Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lowells statutory demand - **SUCCESSFULLY SET ASIDE - PLUS COSTS ** CHEQUE RECEIVED NOW **


d33
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4155 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

up to you, you said before that the current cred who has issued demand said they cannot provide required docs?

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

2 problems submitting my set aside forms yesterday :

 

went to the court yesterday, despite it being the one on the demand letter, it was the wrong court, and despite being told on the phone by someone from the court that i yesterday would be within the timescale (as the 18th day was a weekend), it appears this is wrong, even though the person checked with 3 people :roll:

 

I was told i would have to pay £35 enter another form explaining why for was being entered late, so i wrote 'wrong court put on the demand' i posted recorded delivery yesterday.

 

It seems these companies are deliberately entering wrong courts to confuse things,when people are trying to set aside, i dint get a chance to mention this on my statement, but will at the hearing

Link to post
Share on other sites

i did mention that weekends would be inclusive! ie calender days.

anyway, yes use all that re lateness albeit a couple of days. hopefully a hearing will be set where it will all be heard, including the lateness. afaik, reason for any lateness can be entered on the same sd set aside form.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received a letter back to day saying application to extend time for bringing the application to set aside was stood over by judge *****.

1) application needs to be amended to make application to extend time in which to apply to set aside.

 

2)the written evidence in support of application needs to state the reason for making the application out of time.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

they havent sent back any paperwork, they have cashed the £35 cheque and i clearly stated on the form which was stamped by the clerk, that the reason was for being late was they had put the wrong court on the demand. Any ideas what i do now? does this mean i have to go all the way to the court to refill in this one form again? this is dragging on

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can set out the events exactly as they happened

 

SD was dated 11th Spetember

Received by you via normal post 2nd October

You submitted your 6.4 and 6.5 and accompanying documents on (date)

 

You can even state that you believe the creditor is deliberately attempting to abuse the process by not having made any attempt at personal service and then posting it to the defendant without any time to allow a set aside at all...

 

And claim your flipping costs back.....

 

It wouldn't be the first time they had abused the process !! there is another thread on here where the creditor appeared at a hearing and had not even served the petition !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the demand was delivered by the process server around 3 weeks after the date on the demand, ( from what i have read, the date of delivery is what counts)?, also on the late form stamped by the clerk at the court i put down that the wrong court was on the demand(didnt mention that they were deliberately trying to deceive me though)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: lowells statutory demand

 

re #56, did they send that re form 6.5 or that 'extra' form you did?

 

the letter is vague, i think i will ring the clerk tomorrow to find out exactly what i need to do

Link to post
Share on other sites

i didnt put anything, because when i turned up to the court i thought i was at the right one and i was within the 18 days( i spoke to a court clerk the friday previous, who sounded like they were on work experience, to put it kindly who checked with 3 people that i would be in time if i submitted on the monday. On the monday i was told i was at the wrong court and i was given wrong information about the time to submit

Link to post
Share on other sites

i didnt put anything, ..

 

hence poss why #56! at least j has given further time to explain. could also refer j to that extra app'n you did?

as suggested, any app'n out of time needs to be explained, and extension requested, on 6.5.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

well, could include all this in your reasons and also refer to this 'extra' form that you were told to do

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

order says an 'amendment'? as 42man says, could just involve an additional/addendum. double check with court whats required, post back re what they say.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

the hearing date is set for next month. Just wondering what i need to prepare myself for, the judge i assume will have read through the statement, what i have sent is quite detailed.

 

will they just read through it and ask me questions, what sort of questions are they likely to ask?

i havent heard anything back from lowells regarding the set aside application, is quite likely that they wont turn up ?

Edited by d33
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...