Thanks dx. Just printing the letter now but want to check something. In the bundle of paperwork they sent me, it shows my agreement start date was 01/12/2016 with a minimum 12 month term. Last payment date June 2017. I returned equipment returned July 2017. before I send this letter, just want to confirm that June 2023 is definitely statute barred, not December 2023?

Hello, I’ve reopened this because I don’t know what to do next. I’ve dragged things out as far as I can and have made a complaint to Sky about the equipment they allege not to have received back. Yet to receive acknowledgement of complaint or any other response from them. I’ve told Lowell/Overdales about this and they keep putting my account on hold for 30 days. I last made a payment to Sky on 28/06/2017. I’ve always disputed I owe this. Is it statute barred on 28/06/23? I don’t understand the limitation period where it refers to default notice etc - I don’t actually think I’ve ever had a default notice. Any help is appreciated thank you

Your advice is appreciated, thank you so much. To clarify, Lowell bought the debt from Sky. So should I raise the complaint to sky or Lowell?

But if I ignore it won’t they just start the CCJ proceedings? I feel like they’ll want the CCJ in quite soon because it’s coming up to 6 years

I appreciate your reply. I fear a CCJ for a sky bill that I don’t owe. I will do some research thanks again

Yes, Lowell’s but now it’s been passed to Overdales however I think they are the same company somewhere along the line. they sent me a letter of claim and I replied to it disputing the debt but I don’t think they’ve really taken my dispute seriously.

I have been in contact with Overdales who were passed an old Sky debt from Lowell. I last made a payment to Sky on 28/06/2017 and Overdales have threatened to take me to court. On the form they sent, I disputed the debt because I returned the Sky box and provided them with copy of a bank statement showing a transaction to the post office which was when I paid for the return of the box to the Sky equipment returns department. The box was returned because of a fault and there is evidence of a phone call that I made earlier in 2017 to try to rectify the problem. I asked Overdales to provide me with evidence to prove that I owed the amount which is £328. They have replied saying they don’t seem the post office transaction as evidence of me returning the box. There is also lots of others on Sky forums who returned Sky equipment to a company called Unipart who faced the same problem, the equipment was not logged as returned. Today they have sent me a full personal data pack containing all letters they’ve sent to me and internal screenshots of my account etc. can anyone offer any help? What are my next steps? I can upload any documents if required.

Many thanks, I really appreciate your response. Do you want me to post the back of the ticket up? If the ticket is definitely invalid, what do I say on any letter that I send to them?

Thanks for replying.

I've had a bus lane ticket. Sorry The council have sent a PCN with a photo of my car entering the bus lane. The date of posting the notice was 15-06-2010. Detection date was 25-05-2010. I know that they have to serve the notice within 28 days, which they have done. However, I was reading on this site: How to appeal parking tickets, bus lane tickets, yellow box junction and moving traffic tickets, that the PCN has to state "that if the penalty charge is paid before the end of the period of 14 days beginning with the date of service of the notice, the penalty charge will be reduced by one half;".. The ticket states that if I pay by 26 June that it will be discounted by 50%. 26 June is 11 days from 15 June? Is my ticket valid? Where have they got 26 June from?

I parked on the pavement whilst I was at work today. Everyone normally does it. Got back to my car and found a parking ticket issued by local police. The street name quoted on the ticket is atleast a 4/5 minute drive away. Do I have to pay? I admit that I could have 'caused an obstruction', but the stupid b-----d could have atleast read the steet sign.