Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Eviction for Benefit Fraud. Please Help.


inn0cence
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2855 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OP said the appeals have been 'done'.

 

yes, she might have filed the appeal and started the process, but from what I understand they haven't been heard yet. A case needs to be built by someone who actually understands the system - a lot of criminal solicitors don't - and its already been stated that this solicitor only does criminal court, not civil - benefit Tribunals are civil court.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 217
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

OP said the appeals have been 'done'.

the appeal has been sent in. thats what i meant.

 

Again, you seem to be posting different information - in post 166 you state the solicitor 'has done the appeals', that's past tense. In this post you say 'will deal'.

 

Which is it?

solicitor has sent the appeal in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes, she might have filed the appeal and started the process, but from what I understand they haven't been heard yet. A case needs to be built by someone who actually understands the system - a lot of criminal solicitors don't - and its already been stated that this solicitor only does criminal court, not civil - benefit Tribunals are civil court.

 

this is going to be a problem because the solicitor has already sent in the appeal pack.

 

hey, what happens if at the appeal, the appeal gets turned down?

 

is there a further appeal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there is some cross-purpose here.

 

What is the appeal for? For the benefits decision to be overturned re granting of benefits?

 

OP, the post you tell me to read makes no sense in relation to what I asked. I shall have a quick re-read of the thread just to see whether you mentioned it previously or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there is some cross-purpose here.

 

What is the appeal for? For the benefits decision to be overturned re granting of benefits?

 

OP, the post you tell me to read makes no sense in relation to what I asked. I shall have a quick re-read of the thread just to see whether you mentioned it previously or not.

 

My understanding is an appeal has been put in regarding the original living together decision. A revision has been requested regarding the new claim which was refused on grounds they were still living together.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is going to be a problem because the solicitor has already sent in the appeal pack.

 

hey, what happens if at the appeal, the appeal gets turned down?

 

is there a further appeal?

 

What do you mean by 'sent in the appeal pack'?

 

If the appeal fails then the only reason it can be appealled further is on an error of law - this happens rarely. So if the appeal fails then the overpayment stands and there is nothing to stop criminal prosecution - why its very important to get the right representation.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is an appeal has been put in regarding the original living together decision. A revision has been requested regarding the new claim which was refused on grounds they were still living together.

 

Cheers, I had got the impression from the posts that the appeals had been done and prosecution was pending. I still think the whole story hasn't been told however.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers. I still think the whole story hasn't been told however.

 

My experience with these things is that stories in these situations always have to be taken with a pinch of salt.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know any about CT.

 

As the OP friend has had a demand for back dated Council tax "CT"

 

Is this now just now a outstanding Debt and Council can pursue this now at the County court (Civil)

 

Or

 

Can the Council pursue this now at the Magistrate court (Criminal) for non payment.

 

? ?

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post 132, point 3, referred to the Council Tax issue. If the bailiffs have already been sent in, then there is already a liability order.

 

I will repeat, however, that I don't think the full story is available to us, and therefore any snippets of advice given may be wrong as they respond in isolation to bits that may change if the full story was given.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post 132, point 3, referred to the Council Tax issue. If the bailiffs have already been sent in, then there is already a liability order.

 

I will repeat, however, that I don't think the full story is available to us, and therefore any snippets of advice given may be wrong as they respond in isolation to bits that may change if the full story was given.

 

Thanks,I missed that post you point out,So liability order issued by Magistrate court !

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post 132, point 3, referred to the Council Tax issue. If the bailiffs have already been sent in, then there is already a liability order.

I will repeat, however, that I don't think the full story is available to us, and therefore any snippets of advice given may be wrong as they respond in isolation to bits that may change if the full story was given.

 

i dont know of any liability order. what i do know is that she went to court for the CT. a man from LA spoke to her in lobby. and he said (something in lines of) he does not know what is going on with this. and that she should go home and he would write to her.

 

What do you mean by 'sent in the appeal pack'?

 

If the appeal fails then the only reason it can be appealled further is on an error of law - this happens rarely. So if the appeal fails then the overpayment stands and there is nothing to stop criminal prosecution - why its very important to get the right representation.

 

where do i get hold of a welfare rights person?

 

as far as i know she has a letter from the courts to say they have the appeal and will let her know of the outcome when it happens.

 

can she get the papers back, and can she put extra evidence in there before the appeal gets heard?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

where do i get hold of a welfare rights person?

 

as far as i know she has a letter from the courts to say they have the appeal and will let her know of the outcome when it happens.

 

can she get the papers back, and can she put extra evidence in there before the appeal gets heard?

 

Ok, this is the process: An appeal is made in writing to the council or on form GL24 to the DWP (if there is a DWP decision to appeal). The appeals section for housing benefit (and DWPif relevant) will look at their decision again and if they can't change it will send an 'appeal pack' to the Tribunals Service - this is everything to do with the decision from original claim forms, renewal forms, printouts of contacts with the HB section, maybe a transcript of the IUC, details of any evidence they have collected - and their arguments as to why they thing your friend was living with her ex. Around this time the person appealling will be sent a copy of the appeal pack and on the top is a form to send to the Tribunal Service stating if the person wants an oral or paper hearing, needs an intepreter, can accept a cancellation on short notice. This is thn sent back and if the person opts for a paper hearing (very very bad idea) they just wait for the decision. If its a face to face hearing, then they are sent a date and time to attend for the appeal to be heard.

 

this should all have been explained by the solicitor. If a paper hearing has been requested, she needs to immediately request it changed to an oral hearing - a paper hearing in this case would be very unlikely to be successful. yes more evidence can be sent, but also important in a case like this is that someone experienced pulls together a 'submission' for the Tribunal, which is basically a written statement explaining your friend's side of the case, presenting her evidence in context, and arguing against or explaining any evidence presented by the other side (which will be in the appeal pack).

 

what area of the country is your friend in? we may be able to suggest some organisations in the area that could help.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Estellyn you are a great help.

Her solicitor is currently on holiday and will be back in the office on Monday. I will go and talk with him directly. And find out exactly what is going on. And then I shall write On here.

Someone said that we cant really answer questions unless we know the story.

Well I'm working on finding out.

Just bear with me please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Estellyn you are a great help.

Her solicitor is currently on holiday and will be back in the office on Monday. I will go and talk with him directly. And find out exactly what is going on. And then I shall write On here.

Someone said that we cant really answer questions unless we know the story.

Well I'm working on finding out.

Just bear with me please.

 

No problem, we'll be here when you get more info.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

 

 

How much do the rent arrears stand at now,last time you posted it was £2000 + http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?361109-Eviction-for-Benefit-Fraud.-Please-Help.&p=3962245&viewfull=1#post3962245

 

And has any of the arrears been paid off yet ?

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How much do the rent arrears stand at now,last time you posted it was £2000 + http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?361109-Eviction-for-Benefit-Fraud.-Please-Help.&p=3962245&viewfull=1#post3962245

 

And has any of the arrears been paid off yet ?

 

She is paying off £5 a week.

But it won't mean anything if HB doesn't come in.

Rent probably stands at about £2200.

 

Edit.

Edited by inn0cence
Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there an eviction date? Or do you know the court date where this will be ordered?

 

Suspend Possession order granted to Housing Association http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?361109-Eviction-for-Benefit-Fraud.-Please-Help.&p=3972658#post3972658

 

I think this is only putting off the invertible Possession order ending in eviction.

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suspend Possession order granted to Housing Association http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?361109-Eviction-for-Benefit-Fraud.-Please-Help.&p=3972658#post3972658

 

I think this is only putting off the invertible Possession order ending in eviction.

 

Suspended possession usually means the eviction won't take place along as certain terms are met - like making payments and getting housing benefit in place. would guess if it isn't in place within the time period or the suspension, then the possession order will go ahead - unless there is convincing evidence of the potential success of appeal of the new claim. I did have a client with in excess of 2K arrears and managed to hold off on eviction until the appeal had been heard - but I went to the possession proceedings myself as a benefit adviser and argued for her myself and explained the appeal issues to the judge - but it wasn't a LTAHAW case, it was a right to reside case, and I managed to get the hearing adjouned each time rather than getting a suspended possession order as there were potential HB arrears involved aswell, which helps.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suspended possession usually means the eviction won't take place along as certain terms are met - like making payments and getting housing benefit in place. would guess if it isn't in place within the time period or the suspension, then the possession order will go ahead - unless there is convincing evidence of the potential success of appeal of the new claim. I did have a client with in excess of 2K arrears and managed to hold off on eviction until the appeal had been heard - but I went to the possession proceedings myself as a benefit adviser and argued for her myself and explained the appeal issues to the judge - but it wasn't a LTAHAW case, it was a right to reside case, and I managed to get the hearing adjourned each time rather than getting a suspended possession order as there were potential HB arrears involved as well, which helps.

 

The main problem is HB.

 

The tenant has already had a IUC on alleged HB fraud there little if No chance at all of HB been reinstated before court hearing and council are after 5 or 6 years worth of CT..

 

Think housing association just want possession now so they can re let to new tenant ....1aK+F4PJ7cBm32CUNiyI2GAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC

Edited by 45002

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The main problem is HB.

 

The tenant has already had a IUC on alleged HB fraud there little if No chance at all of HB been reinstated before court hearing and council are after 5 or 6 years worth of CT..

 

Think housing association just want possession now so they can re let to new tenant ....1aK+F4PJ7cBm32CUNiyI2GAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC

 

Yes, absolutely that's what the housing association want - but having come up against a council who wanted the tenant out at all costs - even doing some really reprehensible stuff - a good argument on the likelihood of a HB award being made at appeal, can be very effective on a judge. they really don't want to evict people unless they really have to. Obviously we really don't know the truth of what's been said, but the housing association will be limited as to what evidence they can present that the new claim won't succeed, as they won't have access to any data from the fraud investigation. If positive evidence can be presented that the ex in question is currently living elsewhere, then a good benefit/housing adviser could convince a judge to continue suspended possession.

 

Sadly i've seen HB appeals officers with no evidence of current fraud though there may be past fraud), refuse a current claim, even knowing it will get overturned at appeal, and that in the meantime the person will in all probability get evicted - like an extra punishment they are giving out for the fraud. One appeals officer definately was doing this as she more or less admitted it, and tried to things to mess the claimant's other valid claims for other benefits.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...