Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
    • whats the court claimform for? return of goods order? please complete this:  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4259 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all,first post so be gental.

 

ok parked outside my local wilkinson`s the other day to get some paint for a diy job, it was in a "loading only" bay where i normaly park when i`m popping in to pick somthing up quick, been parking there for years with not a problem.

was in the shop for about 10 min`s, when i came out found a ticket on my car for “Parked in a loading place during restricted hours without loading” .

 

the ticket states that the car was observed parked there at 12:10 and the ticket was issued at 12:15.

 

there is a sign stating loading only, but the road markings are suposed to say "loading only" according to this:

http://keycases.parkingandtrafficappeals.gov.uk/docs/LOADADJ.pdf

have been worn away.

 

thay have rejected my informal challenge, and if i appeal i have to pay the full fine if i lose.

 

Qestion is, is it worth appealing?

 

(sorry having trouble uploding pic`s, keeps saying "not a valid image file")

Link to post
Share on other sites

From your Jane Packer link:

 

SPRAKE - V - TESTER

This was a case where a motorist went into a shop, bought six champagne glasses packed into a parcel about a foot each way and returned and put it in his car. There was an exemption in the local order for the loading and unloading of goods. The High Court rejected the argument that anyone putting into his car something bought from a shop was covered by the exemption.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From your Jane Packer link:

 

SPRAKE - V - TESTER

This was a case where a motorist went into a shop, bought six champagne glasses packed into a parcel about a foot each way and returned and put it in his car. There was an exemption in the local order for the loading and unloading of goods. The High Court rejected the argument that anyone putting into his car something bought from a shop was covered by the exemption.

 

thanks michael, but what does "about a foot each way" mean exactly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

got the photos on at last!!

 

looking here:

 

http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/reclaim/parking-ticket-appeals#before

 

under this:

 

No4 There has been a procedural impropriety by the council.

 

In plain English: The council made an administrative error.

 

This applies when councils have failed to include all the required information on their tickets or 'Notice to Owner' letters, which renders the charge invalid. If you've been unfairly fined, this is a useful tactic to ensure your appeal wins.

 

According to the sexily named Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions General Regulations (2007), there's a list of information that must be contained and accurate on a civil Penalty Charge Notice. See the full list (there's a slightly different list for posted tickets).

 

In all cases, a council must respond within 56 days of receiving your formal appeal, otherwise the penalty is unenforceable.

 

 

as it states on the ticket “Parked in a loading place during restricted hours without loading” and there is no sign giving a restricting time ie 10 mins only.

 

anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

more info from above

 

According to The Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions General Regulations (2007), the following must be contained on a Penalty Charge Notice written out by a Civil Enforcement Officer:

 

The date it is served.

The name of the enforcement authority.

The registration of the vehicle.

The date and the time the alleged contravention occurred.

Why the ticket has been issued.

The amount of the penalty charge.

That the penalty charge must be paid within 28 days.

That if the penalty charge is paid within 14 days the fine will be reduced.

How to pay the charge.

If the charge is not paid within 28 days, a 'Notice to Owner' form will be sent to the vehicle owner.

That you can appeal within the first 28 days and how you need to make the appeal, including the address (and email and fax if appropriate) that appeals should be sent to.

The grounds under which you can make an appeal.

That if your formal appeal is made on time but is rejected, that you can appeal to an adjudicator.

Edited by wsdot7
hilight
Link to post
Share on other sites

as it states on the ticket “Parked in a loading place during restricted hours without loading” and there is no sign giving a restricting time ie 10 mins only.

 

anyone?

If there are no restriction times on the sign, then the hours of restriction are 24/7, therefore the the PCN states the correct contravention
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any wider pictures that show the whole bay ?

we can see another sign further down, we can not see if the loading bay is terminated before this sign.

The worn markings alone are cause for formal appeal to adjudicator once they have rubber stamped the NTO appeal with the failed stamp.

However we need to see the full bay and its markings, it has to comply to very strict standards and must be terminated from the other restrictions.

As well as WRITE not e-mail to the council to DEMAND ( not request) the traffic regulation order for the bay in question, it is not a freedom of information request, make this clear, it is a request for the TRO in effect on that street, it is a public document and must be provided upon request.

With a bit of luck they wont have one as they are expensive and time consuming to re-new.

Expert on Parking matters, Banned by MSE ! along with other parking experts on orders of the BPA !

here to SAVE you money !

Link to post
Share on other sites

As well as WRITE not e-mail to the council to DEMAND ( not request) the traffic regulation order for the bay in question, it is not a freedom of information request, make this clear, it is a request for the TRO in effect on that street, it is a public document and must be provided upon request.

.

 

AIUI the regulations only require that the TRO be available to view on request by any interested party at their offices

 

Whilst a lot of councils will send/email a copy on request, they are not obliged to do so

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...