Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow Global / DrydensFairfax / Sainbury's Bank


pikachu73
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4231 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I'm another who has received a Northampton CCBC Claim Form on behalf of claimant Arrow Global Limited

The issue date is 5th September 2012

I did the acknowledgement of service online on 12th September 2012

Particulars of claim

1. The claim is for the sum of 1,087.27 in respect of monies owing by the defendant on a credit agreement held by the defendant with Sainsbury's Bank PLC under account number nnnnnnnn upon which the defendant failed to main payments

2. A default notice was served upon the defendant has not been complied with

3. By virtue of a sale of agreement between Sainsbury's Bank PLC and the claimant, the claim vested in the claimant who has a genuine commercial interest. The defendant has been notfied of the assignment by letter

Amount claimed = 1087.27

Court fee = 65

Solicitor's cost = 80

I've had a couple of letters from Drydens but have never heard of Arrow Global Limited

Default notice issued on 17th September 2009 however CallCredit, Experian and Equifax state a default date of 25th January 2010

Last payment of £10 was made in September 2010

I thought the debt was back with Sainbury's Bank in-house

I had PPI on the credit card and tried to claim on this when I became unemployed on all occasions

The first time, the claim was rejected as I had been sacked under probation. The subsequent times, I was contracting through an umbrella company as opposed to being a sole trader and therefore deemed self-employed

I also had late payment fees and over limit fees of £12 each over a number of months

Having read various threads on here regarding this company, I think I understand that the next step is to write a CPR letter, but am unclear who to address this to?

Also, do I need to do an SAR and if so does this go to Sainsbury's Bank or Arrow Global? I'd prefer not to write to Arrow Global as I have no evidence of them having any claim over the debt

I have 3 other debts and am now worrying that they will issue a CC claim as well, I'm also in the middle of a re-organisation at work and employment is not secure. My income was already reduced 18 month ago through another re-organisation

I max out £2000 my overdraft every month. I had some money I was going to use to pay this off, but got caught out by right to off set lasy year

I'm currently surviving on pay day loans every month and really struggling to cope. I've tried CCCS and Payplan, but I could not commit to the payment plans (long and complicated story)

I'm kicking myself for not keeping on top of things

 

Thanks

 

Nicola

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brigadier

 

Thank you very much for your reply

 

Will get the SAR sent off ASAP to the original creditor. I already have this prepared and ready to send

 

Presumably I send the CPR letter to DrydensFairfax

 

Yes, I have acknowledged service of the claim via the MCOL website on 12th September 2012 and stated that I would be defending

 

The issue date on the county court claim form is 5th September. I received the form (and nothing else) on 8th September

 

I'm going through hell at the moment with work and this and some other personal issues, so all help is very much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Picachu.

 

Ok keep your eye on the time line you have AoS on the 12/9 claim dated 5/9.You have 33 days in total ..5 deemed served so 28 days.14 to Aos and a further 14 to submit a defence (if defending).

You have sent the CPR 31.14...docs referred to :-

 

The Agreement

The Default Notice

The Assignment.

 

I would also advocate sending a section 77/78 request to Drydens tomorrow as they may not comply with the CPR.Template letter N in the library enclose a £1 PO and send recorded Del..print name.

head the request with " I do not acknowledge any debt with your company "

 

Lets see what transpires and we will take it from there when you post again.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy

 

I have not sent the CPR 31.14 as yet. Can I send the section 77/78 request together with this or are they best sent separately?

 

Never sign anything in relation to stuff like this - a tip I learnt from here many years ago, so thank you CAG for that :wink:

 

I have the original of the default notice for comparison if that is produced

 

Possibly have the signed CCA from when the card was issued in 2001, but that is a remote possibility

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send separately pikachu.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Response from drydensfairfax dated 26 September 2012:

 

"We write with reference to the above account and in particular your letter dated 19th September 2012.

 

We have requested the documents from our Client and will forward them to you upon receipt

 

We will not take any further legal action until the documents have been sent to you and you have had 14 days to respond"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent even though they state they will not take any further legal action until the docs have been sent.....bear in mind your time line and defence date.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...