Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Salford City Council - refuse to show council tax rules


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4243 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

For 3 years i have been having problems with Salford City Council regarding Council tax exemptions: ------ repeatedly refusing a Class A exemption on a flat: ----- refusing to visit to see that it was SO uninhabitable it had no internal walls, electrics, plumbing etc ----- refusing to answer questions ----- it took them over a year for them to change their mind - NOT UNTIL AFTER I HAD SOLD THE FLAT ON AT A LOSS DUE TO STRESS - denying any responsibility ------- repeatedly refusing a Class A exemption on a house we bought to do up and move into ----- refusing for over a year ------ refusing to visit to see how bad it was ------ refusing to answer questions ----- TAKING US TO COURT - which was a joke. The council were allowed to withdraw and resubmit - THEY NEVER DID ----- finally granting it ------ DENYING RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALL OUR STRESS ---------- repeatedly refusing Class C exemption on the above house, even though ----- they admit i lived in the house for more than 6 weeks at a time. I MOVED IN DUE TO THE STRESS IT WAS CAUSING ME AND MY WIFE ----- we took our old house off the market because of this - SO THAT WE BOTH HAD SOMEWHERE TO LIVE – so have had to pay another mortgage ----- they insist i have to prove me living at the new house made it my main residence - as my wife still lived at our old house ------ they refuse to answer questions ----- they refuse to show me proof it has to be my main residence ----- they refuse to acknowledge it is the house that should be looked at and not the individual ----- THEY HAVE NOW ISSUED A COURT SUMMONS FOR MYSELF AND MY WIFE --------- I HAVE INVOLVED: ----- COUNCIL TAX STAFF ----- DEPARTMENT MANAGERS ----- COUNCIL DIRECTORS ------ COUNCILORS ----- THE OLD COUNCIL LEADER ----- THE NEW MAYOR ----- MY LOCAL MP ----- AND STILL IT GOES ON ----------- I HAVE HAD TELEPHONE CALLS, MEETINGS, OVER A HUNDRED PAGES OF LETTERS & EMAILS ---------- WE HAVE LOST THOUSANDS OF POUNDS ---------- I HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO WORK - AND DO NOT CLAIM A PENNY OFF THE STATE ---------- ME AND MY WIFE ARE BOTH NOW ON ANTI-DEPRESSANTS ---------- ANY IDEAS ????

Edited by EcclesTony
Link to post
Share on other sites

If theres issues of maladministration then you can take it up with the the Local Government Ombudsman (but you need to exhaust the councils own complaints procedure first).

 

With regards to rules concerning Council Tax the main legislation can be found here

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1992/14/contents

but there are lots of supplementary regulations and amendments which you may need to search through.

 

Establishing a person's "sole or main residence" is key part of determining council tax as it will distinguish a property as being some one's main home or a second/holiday home and influence the chargeable amount. You may want to refer to this court case "Cox v London (South West) Valuation and Community Charge Tribunal and Poole

Borough Council Community Charge Registration Officer (1994)" as it may have some relevance to your situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your advice about the Local Government Ombudsman ------------- According to The Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) Order 1992 ---------The Council Tax (Exempt Dwellings) (Amendment) Order 1993 ------------ The Council Tax (Prescribed Classes of Dwellings) (England) Regulations 2003 ........... Classes A - K variously refer to 'sole or main residence' BUT NOT FOR CLASS C. -------------- information on the Valuation Tribunal website & guidebook also refer to 'former resident' (clarified as sole or main resident) for Classes D, E, F, I, J ..........BUT NOT FOR CLASS C...............Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am having difficulty understanding your post, it might help if you rephrase things

 

it is difficult to understand which properties, which exemptions and which periods you are referring to

 

it appears there are 3 properties - a flat, your old house and your new house

 

the issues with the flat appears to have been dealt with, is that correct?

 

i think your issue relates to an application for a class C exemption for one of the 2 houses, which property are you attempting to get the exemption for and what period?

 

during this period, was the property unoccupied and unfurnished? where were you living? where was your wife living?

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For classes D,E,F,I,J a property can remain furnished if the 'liable party' leaves the property unoccupied e.g. Class D if they are detained in prison or under the mental health act.

 

Class C: a vacant dwelling which has been such for a continuous period of less than six months ending immediately before the day in question

 

For Class C the property could theoretically remain your sole or main residence, as it need only be vacant (unoccupied and substantially unfurnished) so this shouldn't present a problem when claiming an exemption.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ist property, the flat, was EVENTUALLY sorted out. -------------- 2nd property, house we bought to do up and move into is the one we are having problems with Salford Council. --------------------- 3rd property is the one we lived in and wanted to sell ------------ Due to the stress, not a good time at home so i moved into 2nd property by myself on 2 occasions ------------ As per Class C rules, I lived in it for more than 6 weeks at a time each time -------------- tried to claim Class C ---------------- SALFORD COUNCIL AGREE I LIVED IN 2ND PROPERTY TWICE, EACH TIME WAS OVER 6 WEEKS & RULES REGARDING FURNISHED / UNFURNISHED WERE FOLLOWED AS PER CLASS C RULES ---------------- THEY REFUSED TO AWARD IT AS THEY SAID IT WAS NOT MY 'SOLE AND MAIN RESIDENCE', EVEN THOUGH CLASS C RULES DO NOT STATE IT HAS TO BE ------------------------ The rules say it is 'the property not the individual' that should be considered ----------------------- Afraid to sell 3rd property in case problems at home again mean i have to move out again (both now on anti-depressants, not good!) ------------------ costing us money we cannot afford

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, let's see if I have got my head round it...

 

You and your wife normally live at new house

You applied for and received a 6 month class C exemption in respect of old address, this was awarded?

 

Then when the exemption ran out you moved back in to old address for just over 6 weeks which would restart the clock for a class C exemption

You then moved back in with your wife and re-applied for the 6 month class C exemption, which was refused for some reason unknown?

 

You moved in to old house for a second time for just over 6 weeks

You then moved back in with your wife and re-applied for the 6 month class C exemption, which was again refused for some reason unknown?

 

You say that the Council accepts you were at old address for more than 6 weeks on each occasion, do you have anything in writing from them?

Have they given any reason for refusing both your applications?

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me and wife normally live at old house ------------- i lived at new address for over 6 weeks & applied for Class C at new address, still not awarded --------------- after 6 months i again moved into new address for over 6 weeks and then applied for a 2nd Class C, still not awarded --------------------- for each 6 month period i had applied for Class C i lived at old address with wife ----------------- got it in writing from council that they agree i lived at new address for 2 periods of over 6 weeks and complied with unfurnished etc in between --------------- they refused the Class C because they said i had to prove new address was my 'sole or main residence' each time i lived there !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not yet ------------------ Salford did the same thing twice with Class A exemptions, refusing for over a year each time with wrong reasons and then EVENTUALLY granting them -------------- i assumed they would realise they were AGAIN wrong and award the Class C

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am also waiting for information i have been asking Salford for 3 years before i apply to VT ------------ and for Salford to show me PROOF that their refusal was correct ---------------- Also, this has REALLY knocked us for 6, we are not thinking straight & can't believe Salford can get away with it EVERY TIME

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they are messing you about, you really should go over their head and appeal to VT, no point in waiting for them

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The VT is your best bet. For the "6 week rule" to apply the property dose not need to be occupied, let along be your sole or main residence, as long as its fully furnished that should be enough.

 

That's a matter for debate, the actual wording of the regs states

 

(2) For the purpose of determining the last occupation day, any period of less than 6 weeks within which the dwelling concerned was occupied shall be disregarded.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...