Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you are confident that citizens advice are going to give you the help you need, then you should stick with them. No point in trying to ride two horses at the same time. It will only lead to confusion and conflicting advice. Also, the people at citizens advice get paid. Everybody on this forum works completely free of charge – no payment – no strings. I hope you get your money back, but for the moment I'm going to close this thread
    • While I agree with getting it done by an authorised dealer in this case, for future reference a stop/start battery for one of these cars are about £120 and anyone with a £40 BMW specific scanner off of Amazon can "register" the battery.
    • Dave, Section 12 seems to be a bit of a dangling limb on it's own, with no reference or explanation about the "breach" of parking out of hours. Also, rather than draw any attention to the specific 22:00 to 08:00 wording on their "draft signage", how about a slight reshuffle ...? 11. The claimant provides 2 copies of the signage on this site. One of the signs shows a time restriction of 2 hours, the other sign shows a parking restriction of 3 hours. 12. The driver stayed under 2 hours so even had the signs been visible the driver would have respected the Claimant's terms & conditions. Are the above strictly needed? The claimant has made no references to an overstay, just "out of hours". 13. The claimant also states in paragraph 8 of the witness statement: "On 17 March 2023 a vehicle with registration number was recorded as having breached the terms and conditions of parking. The driver of the aforementioned vehicle was in breach by virtue of parking on site out of hours." 14. The claimants Exhibit BA/2 also does not specify any times for "out of hours parking". Breach of a non-existent terms is not possible.   Or something along those lines? Screws up the the paragraph numberig a bit though...  
    • The Open University is hosting this event on attracting and developing young talent. Our Deputy CEO Lauren Mistry is speaking during the event.View the full article
    • Just the info in the links I added as far as I can see Just continuing Folding all the companies and trying to remove assets from UK jurisdiction while they are still perhaps under the protection of the Tory guv  it seems Don't know about others opinions, but the police 'awaiting the outcome of years of  meetings talking about it before prosecuting is getting rather thin IMO
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ending sky subscription


abc123def
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4245 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I wonder if you can help me with regard to my rights to an ammended final bill from sky. I telephoned them to give the required notice to end my sky subscription and the date was set to end my services one month later on 12th August.

 

At that time I was changing banks and did not feel it worth the effort of setting up a new direct debit for sky for that final month and decided to wait for the final bill which I would settle online in one go.

 

However sky decided as I did not have a direct debit set up that they would (without notice) withdraw my sky services on July 25th so from that date could not use the TV and all programmes recorded on sky+ were not viewable etc. no internet either.

 

I then expected a bill to arrive for the dates from the previous bill (paid in full as had all bills before that each month) up to July 25th when my services ended but have since received bills for the whole month even though they had withdrawn the services and so I had not been able to use sky.

 

I do not feel I should have to pay sky for the dates when no services were provided by them so have asked for an ammended bill from 14th July (last bill date) to 25th July when they withdrew the services. Do I have the right to demand this or have they the right to withdraw services, not provide them but still bill for them?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sky are very quick to withdraw service and i assume that the bill on 14th July was not paid? I would suggest that you therefore breached your contract. Having said that it may be worth a letter asking (not demanding) for a new bill. Explain all the circumstances and hope. They are i fear in the right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checked, I last paid 22nd June for the bill up to 14th july. Is it essential then to pay each month in advance? I just assumed for that final month I could pay at the end for what I'd used.

 

It's annoying as I reported a fault on my phone line to sky via email in December 2011 and they replied by email that they had tried to phone me about my complaint but found a fault on the line so please could I phone them to discuss it! I actually have a disability and can't use phones, it's my children that would use it. So I just left it and have paid the line rental each month and my children have made a handful of calls only this year as most of the time the line is permanently engaged due to fault. No one could call in either. So I feel I have paid sky more than they deserve already but I don't have the fight for it. I guess I will just have to pay this final bill despite not having even the TV working, after all I've been paying for a non working phone line for 9 months so what the heck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's the telecoms side of things, I would complain following the relevent gude here

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I've emailed them, I will let you know what they say in response. If they don't concede I will just pay it though actually I am not sure if I am obliged to as I have been delcared bankrupt since signing the contract so not sure I am covered by it. I think I am only liable for services used now. Really not sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sky bill you in advance and if a payment is not met the services are blocked and under their terms and conditions you are still liable for this payment whether you have their service or not. Their t&c's do now stipulate you must pay by dd and have an active dd on your account.

 

Unless you have contacted sky about your skytalk fault there is not much they can do about it now.

 

I cannot see them amending the bill.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also regarding BK, did you notify sky that you were BK? cause i find it hard to believe they would allow your services to continue if you did so and if not did you notify your trustee? as they do not normally account for sky tv in any bk which can be there determined as breach of you Bk and can overturn it.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never known anyone have their existing skyTV package turned down due to going BR if all paid up to date, the only thing I've heard about is some mobile contract providers end the contract but even then most don't. I have now switched to Virgin and passed their credit checks! I have paid all my rent/utility/service bills in full every month without fail. This Sky problem only occurred as I changed banks and didn't set up a DD for the last month thinking I would just pay it online rather than set up and then cancel for one month.

 

All my outgoings were listed on my SOA for my OR to see and they have 2 years worth of bank statements too so they are aware. IdaInFife, I'm unsure of the depth of your knowledge about BR?

 

Anyway, Sky replied to my email saying my contract says I must pay in advance and didn't so I will pay this final bill tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks drop. I have now extensively read the reams of Sky's T&C's and it says nothing about BR and they'd cover Scotland too.

 

I was just confused by a Site team member querying something incorrectly as I always assme they know what they're talking about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe not on BK but i have extensive knowledge on how sky operate :razz:

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

But if your OR is happy for you to continue to have sky then you wouldn't need to contact sky.

 

Some OR's and trustee' see this is as non essential. If a customer sends a letter of confirmation from an OR or trustee to Sky then sky do normally close the account with immediate effect.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've only heard of one person not being allowed internet on piggybankrupt, generally if you have children or need it for work they allow it. Sky's package for basic TV/internet/phone was a good deal when I took it out and the OR generally allow deals as long as they are the basic TV package and not movies/sport etc on top. However money is tight, I don't use the phone anyway so I've switched to Virgin who do unlimited internet for £22 a month, no phone line needed and I'm not using their TV. It means all my children have access to the internet for their education and we are happy to use the sky+ box as a freeview box now. The only thing I miss is being able to pause a programme while I nip to the loo! I was surprised to pass the Virgin credit check I have to say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would be surprised then that sky do have to cancel quite a lot of accounts due to BK and obviously this is only done if they are contacted to do so. I would assume as you say it is dependent on the circumstances as many cannot get basic digital tv without it.

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...