Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • all DYL's are subject to a TRO. looking at this newish, ever increasing as old ind units have gotten removed, estate, there are only lines on one side, on the other there is a parking lane with traffic calming through which you mention. i seriously doubt your mate has any clue what he is talking about.!! its not a private housing assoc estate. so its a public council owned road. no construction co can just decide to draw their graffiti on a road. the DYLs are certainly there pre 2016 even before his home was built. now ive had a quick look to see if the main access to royal park road has signs. there is no royle park road even on your map but there is a royal barn road which leads to where you are parked royal road has a restriction sign on the pole by the fence of the electric substation jnc with gipsy lane there does not appear to be one leading in from the other end - tesco petrol station
    • Hi All. I was driving in Stevenage down a 40 road.  After coming off the motor way i noticed my car felt a little "weird" so i accelerated, then slowed the car down.  Shortly after i got stopped by a manned police car with a laser. During the stop the officer stated i was doing 54 in a 40, the conversation was short, but he said i would unlikely get a awareness course and it was most likely 3 points and a fine.  Mrs thought it was a good idea to have dairy when she is lactose intollerant on date night, so we just got on our way.  At the time, i didnt admit to the offence, but did say i didnt realise and had slowed down in any case. The officers chest camera was recording and on. At the stop, he asked where to send the fine to, as i knew i would be travelling to visit family up north, i provided my temporary details at that location in Yorkshire. It is now 05/05 and i havent recieved anything at either my home address in Stevenage or the temporary address. 1. Is there a time limit in which paperwork needs to be sent to me. 2. SHould i query the ticket as i dont want to miss any deadlines (if so who do i check with?) OR should i keep queit. 3. Given nothing has arrived in 20 days, is there a chance of appeal if and when it comes through? Many thanks CrazeUK
    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt recieved any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her ,ail until last week. She recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Written confirmation Old Job filled before handing in notice!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4279 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Eveniing

 

As the title states I have a ex-colleague who was considering taking up a new post - they had meetings with HR where they informed HR that another post had been offered and was considering it. They kept HR informed only to be told before agreeing to take up the 2nd offered post that the current job of my colleague was going to be flled by someone else a couple of weeks time before they themself could work off their notice.

 

I take it this is constructive dissimisal? If so what particular part of the employment law covers it [i believe Breech of Contract, but I could be wrong]?

 

The unusual behaviour of HR at my old work place continues to amaze.

 

Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

so we are clear

 

- colleague goes for a new job - with current employer or a new one?

- colleague is offered job

- colleague tells HR they have been offered a new job and are thinking of taking it

- colleague does not hand in notice

- HR tell colleague they have someone ready to take colleague's job

 

...and then what?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Emmzzi

 

- colleague goes for a new job - with current employer or a new one? [New Employer]

- colleague is offered job [Correct]

- colleague tells HR they have been offered a new job and are thinking of taking it [Correct]

- colleague does not hand in notice [Correct]

- HR tell colleague they have someone ready to take colleague's job [Correct]

 

...and then what?

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be clear Colleague has started the new job.

 

But is extremly upset at treatment and wishes to take ET route for closures sake.

 

CEO dissimissed registered complaint, no investgation beyond letter to say there was no case to answer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So something happened between the last point and starting new job. How was the last day of work agreed? When did colleague hand in their notice? etc. We do need the whole story in order to advise!

 

For example, if colleague just didn't show up to work.... no case to answer.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Confusing post - but I think the gist of it may be....

 

  • Employee 1 is keen to take up a new role within the company.
  • Ergo, the company is able to slot in Employee 2, (who is in the process of working out his/her notice) into Employee 1's old role, hence (thankfully) Employee 2 still has a job.
  • Employee 1 is miffed because the employer did this before Employee 1 moved into new role.

Q: Does Employee 1 grounds for constructive dismissal?

 

Have I got the plot-line right?

 

And now Employee 1 wants to go to an ET for 'closure'?

Edited by SweetLorraine
Link to post
Share on other sites

My apologies all - never know who is lurking

 

The head of HR had a habit of acessing people PCs remotely without telling them and this forum was accessed on a few occassions.

 

SweetLorraine:

 

- Employee 1 is keen to take up a new role with (New) company.

- Ergo, the company is able to slot in Employee 2, (a Temp) into Employee 1's old role.

- Employee 1 is miffed because the employer did this before Employee 1 moved into new role. (Did not confirm was leaving at any time until accepted 2nd Job offer, this confirmation of leaving occured after receiving notification job was being filled by Temp)

Q: Does Employee 1 grounds for constructive dismissal? (Correct)

 

Have I got the plot-line right?

 

See added stuff in brackets above.

 

And now Employee 1 wants to go to an ET for 'closure'? Due to Treatment by HR/CEO.

Edited by Gazza01
Clarity [I hope!]
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you only have an ET on your hands if employee 1 turned up for work and was told to leave because employee 2 was now doing their old job. You have not been clear if that was what happened, or if something else happened.

 

"Closure" IMHO is not enough reason for an ET - see othe rposts for the stress caused by waiting, bundle prep, etc etc.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another way of looking at it is :

 

- Employee 1 informs HR that they has been offered 2 jobs elesehere, original job withdrawn, so is considering 2nd job

- Hr sends notification to Employee 1 that post will be filled at certain date

- date is before Employee can confirm 2nd Job is suitable or can work off notice

- at no point did Employee 1 confirm date of leaving, only that was considering 2nd Job

Link to post
Share on other sites

But at some point employee 1 didn't turn up for work because they were in a new job, yes?

 

I can't see what they are claiming for other than hurt feelings. There's no financail loss is there?

 

I'm sorry, on what you are describing you really don't have a case. But you also seem to not be addressing my points.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, well, without that, cannot advise any further. Me, I donlt think it's worth the pain for score settling and moving on with your life is better than becoming bitter....

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gazza01,

 

the Tribunal Service use a fairly tight, prescriptive list to decide what claims to consider. It's called the 'jurisdiction list'.

 

http://www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/employment/claims/jurisdiction

 

It might be worth having a look at it and a think about it.

 

It might also be worth having a frank discussion with a solicitor to decide on what might be best to do. I wish I had done that at the beginning of my descent into (a kind of) 'hell'.

 

Maybe your friend should shake the dust from his/her sandals, put it behind them and move on. I can tell you now, I had no idea how emotionally draining and expensive it would be just to stand up for yourself in an ET process. I can imagine your friend's ex-employer might have plenty of wriggle room to play with.

 

Best advice perhaps? Why don't you both go out and get sloshed and raise your glasses to the fact that you don't work there anymore?

 

All the best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Constructive Dismissal would be a non-starter - the employee does not appear to have been forced out of his job due to a breach of contract by the employer - indeed he had already secured alternative employment (although had not confirmed that he was leaving formally). The employee has also not suffered any detriment or financial loss through the employer's actions other than being (probably rightly) upset that the job was filled before he confirmed that he was leaving.

 

Certainly a breach of procedure, but no cause of legal action from what I have seen here - unless there is a lot more to the story.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...