Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CTS Lawyers - watchout they try to spoof you on old accidents.


ftolad
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4237 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Morning all,

 

I had a rather strange phone call yesterday afternoon on my mobile number from a company calling themselves CTS Lawyers.

 

The call was about the accident I had.

 

Obviously under normal circumstances I would immediately think that the company is on a 'fishing trip' and would tell them to go away.

 

The odd thing about this was that firstly the number was withheld.

Secondly he knew my name, but the significance here is that 4 years ago my name changed due to civil partnership.

He asked for me by my previous name.

 

Furthermore, he said that my details had been passed to them via some broker, though he wouldn't tell me who, AND that it was about a rear-shunt accident in a car we owned 5 years ago.

 

It's all rather strange.

 

According to the ICO, they have a company called DBS Law Ltd which trades under several names, one of them being ClaimsToday Solicitors, being based in Broad Street Birmingham.

 

The receptionist told me that CTS Lawyers is one of their trading names, though when someone called me back he denied this

and stated that they have an ongoing Police investigation regarding an outfit potentially using their name.

 

The DVLA confirmed yesterday that the car is no longer registered in my civil partner's name.

 

As I said earlier,

normally I would just discount this type of call,

but it was the fact that he seemed to know pertinent information about me and the vehicle,

which being slightly paranoid makes me wonder if someone is or has attempted to make a fraudulent insurance claim with my details.

 

On the back of this, I have contacted the Motor Insurance Bureau,

and a manager there told me that could search against their database to see if they hold any records of an insurance claim made in my name or against the vehicle.

 

I should add that I haven't had an accident since 1995.

 

Can anyone think of anything else that I may have missed?

 

More importantly if there is anyone out there that has had a similar call from a company calling themselves CTS Lawyers?

 

TIA.

ftolad v. Lowell - Statute Barred letter - * WON *

ftolad v. Scotcall - CCA'd, no agreement - * WON *

ftolad v. Mac Hall:

Still ongoing, official complaints procedure requested - 14 days to comply before TS, OFT and FOS.

 

All thanks to advice from CAG. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spooky, I agree. I will try to find some help for you.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could write to the CTS Lawyers at 3 Broadway, Broad Street, Birmingham, B151BQ for the attention of Head of Compliance/Data Protection officer.

 

Ask them to look into why their company is processing data and making phone calls regarding an accident involving a vehicle owned 5 years ago. If this was not your accident and you sold the car, then tell them roughly when it was sold, so they can see if they have made a mistake in contacting the wrong person.

 

Did CTS tell you that they were acting for a third party ? Or were they trying to get you to make a claim ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spooky, I agree. I will try to find some help for you.

 

Yes it is a bit spooky.

 

You could write to the CTS Lawyers at 3 Broadway, Broad Street, Birmingham, B151BQ for the attention of Head of Compliance/Data Protection officer.

 

Ask them to look into why their company is processing data and making phone calls regarding an accident involving a vehicle owned 5 years ago. If this was not your accident and you sold the car, then tell them roughly when it was sold, so they can see if they have made a mistake in contacting the wrong person.

 

Did CTS tell you that they were acting for a third party ? Or were they trying to get you to make a claim ?

 

Hi unclebulgaria67, thanks for the reply. When the guy from DBS Law Ltd/ClaimsToday called me back, he had a quick search around using my name, phone number and vehicle registration and stated that they don't hold any information at all on their database. Of course I asked him to ensure that my details are not added to any lists, etc.

 

I could send a SAR to them just in case. I've also just called the ICO back as it may be useful to trace where the phone call yesterday originated from... I am certain it was from within the UK.

 

Do you know of anyone who has had any luck from O2 in getting hold of the originating number when it has been withheld? That number could prove useful in confirming where they got my details from. The ICO advised me that that type of information would not be dealt with under the DPA, and that perhaps the Police would have better luck in tracing the call. If that's the case, should I just contact my local station, or is there a certralised fraud office or number I should call?

 

Thanks again.

ftolad v. Lowell - Statute Barred letter - * WON *

ftolad v. Scotcall - CCA'd, no agreement - * WON *

ftolad v. Mac Hall:

Still ongoing, official complaints procedure requested - 14 days to comply before TS, OFT and FOS.

 

All thanks to advice from CAG. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is a bit spooky.

Hi unclebulgaria67, thanks for the reply. When the guy from DBS Law Ltd/ClaimsToday called me back, he had a quick search around using my name, phone number and vehicle registration and stated that they don't hold any information at all on their database. Of course I asked him to ensure that my details are not added to any lists, etc.

 

I could send a SAR to them just in case. I've also just called the ICO back as it may be useful to trace where the phone call yesterday originated from... I am certain it was from within the UK.

 

Do you know of anyone who has had any luck from O2 in getting hold of the originating number when it has been withheld? That number could prove useful in confirming where they got my details from. The ICO advised me that that type of information would not be dealt with under the DPA, and that perhaps the Police would have better luck in tracing the call. If that's the case, should I just contact my local station, or is there a certralised fraud office or number I should call?

 

Thanks again.

 

None of these will be interested in finding the call. It would be a different matter if a criminal offence had actually taken place, which you could prove, as then they could justify the expense.

 

If you write to CTS compliance, they can ask their telephony/IT experts to just enter the telephone number into a query (if you give the number) and it will tell them if they have dailed the number through their lines. If they find the phone calls, they should then find the staff that dealt with the calls. Or if they cannot find the phone calls or any data relating to you, then you get something in writing from them, that the calls were not from them.

 

From what I have heard there are people in overseas call centres working on old lists. Perhaps you should ask CTS to check with overseas call centres they may use, to see if they have made the phone calls.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

None of these will be interested in finding the call. It would be a different matter if a criminal offence had actually taken place, which you could prove, as then they could justify the expense.

 

If you write to CTS compliance, they can ask their telephony/IT experts to just enter the telephone number into a query (if you give the number) and it will tell them if they have dailed the number through their lines. If they find the phone calls, they should then find the staff that dealt with the calls. Or if they cannot find the phone calls or any data relating to you, then you get something in writing from them, that the calls were not from them.

 

From what I have heard there are people in overseas call centres working on old lists. Perhaps you should ask CTS to check with overseas call centres they may use, to see if they have made the phone calls.

 

Ok, thanks for that. I think that the call originated from within the UK, so I've just spoken to Action Fraud and explained some of the details and that it seemed a little odd and the guy there agreed. He suggested that I explain everything and they would have a quick look into it to see whether someone has made an insurance claim using my details.

ftolad v. Lowell - Statute Barred letter - * WON *

ftolad v. Scotcall - CCA'd, no agreement - * WON *

ftolad v. Mac Hall:

Still ongoing, official complaints procedure requested - 14 days to comply before TS, OFT and FOS.

 

All thanks to advice from CAG. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

phishing trip.

 

the key words here are 'rear shunt'

 

if a car has a rear shunt, typically people in the car can be 'encouraged' to claim neck injury compensation.

 

thing is though

 

there is a 3yrs limit.

 

this outside that.

 

very weird.

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

phishing trip.

 

the key words here are 'rear shunt'

 

if a car has a rear shunt, typically people in the car can be 'encouraged' to claim neck injury compensation.

 

thing is though

 

there is a 3yrs limit.

 

this outside that.

 

very weird.

 

Dx

 

Re PI claims, as you know, if they were under 18 at the time of the accident, they have up to 3 years after the 18th birthday to make a claim.

 

The calls appears to be related to an accident, although the OP says they haven't had one in 15 years. Perhaps they have just found the wrong person while doing a search

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of the ambulance chasing companies buy leads from comparison sites etc, you enter that you've had a non fault accident and pound sounds light up in their eyes, this is how some of them get the date of the accident and your personal details.

 

I always use a moody telephone number when getting quotes eg 01234 567890 or the comparison sites own number

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My Husband's best friend has been down on his luck for the last 12 months so he has been living with us.

 

Just today he received a phone call on his mobile phone asking saying there is a legal complication from a rear shunt accident which occurred 3 years ago.

 

My husband's friend laughed and explained he hadn't owned a car in the last 5 years and asked them to confirm the registration.

 

The registration they gave was for my husband's car and I had reversed into a bollard 3 years ago.

 

Just as he was going to give them my number the phone cut off. He rang me in a panic and I straight away googled CTS Lawyers.

 

I personally think its all a [problem] so they can offer to sue for any injuries and make people believe they have a chance of winning some money.

 

Funny thing is the only injury sustained was to the bollard!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...