Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • have you proved at what house was it left outside of & stolen from ...yours or the neighbours? the fact it was for a warranty return means nothing. neither does it that the repairer/retailer have special instructions with DPD for them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer ..you might have overruled them with your instructions on the DPD website, you stated, neighbour/safe space?? if it was left outside your door, which you appear to indicate RE: i can't see you winning this...you created your own problem with what you put on the DPD website?    
    • oh well i wonder what new fake documents they have made up then...for them to try this.... just to check nothing funky like Link have filed an n244 to lift the stay and strike out her defence....she hasnt moved since last court comms has she?   is this an n24? bit unusual for a 13mts stay to just be lifted... has she not received anything from link/kearns in the last fw weeks like a docs bundle? bit like this thread... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466576-lc-assetlinkkearns-claim-form-2-mbna-cc/?do=findComment&comment=5256397  
    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Santander berevment torture


andyinlondon
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4219 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

This is the story of how Santander treats not only their own customers but also the bereaved relatives of one of their customers.

 

My mother passed away back in January 2009 and I was named the sole beneficiary in her will and the executor of her estate.

All in all an upsetting time, with lots of paperwork to do, people and organizations to inform, arrangements and claims to make ect, ect.

All the organizations I had to contact were very helpful and sympathetic and tried to make things as easy as possible to resolve, insurance companies the pensions office and the local branch of the Santander where my mother did her banking.

 

 

However the nice chap at the local branch of Santander was not able to do anything with regard to my mother’s accounts or even the Santander shares that she held from the Santander take over of the abbey.

 

 

He asked for her documents and copied them all, death cert, marriage cert will and my id,

 

 

He photocopied them all and said that he would have to send them to the probate department to be processed.

 

 

He said it would take 7 to 10 days but it was a strait forward case and would be quickly dealt with.

 

 

It went downhill from there!

 

 

I left it for two weeks trusting that what I had been told was correct but having not heard anything I thought I would check on the progress.

I called the local branch and spoke to the account rep who said he had sent the paper work in and was surprised I had not had any reply.

He then spoke to the probate dept who asked him to resubmit the paperwork and that they would then deal with it.

Another week goes by and the same thing happens again ... paperwork resubmitted yet again and calls made to the probate dept by the account rep.

 

 

This time the probate dept are getting snotty with the account rep but he resubmits the paperwork as they request.

 

 

Another week and still nothing so I chase it up and the account rep tries to call the probate dept who hang up on him, so he calls the manager of the probate dept and complains about what has happened.

The manager promises to look into it and call him back. Of course this does not happen.

 

 

So further calls are made and the bank manager gets involved and eventually some of my mother’s accounts are closed. The probate dept then sends out a series of cheques from these accounts most of which were for a few pounds each.

 

 

At last I think a light at the end of the tunnel it has taken some 7 weeks but finally a resolution.

 

 

But of course it is not at all finished.

 

 

Another couple ofweeks go by and nothing further from Santander so I call the account rep again who tries to chase it up but gets nowhere.

At this point he tells me that the shares have to be resolved separately and to contact Santander directly to get the claim form.

 

 

So 3 calls to the Santander shareholders helpline over three weeks produces no claim form

 

 

So I had to call to Santander complaints line to even get a claim form sent out and I am sure this will be another epic battle. (still not resolved some 3 years later)

Back to the rest of the accounts and another week goes by so I call the complaints dept to complain and I am told they cannot do anything as the branch are dealing with it.

 

 

So I call the branch who tell me, no the complaints dept are now dealing withit. So I give it a few days and call complaints again who insist that no the branch is dealing with it and they cannot touch it until the branch writes tome and tells me they have failed to resolve it.

 

 

So I call the branch again and they tell me they are sending me this letter. At which point I lose it,

 

 

I call the chairman’s office and lodge an official complaint with them, this is supposed to be the top level complaint in the whole organization.

 

 

I speak to a polite lady who expresses concern and says that they will take over the complaint at head office and resolve it quickly.

 

 

So I leave it another week and hear nothing so I call them again and am told that they have sent out an acknowledgment letter and someone will be assigned to investigate my complaint.

 

 

So in other words they have done nothing for yet another week!

I have had to deal with the death of my mother and all the pain and trauma that that has caused but I am not even been allowed to try and begin the healing process because Santander are forcing me to confront her death on a daily basis and rubbing my face in it buy making me fight and chase them every day now.

 

 

Santander were unlawfully holding my mother’s money with no excuse, they cannot explain why.They claim there is no problem but refuse to process the paperwork

 

And to cap it all........ The best bit now!

 

I got a letter from their debt recovery department demanding that I, as the executor of her estate clear a small overdraft that was left on her current account.

 

 

This despite the fact that Santander are holding over ten times that amount still in her other accounts.

 

 

And of course the probate department are supposed to clear any debts or overdrafts ECT as part of the process of closing the accounts before they release any funds to the estate.

 

When I first went into the branch to formally inform them of my mothers death and give them all the paper work they had requested, they had print outs of all my mother's accounts with balances and totals.

 

I was given this information but alas not the actual documents

so that I could do the required probate steps and make all the arrangements.The final figure paid from Santander was £5000 less than this amount. With no explanation as to why.

 

And the complaint to the chairman’s office

 

well after a few weeks of, you guessed it no contact or information I got a garbled phone call saying that they had investigated and yes it had not gone a sit should and lessons had been learned, no disciplinary action at the probate dept, denial of the missing £5000 and an offer of £500 compensation.

 

My reply to that was unprintable.

 

At that point I pretty much gave up as I could not take the stress and upset any more

 

 

 

Now jump forward to 2012 and the saga continues.

 

I am now getting threatening letters from the German government and the solicitors they have hired in London because once again Santander lied to me and have stolen money again from my late mother.

 

When I reported her death to Santander and went through the whole horrible process I described above, I was told that all of my mother’s accounts were closed and all activity was suspended on them,

not so!

 

I find out from the German government who have been paying a pension to my late mother and this pension has been happily taken by Santander and kept by them.

 

No mention to me about it and into a supposedly closed account.

 

Naturally the German government want this over paid money back and Santander are refusing to return it either to the pension provider or to me so I could return it.

 

So let this saga be a warning to you all………. If you think you may die one day and if you have relatives who will have to deal with things after you are gone........ Then make sure you do not bank with Santander

 

Andy

 

 

 

Edited by citizenB
formatting

HSBC

Prelim sent 1st aug

LBA sent 15th aug

MCOL issued 31st aug

offer recieved and rejected 5 sept

second offer recieved 3rd oct

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, a dreadful story and one that we see time and time again in respect of Santander.

 

I think perhaps you should start the complaint process again. In letter form - you need to provide the entire saga in bullet point fashion and send to the Head Honcho at Santander.

 

You should make this a Formal Complaint - they have 8 weeks to resolve or provide you with a Final response letter. This will allow you to take your complaint to the the Financial Ombudsman.

 

I am sure there will be others reading your story, who will also offer advice that will be useful.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the replies guys i will give the two above a try but i dont hold out much hope it will resolve anything.

 

i am almost inclined to let the germans take me to court for the pension money and use that to publicise it but i would probably get stuck with the costs and lose as well

HSBC

Prelim sent 1st aug

LBA sent 15th aug

MCOL issued 31st aug

offer recieved and rejected 5 sept

second offer recieved 3rd oct

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

A bit of an update on my case,

 

like an idiot I thought I would give them one last chance to resolve the issuesI have with them and contacted them on the 15th of august, I suggested they have a look at the above thread and told them I was giving them one last chance to resolve it.

 

I got a lot of ooh we agree it is terrible and we have let you downs along with we will treat this with the utmost urgency and we promise to resolve it quickly ect ect, we will put our best investigator on it strait away.

so a week goes by and .......... yup you guessed it nothing had been done, not even assigned to an investigator to look at.

when I called them again I was told it would be a different investigator and not the (best) one I had been promised, then I got a call from them the next day and it was the (best) one after all that was going to investigate and yes it would be prompt!.

Another week goes by and I get a call saying that she is still investigating and to be patient.

 

two more weeks go by and I hear nothing so I call them again today and get more fobbing off with no progress and am told the investigator is going on holiday on Wednesday (in two days time)

 

but not to worry as they really are taking my complaint seriously honest!

 

so I let rip a little and got the usual empty promises apologies and excuses

 

I was told "I don’t have full access to the records and have to ask for them from the various departments involved but some of them have not replied to repeated requests"

I asked, if as a supposed senior investigator in their "special investigations" department does she not have any authority to insist on or force cooperation when conducting an investigation?

I was told not really.

I asked her if she thought that refusing to cooperate with an investigation regarding missing money in a bank was an acceptable response to an investigator of said missing money, she would not answer that.

And I asked her if she thought that the refusal to cooperate was perhaps a sign of guilt once again I got no answer.

 

So all in all, about what I expected from Santander but yes I was stupid enough to cling to a glimmer of hope that they might eventually do something right.

 

I was promised an update by Wednesday before she goes on holiday, so once again it is wait and see.

 

 

I got a second phone call this afternoon from them, even more confusing now.

 

Apparently my mother had an Isa that was renewed for another year in April of 2009 but they are not sure if it was included in the probate dept settlement ofaccounts.

( from that you can pretty much guarantee it was not but will they admit it )

 

the even more confusing thing is that my mother died in January three months before and could not have authorised the Isa renewal which apparently is needed for it to be renewed according to santander.

It should have been suspended and closed in January and not even been still running let alone renewed in April.

 

And the best bit is they don’t know if it is still running now or closed or where the money from it is or where it went to!!!

 

 

 

that latest bit of info was more than a little concerning though, an investment account still showing as open with money in it but the investment department claiming it is closed but they have not bothered to update their records

(in three years!)

some thing definatly fishy there

 

but now the investigator has gone on holiday and I am not allowed to know when or if she will be back and maybe someone else will continue the investigation (rugsweep) or maybe not

 

Andy

 

HSBC

Prelim sent 1st aug

LBA sent 15th aug

MCOL issued 31st aug

offer recieved and rejected 5 sept

second offer recieved 3rd oct

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you made a complaint to both FOS & the ICO?

 

Not much point going to the FOS

 

have a look at the rip off britain report here http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01myg76

HSBC

Prelim sent 1st aug

LBA sent 15th aug

MCOL issued 31st aug

offer recieved and rejected 5 sept

second offer recieved 3rd oct

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Well as you probably guessed it was a waste of time trying to get the grave robbers (santander) to look at my complaint and see reason.

i got a very off hand phone call from a ryan in their complaints department who admitted that they had taken 9 months of pension payments after my mother had died but said "that is the pension providers fault not ours and you cannot have the money back"

 

he also said there is no trace of the missing £5000 so it must have been a branch error !!!

 

He then went on to offer £200 in compensation for all of the above

 

my thoughts on them are unprintable

 

so next steps

 

i think a SAR to get all the records of my mothers and my dealings with them, but how do i word a SAR for my mothers information,

 

as the executor of her estate do i have the rights to request this or should i do it in her name and see if they notice?

 

thanks

 

Andy

HSBC

Prelim sent 1st aug

LBA sent 15th aug

MCOL issued 31st aug

offer recieved and rejected 5 sept

second offer recieved 3rd oct

Link to post
Share on other sites

Typical Santander drivel, it doesn't matter whether it was a branch error or not it is still their corporate liability.

 

You really need to get the FOS involved, it doesn't matter whether you agree with their decision you don't have to abide by it but Santander would. The point is to exhaust all the complaints procedures & possibly sue Santander. Even though this could drag on for a year interest is still accruing at the Statutory 8%.

 

i think a SAR to get all the records of my mothers and my dealings with them, but how do i word a SAR for my mothers information,
I don't think you can obtain this information, but you could check with the ICO to see.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rights under the Data Protection Act apply only to living persons. However there may be concerns that the family have about services to their relative. Please remember that there are still issues of confidentiality surrounding access to information about a person who has died. The person may have consented or clearly refused consent to disclosure of the information while they were alive. The executor of the deceased person's estate or their next of kin will inherit their right to confidentiality. However access to their information may be given at the discretion of the Creditor.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...