Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sold car with dodgy fsh and cam belt change ...full mot


jowitch2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4256 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

I'm afraid by having the vehicle repaired elsewhere will prejudice your claim for the cost of repairs. The seller should be given reasonable opportunity to inspect and rectify in the first instance (I note that he told you to get it diagnosed yourself but it isn't clear that he has refused to rectify). From the time scale that you describe, the warranty would be irrelevant anyway.... the seller would be fully responsible. Also, it could be argued that by having the car repaired, you have excepted it. If you were considering rejection (and from your account, I would say you did have a good case), then you should not have had any work done to it.

 

Sorry but I think you will have an up hill struggle with this now although I do suggest you contact trading Standards (you now have to go through CAB) to see if they can possibly prove me wrong.

 

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi There

 

I am aware of that ...although I will be claiming I could not get it to them as it would not start reliably and I am not driving 60 miles in a unroadworthy car..there was no offer to pick it up...that I am not too bothered about though its more the fact I want a full refund and the car going back .....as it has a false service history which is also an offence they have broke the contract other the sale of goods act.

 

The repair does not affect the fact they have mis sold me a vehicle..oh and I only found out about the service history after I got the main fault repaired.

 

Thanks anyway

 

Jo

 

But you did have the option of rejecting it and telling the seller to come and collect it. Yes, it may of meant having to take him to court but I can see that happening anyway. Are you sure that you havn't been given the wrong service book by mistake? It has been known! You need to be sure that the car has in fact been deliberately miss-sold. Some traders are experts at finding loop holes and those who do normally know their way around the system so you will need firm proof. Do you have a copy of any advertising relating to your car for example? And what about the MOT history... are there any advisory's?

 

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

May I add the issue is no longer with any repair that was needed ....that was purely the event that led me to finding out the car has a false service history ....and a potentially incorrectly issued MOT..this will the basis of my case against the dealer. I have owned it just over a week and as you have 6 months in which to dispute sale of goods then I am also well within the time scale ...as he has now refused to accept 2 recorded delivery letters from me which I have printed off the details from Royal Mail then I am sure I will have to take him to court but so be it ..it appears he is making a rod for his own back ..I also have a record of the calls made to him just in case he decides to go down the ' she never told me anything ' route .

 

Thanks for your replies though ..much appreicated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

May I add the issue is no longer with any repair that was needed ....that was purely the event that led me to finding out the car has a false service history ....and a potentially incorrectly issued MOT..this will the basis of my case against the dealer. I have owned it just over a week and as you have 6 months in which to dispute sale of goods then I am also well within the time scale ...as he has now refused to accept 2 recorded delivery letters from me which I have printed off the details from Royal Mail then I am sure I will have to take him to court but so be it ..it appears he is making a rod for his own back ..I also have a record of the calls made to him just in case he decides to go down the ' she never told me anything ' route .

 

Thanks for your replies though ..much appreicated.

 

Actually your'e not exactly correct here. The 6months you mention is the time it is "assumed" the faults were present at the time of sale and the dealer would have to prove they were not. After this the onus is on the buyer to prove they were there at the point of sale. Also you do not have a 6 month time limit.......it is infact 6 years but your rights and the way these things are worked out diminish over time.....however you would still have the right tobring an action.

 

The big issue here is that by allowing a third party to repair the car, the dealer has a get out of jail card ( though not for free). The MoT in relaity won't be held as a major issue as is only really valid at the time the test was done. VOSA might have a looksie but it will probably only be for data/evidence gathering. They cannot prove either way whether the MoT is dodgy or not as they are not present at the time of test.

 

The best bet and only one that seems solid in your post is the service history so I'd take that route myself. Mis describing is very different from the other points you mention.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually your'e not exactly correct here. The 6months you mention is the time it is "assumed" the faults were present at the time of sale and the dealer would have to prove they were not. After this the onus is on the buyer to prove they were there at the point of sale. Also you do not have a 6 month time limit.......it is infact 6 years but your rights and the way these things are worked out diminish over time.....however you would still have the right tobring an action.

 

The big issue here is that by allowing a third party to repair the car, the dealer has a get out of jail card ( though not for free). The MoT in relaity won't be held as a major issue as is only really valid at the time the test was done. VOSA might have a looksie but it will probably only be for data/evidence gathering. They cannot prove either way whether the MoT is dodgy or not as they are not present at the time of test.

 

The best bet and only one that seems solid in your post is the service history so I'd take that route myself. Mis describing is very different from the other points you mention.

 

Hi

 

Thanks once again ....all these positive vibes are just too much .....yep I know the 6 months rule is for faults etc etc I have read the whole sale of goods act 1979 and more ...as i have only had it a week I still have rights to return for full refund .....purely on mis selling ..lets forget the faults and I know about getting it repaired etc I looked into before I did so that issue is not really my point here ..I was willing to stand that as was going to keep the car until I found out about dodgy mots and service history ..........the mot should not have gone through as the boot has been split for at least the last year ....and the mot was done last week by a garage near to the dealer .....hence I am having it checked out .....anyways I have enough on my plate now without keep repeating myself here but thanks for the replies .....i think :)

Edited by jowitch2
additional info
Link to post
Share on other sites

FYI in case anyone else is in this position ever : VOSA

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Thank you for your email enquiry dated 4th September 2012, concerning an

MOT.

 

If you believe that the vehicle should not have passed its MOT, then you

can appeal against the issue of the certificate, provided that the appeal

is lodged within 28 days of the date of issue of the certificate for

mechanical defects, or 3 months for corrosion-related defects.

 

You will need to contact us on 0300 123 9000. You should have the

certificate with you when you call as we will require information from it,

and the vehicle should be in substantially the same condition as when

tested. We cannot take an appeal if items have been repaired or replaced,

even if you have the original items. (Please note that as tyres and road

wheels are easily changed, we cannot guarantee that they were on the

vehicle at the time of test, and therefore cannot take an appeal solely on

these items.)

 

We will then pass the details to your nearest VOSA Office who will then

contact you with their decision on whether the vehicle can be re-examined.

If appropriate, they will arrange a date, time and location for a VOSA

Vehicle Examiner to retest the vehicle. If in their opinion the vehicle

should not have been issued with a certificate, then appropriate action

will be taken against the garage and tester. However, VOSA cannot

authorise any compensation or remuneration as a result of any dispute

arising from this procedure, as this would be a civil matter between

yourselves and the garage.

 

If your unable to go through the appeals process because you are either

outside of the time limit or have had your vehicle repaired, we will pass

on the details you have provided to the Regional Intelligence Unit who may

use this information for further investigation.

 

I hope this information has assisted you with your enquiry, but if you have

any further questions please do not hesitate to contact us again.

 

Kind Regards

 

Rebecca

Customer Service Centre

VOSA Operations Directorate

Tel: 0300 123 9000

 

The staff at the VOSA Contact Centre are keen to hear your feedback on the

service that they provide for you,to enable them to further understand

customer requirements and make improvements where possible. Please take a

few moments to complete our Contact Centre Customer Feedback form by

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...