Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The important thing to know is that MET - although they will send you threat after threat about how they will divert a drone from Ukraine and make it fall on your home - hardly ever do court. Even in the very small number of cases where they send court papers, if the Cagger defends, they drop the matter before the hearing.  They have no real intention of putting their rubbish claim before a judge.  The aim is to find motorists who are terrified of the idea of going to court and who will give in when the court papers arrive. Thanks for doing the sticky and well done on finding F18's thread.  Do what they did.  On the first page - I think post 19 - there is the address of the CEO of BP.  Write to them, lay it on thick about being genuine customers in the various premises, mention the small kids, the very short stay time, attach any proof of purchase - and request that they get the invoice cancelled.
    • Thank you for that, I have obviously already been convicted so I think the appeal lodged is for the previous offence? Sorry if that doesn’t make sense. I suppose my only concern is that weds I go there and they don’t let a stat dec happen. If they do then as you say and solicitor says it’s highly likely I’ll be happy with the outcome. But I’m being told there’s no guarantee for the stat dec to be hard Weds as that’s not what the hearing is proposed for. Solicitor has stated that you can put a stat dec before a magistrates at any time so it shouldn’t be a problem.   
    • I re-read the extract from your  solicitor's letter this morning and think I might understand what they have in mind. I believe (and it’s only a guess) their strategy is this: 1.    You will make your SD 2.    You will enter fresh pleas to the four charges (not guilty) but will offer to plead guilty to speeding on the understanding that the FtP charges are dropped. 3.    If this is accepted they will attempt to argue that the two offences were committed “on the same occasion” 4.    You will be sentenced for those two offences (the sentence depending on whether the “same occasion” argument succeeds). They also have a plan in the event that your offer at (2) is unsuccessful and you are convicted again of the 2xFtP charges (and so face disqualification under “totting up”): 5.    They will make an “exceptional hardship” argument to avoid a ban. 6.    If that is unsuccessful they have already lodged an appeal in the Crown Court against that decision. (This is the only “appeal” I can think of). 7.    They plan to ask the court to suspend your ban pending that appeal. If I’m correct, I’m surprised the Crown Court has agreed to accept a speculative appeal (against something that hasn’t happened). The solicitor says this is to lodge it within the normal timescales. But you will have 21 days from the date of your conviction (which will be next Wednesday) to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court, so there is no need for a speculative appeal. I have to say that an application to have your ban suspended pending an appeal is unlikely to succeed. The Magistrates Court is unlikely to agree to it for one very good reason: if they make such an order (suspending your ban until your appeal is heard), all you need to do is not to pursue the appeal and the Magistrates order suspending your ban will remain in place. Hey Presto! No ban and no need for you to trouble with an appeal. Perhaps he will ask for your ban to be suspended for (say) three months or until your appeal is heard (whichever occurs first). This potentially creates a problem because if your appeal is not heard in that time either your ban will kick in or you will have o go back to court to get the suspension extended. But the solicitor obviously knows more about these things than I do. I would want to be very clear about this solicitor’s fees and what he proposes to charge you for. As I said, there is absolutely no need to lodge an appeal with the Crown Court. That can be done if and when it becomes required. But I am still firmly of the opinion that it is overwhelmingly likely that you will not need to progress beyond point 2 above. Point 3 is optional and I don’t know whether he solicitor has made It clear to you that the only thing you will avoid in the event of success is three penalty points. You will still be fined for the second offence and your driving record will still be endorsed with the details, but no penalty points will be imposed. Do let us know how it goes.  
    • I'm really trying, but worst case I can't find what are my options?
    • John Lewis' Privacy Notice states that their CCTV Systems does not use facial recognition or collect biometric data - so I assume it should be fine?    Thank you a lot for your reply. I've scheduled my first therapy session ne t week. Really the time to turn my life around..
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

**ANOTHER** Lloyds TSB **WINNER!**


nearlythere
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6248 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi. After reading your site for the last few months regarding various issues decide to take some action regarding Lloyds TSB and charges. Sent a letter in asking for breakdown of charges over last 6 years (received) and subsequently asked for repayment of charges.

Have received back from them what looks like a standard response saying they'll respond again within two weeks to my complaint etc.

Have now drafted the 'letter before action' asking for the £2667 they have taken from me. Is it best to address the letter to the person who has previously responded to me or not? Do I have to take into account weekends when stating the 14 day response time?

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi there - If you have the name of a real person rather than just a department I would continue correspondance with them. Be sure to keep copies of whatever you send anyway. It would be forwarded to the right person if the address you used wasn't right.

As far as I understand you don't count weekends - its days to reply, not working days. Remember you're in charge here, not them :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, Ellie was correct in all she said, the only thing I would like to add is please make sure that you have sent your schedule of charges with your letters! (I am assuming you havent as you didnt put that in your post but you probably have so apologies if you have done so! )

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi. Its now been 14 days since I sent my LBA to LLoyds Tsb in Birmingham and have had no response to this. Have now done the spreadsheet claiming the 8% interest and its added a further £900 to an amount that was £2600. Does this sound about right? I am claiming from August 2000 up until now.

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds right. Mine was £450 on £3000 but over 2 and a half years.

HSBC

7th October 2006 - Prelim for £3078

24th October - LBA

7th November - Claim filed

11th November - Acknowledged with intent to defend

11th December - Defence filed

16th December 2006 - Offered full amount but no default removal. Rejection letter sent.

 

Halifax

7th October 2006 - Prelim for £3427

24th October - LBA

3rd November - Offered £913

3rd November - Accepted as partial payment

7th November - Claim issued

21st November - Acknowledged with intent to defend

11th December - Offered full amount but no late payment removal

4th January - SETTLED + removed adverse credit info

 

A & L

19th October - Prelim for £540

26th October - Offered £358

2nd November - Accepted as partial payment and LBA

27th November - SETTLED + removed adverse credit info

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Have started to complete the MCOL with the 8% interest added. Do I need to send the bank a further copy of the revised spreadsheet showing how the amount claimed is made up or will they see from the money claim form that 8% interest has been added? My original requests for £2669 over the last six years and with the interest it has increased by nearly £800. Have sent the informal request for repayment and the letter before action over the last 4-5 weeks with no obvious favourable reply.

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Hi. Have completed the MCOL form but just wandered about the wording in the particulars of claim. Have quoted account number, date opened, amount in dispute including statutory interest and briefly stating that the charges are unfair etc. and that they relate to excess fees, letters, unauthorised o/d etc. Is there any 'legal speak' that I need to include in the particulars of claim. Dont want to have it knocked back because of how unclear or vague it is, like some others have.

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The correct particulars when filing through MCOL are as follows:-

 

1. The Claimant has an account 1234567 with the Defendant, opened May 2000 2. Since 01/02/03 the Defendant debited charges and interest in respect of purported breaches of contract. 3. Defendant is aware of all details as a list of charges has already been supplied. Another copy will be sent. 4. Claimant contends: (a) The charges exceed the Defendant's losses caused by the breaches; (b) The Term permitting the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and at Common Law. 5. Claimant claims: (a) return of the amounts debited of £XXXX; (b) Interest per S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of 8% - £xxx [enter interest total at date of claim] continuing at 8% until judgment or settlement at a daily rate of £0.xx; 6. Alternatively, if the charges are a fee for a service, then they must be reasonable under S.15 of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982. 7. Costs allowed by the Court.

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres a cover to send your schedule (2 copies);

 

(YOUR ADDRESS)

 

 

 

The Court Manager

Money Claim Online

Northampton County Court

21-27 St Katherine’s Street

Northampton

NN1 2LH

 

(DATE)

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

(YOU) –v- (BANK)

Claim No: ********

 

I have today requested the issue of a County Court claim via the Moneyclaim online service, details as above.

 

Please find enclosed a schedule of the money taken from me by the defendant bank by way of charges, along with interest claimed at the annual rate of 8% pursuant to section 69 of the County Court Act. The interest in addition to the amount in charges equates to the total amount of my claim, namely £(AMOUNT).

 

I respectfully request that the enclosed schedule should be attached with the particulars of my claim.

 

 

Yours Faithfully

 

(YOU)

 

 

If you use the correct POC as posted above and send the schedule to MCOL you should'nt get the "too vague" defence. Even if you did, it would'nt carry any weight.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

N1 is better yes. You've got as much room as you need for more elaberate POC and you can attach the schedule there and then. That said, MCOL is acceptable providing you follow the above criteria.

Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!

 

 

Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like Gary has stated the N1 allows you elaborate your POC, which in my view is better in the long run.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/681-4-particulars-claim-n1.html

IF MY COMMENTS HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Don't be like the banks - give a little back

 

 

:D NAT WEST - WON - £4282.36:D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that there is a six year limit as to when you can claim from but I started my claim in September, therefore claiming from September 2000. Since then I have had 2 or 3 charges put on in October and November of this year. When completing my N1 form and submitting my schedule of charges do I have to amend the claim dates - from September 2000 to September 2006, changed to December 2000 to December 2006 as this is when I will be submitting my claim through the courts.

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Not been on the site for a while. Have isued court papers to Lloyds on the 16th February, deemed as served on the 21st February. They now have until 7th March to respond. Quick question, will they respond to the court as well as me by that date and is it as cut and dry that if they dont respond by then then I can enter judgement against them? Do they allow a little bit of leeway or not? Just wandering because of the wording on the court papers saying that if I haven't heard anything than I have a couple of tick boxes on the Notice of Issue. (request for judgement section)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm confused/panicking received counter claim from Lloyds and have decided to file allocation questionnaire with court. Went to CAB have also been advised to make sure I make one last contact with the Financial ombudsman before sending in questionnaire. what do I do? Lloyds did credit my account with £750 as a "goodwill gesture" etc I refused verbally but it went into my account anyway with the understanding that if I go to court then they would ask the judge to take this amount into consideration if I took it further. Amount claimed is more than £4k. Have until 2moro to file as deadline is 4.3.07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not been on the site for a while. Have isued court papers to Lloyds on the 16th February, deemed as served on the 21st February. They now have until 7th March to respond. Quick question, will they respond to the court as well as me by that date and is it as cut and dry that if they dont respond by then then I can enter judgement against them? Do they allow a little bit of leeway or not? Just wandering because of the wording on the court papers saying that if I haven't heard anything than I have a couple of tick boxes on the Notice of Issue. (request for judgement section)

 

Hi

They will respond to the Court, the Court will let you know. It is unlikely that they won't acknowledge, and the Court does usually give them quite a bit of leeway.

Good luck, let us know how you get on.

Barty:)

I WON!!!! :D :D :D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloydstsb-successes/1774-barty-lloyds-tsb.html

 

IF I HAVE BEEN HELPFUL PLEASE CLICK THE SCALES:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...