms.

 

I heard that the Nursing Auxiliary's behaviour was reported to the Ward Sister edit and Service Manager edit and the child protection concerns and drunkness were reported at that time.

 

However, I remember seeing the Nursing Auxiliary on the ward throughout April and then I was told he was off sick and I never saw the staff member again. Therefore why was the staff member allowed to be on the ward when there were child protection concerns. Surely there should have been some investigations before the staff member returned to the ward.

 

What is more, I have noticed that edit is now working for Teenage Cancer Trust itself in a very responsible job. It seems strange that she allowed someone that child protection concerns had been raised about to work on a ward with vulnerable teenagers and then get a promotion?

Edited by freakyleaky
Removed staff names
Link to post
Share on other sites

There should be someone with responsibility for child protection/safeguarding within the hospital. If you have concerns this is the person that the concern should be referred to. I worked in CP and all our local hospitals had a named person. Any concern should be investigated appropriately.

 

All organisations need a CP Policy if they deal with anyone under the aged 17 and under and the process for reporting concerns should be contained within this policy.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

With the greatest respect Jonanon89, everyone who works with children in Hospital has training on Child Protection on a regular basis as part of the Mandatory training programme.

Without knowing the context of the concerns you mention any reports made against staff would be investigated fully.

 

As a visitor to a hospital if you witness a concern then it should be reported at that time to the Senior Nurse in charge.

This will allow for the maximum of information that can be taken.

Keep up the fight against Bank Charges.

 

 

Got Debt problems?

Don't panic, put the kettle on and read this

 

:-) Everything I write comes from my heart and head! The large filling cabinet that is my knowledge of life, however warped that may be!! :-)

 

<<< Please tickle my star!! if I have managed to help you or just made you chuckle!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite right Nolegion.

 

It would seem that Jonanon89 did not report his/her concerns re. the auxiliary.

 

It could be that the management remain unaware of the auxiliary's inappropriate behaviour with patients.

 

I know it may seem weasley to snitch on a former colleague, but I believe the OP should still act. I don't know what role the promoted ex-auxiliary is in now and whether it involves interaction with patients or whether it could do in the future.

 

These patients were vulnerable by both their age and their health.

 

We have seen enough incidents and scandals bubble to the surface to realise that 'the system' often turns out to have more holes in than a string vest and the commonsense of those in responsible positions seems to have gone AWOL.

 

I am conscious that many whistleblowers become victims and wonder whether it is possible to report your concerns anonymously Jonanon89. I would almost suggest that you do this to more than one party - the senior nurse, their current manager and whomever else you deem appropriate - in the hope that at least one of them takes the matter seriously.

 

Terry Bryan was the hero in the Winterbourne scandal. If he hadn't persisted in reporting his concerns about the mistreatment of vulnerable adults to the management, to the senior management, to the CQC (3 times) and finally to the only people who took notice, Panorama, it may very well be continuing to this day.

 

Reading some of the reports of Savile's (I should say alleged) victims it is obvious that the years have not eased their suffering.

 

It's your call.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...