Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You need a back up plan. If you believe that redundancy is very likely, start looking at other employment options.  Don't leave it until you have been made redundant before looking for new employment. I regularly speak to people who have been made redundant and about mental health. Those who have a positive plan, get into employment quickly following redundancy and manage to maintain their finances. Those who don't have a plan, decide to accept redundancy and a period of unemployment. They end up in a downward spiral, with redundancy money spent, debts accumulated, mental health decline and difficulty finding new employment.  
    • Interested observer here as I'm in a similar situation. People become conditioned into seeking and maintaining a perfect credit score/file, but if your situation is that you're unlikely to obtain further credit for the foreseeable future anyway due to your other outstanding debts, then tanking your credit file now won't make a difference other than you've took back control of your finances.
    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4251 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have a court date hopefully being postponed from 25 October to 1st November...... are there any court buddies in or near Bristol? We have a solicitor on legal aid but it doesn't provide for her to attend court with us :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

How did this go?

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Without starting my own thread just yet,

can anybody confirm the following.

 

I was sure I had read somewhere that where a tenant on an Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement has vacated following the court issue of an Accelerated Possession order that any arrears or defaults could not then be made?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without starting my own thread just yet, can anybody confirm the following. I was sure I had read somewhere that where a tenant on an Assured Shorthold Tenancy Agreement has vacated following the court issue of an Accelerated Possession order that any arrears or defaults could not then be made?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?324226-Urgent-A-court-Buddy-Required-Bristol-Area-1st-Nov&p=3949595&viewfull=1#post3949595 !

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant believe that is correct, the debt for unpaid rent must remain.

the S8 repossesion is just that to get the tenant out so it can be relet.

The LL may then sue for the unpaid rent from the tenant, which is probably not worth doing otherwise they would have paid the rent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your response. We had offered to repay the 4 half-months' rent in full when they started their action as long as they used the rent to carry out the repairs. They still would not and my lawyer failed to see what it was exactly that they wanted?!

 

The N244 form which we received yesterday says a damages hearing or the assessment of rent due and for judgement to be intered for that sum. It says that a hearing is not necessary but we do want to defend it, and their behaviour and bad treatment towards us.

 

Our previous landlord's superior agent (letting agents) ceased all property maintenance beginning from January last year after we had been there 8 years as exemplary tenants. Leaking, rusted radiators that were disconnected and not repaired/replaced, leaking shower cubicle, and exterior drainpipes broken and fallen off.

 

As I now know, I wrongly held back half the rent for 4 months to try to enforce them to carry out repairs. A new office manager arrived on the scene and issued us with a Section 21 notice in July. They dropped this case a day before the due court date. They then issued another action under Section 8.

 

In both instances, we filed a very construction defense and that was then an order for Accelerated Possession arrived in November. By now, we were so disgusted with their behaviour that the courts granted us the maximum 6 weeks with a leaving date of 3rd January 2012.

 

Their claim is completely incorrect and we have never had the opportunity to defend ourselves.

 

My husband is of poor health and is in receipt of Pension Credits and we have a 12-year old son who is in receipt of DLA.

 

With the previous actions related to Housing, we were able to secure a solicitor with legal aid but apparently this is now a 'debt' matter and we do not qualify.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/ManagingDebt/Makingacourtclaimformoney/DG_195812

 

As I now know, I wrongly held back half the rent for 4 months to try to enforce them to carry out repairs.

 

I would ring these up http://www.nationaldebtline.co.uk/ Freephone number from payphone/landlines or Vist your local CAB office http://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/index/getadvice.htm

 

or

 

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/england/debt_e/debt_help_with_debt_e.htm

 

See if they can help you ? or find someone represent you in the county court,Good luck....

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you vacated the property? and if so when? not sure from what you say.

if not then suggest you contact Shelter, they may be able to help as eviction may the result.

there are various courses of action you could of taken, witholding rent is NOT one of them though.

A LL not carrying out essential repairs can and is often taken as affecting your quiet enjoyment of your tenancy, under the Landlord and tenant act. and you could of taken proceedings on that basis, as continued prevarication not to do these can be considered harrasement under the prevention of eviction act, which is a criminal offence.

Not paying rent leaves you open to the action of a section 8 and repossession as you have found out. Suggest you pay outstanding rent asap.

then take action on the above, however Shelter will advise.

was any deposit involved?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your responses. I only withheld half a month's rent at a time in sheer desperation to try and force them to do repairs. In theory, we were only able to use half the house! I was having to turn the cooker on full blast with the door open to provide heat to the kitchen/diner. The gas fire in the lounge had been in a state of disrepair for many months and I had personally and dangerously wired a battery in to make it work.

 

From 2006 to 2009, there were poor repairs made to the leaking shower cubicle upstairs which had leaked badly through the lounge ceiling below and rendered redecorating impossible. Eventually, the apologise and after I had personally repaired it, they let us off a month's rent in lieu.

 

One director had appeared unannounced at the house without an appointment demand £1000's unpaid rent, quite incorrectly! I was 2 weeks behind....... He offered to let us use the £1250 deposit to cover it!

 

The deposit, agents fees, and 1st month's rent was paid by the Royal British Legion in 2003 when we originally occupied the property. We have never seen a TDS Certificate from them and the RBL's letter clearly stated that they expected it to be returned to them on vacating the property and if not, an explanation as to why not.

 

At this stage, I need to know 2 things:

 

1) How to react to this N244a received yesterday from their solicitors, and

2) How and when to counter-claim and sue them for their mis-management and harrassment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can understand why you withheld rent !

 

But you withheld rent and after 8 weeks of arrears it is mandatory eviction and Judge has No choice but to grant possession order on AST...

 

There is at least one Free phone number I posted here http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?362244-Accelerated-Possession&p=3950304&viewfull=1#post3950304 you can phone on Monday or Visit your local CAB office on Monday,they are best placed to advise you on this....

 

Good luck

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When did this happen?

 

Have you had to move out yet?

 

Had your tenancy ended?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, I now know that and have learned the hard way.

 

The courts gave us the maximum 6 weeks which took us to 3rd January 2012, so our Xmas was ruined and I had already got Shelter place us on the homeless register.

 

Why the agents chose to treat us like that I do not know!!!!

 

After over 8 years tenancy,

they had told us we were their longest remaining tenants and were exemplary.

They even gave us the top score on the 'search' for the new estate agents when I found us a new home at the last minute, ie, 28th December!!!

 

My local CAB is hopeless, impossible to get in without an appointment and never return calls on their answer phones. I am fully prepared to represent myself in court. I just need some assistance with procedures as outlined below...

Edited by AA99
Link to post
Share on other sites

As you had been their 8 years was this on the same contract? the deposit protection only came in on April 2007.

In any event as tenancy ended prior to April 2012 you cant sue for non-protection, but you can to get your deposit back, did you get the deposit back or did the LL keep it to cover rent owed, if so why are they sueing you.

As said you can counter claim for all the hassle and non-repairs which effected your 'quiet enjoyment'

Speak to the court about counterclaim.

But suggest you write to their solicitor first detailing that you are going to do this and on what grounds and list everything that was wrong for how long etc.

Loss of amnenity, use etc.

Did it have a gas safe certificate that had to be renewed every year ( legal requirement )?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The lease was originally renewed every 6 months at an admin cost of £30 but after the first 5 years, we were issued with a 12-month lease.

 

I have no idea what happened to the deposit.

 

The gas certificate had not been done for the last year that we were there and I have a recorded telephone call to their office proving this (thank you Truecall), however, they quickly sent their gas man around before we vacated and he signed it off saying the fireplace was OK. I have taken photographs to prove it was not!!

 

I am very concerned about the time factor as they say a case without a hearing has been fixed for 4th September. How do I seek advice, prepare a defence and submit all this prior to that date?

 

Do you think a letter to their solicitor saying that we are more than prepared to counter claim will make them back off? I do think they have used bullying tactics from day one......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you asked them for it back? if not do so and see what they say.

In each of the contracts they must acknowledge that you paid a deposit, that is your confirmation that it was paid.

Yes tell them you are going to counter claim, and you want the deposit back.

include that therew as no gas cert, everything you can think of.

Put all this as your defence.

Also the letter you send to them.

You can take all this to court and submit on the day if you have to.

The court will assist, please speak to them.

Also judge will be fair and wont lat them bully you, this is not a criminal trial.

But eveidence is king have you photos of things that were wrong, letters asking for repairs etc. that were not done, copies of the contract with the deposit shown.

These will all help your case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, I never asked for the deposit back because I've never had a certificate of TDS. They just added a paragraph in one of the leases saying it was held with one of them. Also, I have the original letter from the Royal British Legion saying they expected it back!

 

I have all the evidence, phone calls, letters, photographs, witnesses. I filed all this in our defence when they issued the other court cases but they dropped them both the day before they were due to be heard!

 

They had sent us a 'bill' in May this year which we ignored. It included costs for carpet cleaning (after a family of 4 plus dog after 8 years?!) and most damage had been done by leaking rusting radiators! The bill did not include the deposit being deducted.

 

I am a bit confused as to whether I should in the first instance write to their solicitors stating that I intend to defend and counterclaim or if I should write to the court and say this or if I do all this on the day of the hearing.

 

The N244a I have received from the solicitors says a hearing is not requested?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep, agree, you should reuest a hearing on the grounds you wish to contest, speak to the court they will tell you what to do.

then write to LL and request deposit back etc. and other points you will be seeking compensation for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you kind people :)

 

The covering letter is entitled Notice Of Hearing Of Application and then the actual N244 says:

 

Q3. What order are you asking the court to make and why?

The listing of a damages hearing for the assessment of rent due and for judgment to be entered in that sum.

 

Q.4 Have you attached a draft of the order you are applying for?

No

 

Q.5 How do you want to have this application dealt with?

Without a hearing

 

Q.10 What information will you be relying on, in support of your application?

The claimant issued proceedings for a possession order and rent arrears following the service of a Section 8 notice. In the event there were delays in the matter being listed for a hearing. In those circumstances the claimant chose to pursue a separate possession order through the accelerated route followinng service of a section 21 notice. A possession order was duly granted on 22 November 2011.

 

It is the claimant's case that the defendants owe rent arrears in the sum of £xxxxxxxx plus legal fees of £535.

 

The purpose of this application is to ask the court to list these proceedings for a 30 minute hearing at the first open date for the rent arrears to be assessed and for a judgment to be given for the sum found to be due..

 

 

 

Apologies, but the legal wording is baffling me a bit. Also, should I also be hearing directly from the court too??

 

I shall phone the courts shortly and start getting my letter together.

Edited by AA99
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...