Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Rather like farage .. Reform UK plans ‘don’t add up’ and costings are out ‘by tens of billions of pounds per year’, says IFS – UK general election live | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM As Nigel Farage launches party’s manifesto, Institute for Fiscal Studies says ‘the package as a whole is problematic’  
    • The finance company has a 50% stake (legal Owner) in the deal so I would certainly involve them. As for the outstanding £3635 bill thats owing to Mercedes in Croydon I wouldn't be in a rush to settle that just yet and keep it in abeyance as leverage.  Where are you at with Doves in Horsham ?
    • or go really bold ... Further to my request for a copy of the agreement you refer to on ( date) I made a section 78 request pursuant to the Credit Consumer Act 1974 to which you have yet to reply or respond. Pursuant to the Credit Consumer act 1974 section 78 (6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)— (a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.
    • Pers I'd stop paying the lot and get each defaulted by a dn issuance.  Defaults can't hurt future renting no Only ccj's Can't keep saying the same answers.    Dx        
    • Ok thank you. That’s where we are getting confused, as we’re not sure where we stand legally. But we’re still unsure who we should be going to now, the dealer or the finance company? I’m assuming the evidence we have (the reports from Mercedes) showing that the fault was there when we purchased would be sufficient to prove this? To be honest we would prefer to send the car back completely as are now concerned more problems may arise.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4145 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I shall not go into my longwinded story but facts are, I have been told to make myself bankrupt or one of my debtors are going to do it for me, said it is best if i do it voluntary. I am disabled and on incapacity benefit of £102 per week, that is all i have, my debts include very large overpayments, one from concil, one from counicl tax and the other from dwp. I would like to know if i go bankrupt does this wipe everything including dwp amount? Can my benefit be affected? do they also come to your home and reposses possesions? not that i have any just basic stuff. Any help would be greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only difference in who petitions for bankrupty is who pays for it. If the DWP or council whom you seem to owe it won't cost you anything, whereas if you apply you will need to pay £575 assuming you would get the £125 court fee waived due to income. The only advantage of applying yourself is it places you in control of the timescale, otherwise no reason not to let them do it for you and save the hassle of the fees.

 

Unfortunately, many overpayments are not included in bankruptcy if the overpayment was not the fault of the payer. So if you failed to disclose change of circumstances or income or something and this led to the overpayment then bankruptcy will not end the debt.

 

The better news is the official receiver does not take any of your income if it solely consists of means tested benefits with the possible addition of DLA.

 

The official receiver would only place a claim on possessions if they were valuable and not everyday household goods. So they are interested in jewellry, antiques, your car (unless it is deemed exempt) etc. and would not take every day belongings such as your TV, sofa, cooker etc.

 

If all of your debt is overpayment and the overpayment was made due to failure to disclose change of circumstances or you claimed with incorrect information in the first place however, the bankruptcy will not end the debt and you will still be liable for the debt after discharge. If you have nothing they can claim wrt assets or income, it is often not worth making you bankrupt and many organisations won't do it.

 

You will of course transfer from incapacity benefit to employment support allowance at some stage.

Edited by abc123def
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bankruptcy will wipe the Council Tax Debt, however, DWP debts for either overpayment/loans from the social fund etc. are excluded from Bankruptcy will you will remain libel to continue payments/pay the amount back.

 

Who advised you to go Bankrupt and pay for it yourself instead of a creditor?

 

Your Benefits will not be effected in any way, the only issue you will have is to open up a new bank account, both Co-op and Barclay's offer basic bank accounts that are Bankrupt friendly.

 

No one will come to your house and start repossessing items unless they are of a high value.

The Official Receiver will have to take into account, the replacement value of a cheaper product (i.e. replacing your Picasso with a printed version) and this also includes the collection, storage and auction costs.

 

Stigman

NEVER telephone a DCA

If a DCA rings you, refuse to go through the security questions & hang up!

 

If I have helped you, click on the star & say thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your repies.

It was the council who told me it was in my best interest to go bankrupt or they would do it, i owe 14000 council and 8000 council tax about 14000 dwp and thats not on top of all the other debt i have, my head is spinning, so is it best i just leave for them to make me bankrupt rather than doing it myself? i do not have any monies to pay for bankruptcy, out of my 102 a week i have 4 pounds to live on

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Have a look at this link for the Insolvency Service: http://www.bis.gov.uk/insolvency/personal-insolvency/bankruptcy-debts#council-tax-arrears

 

Please read this part from that site about Council Tax :-

 

What happens to my council tax arrears in a bankruptcy?

Certain amounts of council tax are classed as provable debts in bankruptcy. These are:

 

All arrears outstanding at the date of the bankruptcy.

  • The monthly instalment for the month in which you were made insolvent where, at the date of the bankruptcy order, the day on which that payment is due has passed and the payment has not been made.
  • Where you have failed to comply with a reminder notice. This would mean the whole amount of the council tax for the year is due and payable, so the whole sum is a provable debt in a bankruptcy.

NB Where there have been no unpaid reminder notices or instalments due there is no provable debt in a bankruptcy for Council Tax. This means you must continue to pay your instalments as usual.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bankruptcy will wipe the Council Tax Debt, however, DWP debts for either overpayment/loans from the social fund etc. are excluded from Bankruptcy will you will remain libel to continue payments/pay the amount back.

 

Although Social Fund loan debts are now excluded regular benefit overpayments would still prove within bankruptcy as fas as I believe :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see you may be in Scotland.

 

Look at the AIB website there's lots of info.

In Scotland it costs £200 to be sequestrated (the Scottish term for BR)

 

You can pay the fee by instalments and I would suggest you look at the LILA route -this will not apply if you own your home.

 

Low Income Low Assset route to bankruptcy

 

LILA is the route into bankruptcy for people who have low income and low assets.

Low income means gross weekly income of no more than the standard national minimum wage for a forty hour working week. This is equivalent to £237.20 a week. Any pensions or maintenance payments that you receive are also counted in with your income.

 

If you receive income support, income-based jobseekers' allowance or working tax credits you will be treated as meeting the low income test, even if your actual income is more than £237.20 a week.

When calculating your income no account will be taken of other social security benefits or tax credits you receive or any income paid to another member of your family. However, your income, pensions, maintenance payments, benefits, tax credits and the income of other family members may be taken into account when considering whether you should pay a contribution while you are bankrupt.

Low assets means that you have no single asset worth more than £1,000 and your total assets are not worth more than £10,000. In addition, it means that you must not own or jointly own a house or any other property or land.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although Social Fund loan debts are now excluded regular benefit overpayments would still prove within bankruptcy as fas as I believe :)

 

Not if the overpayments were caused by the claimant not notifying the DWP of a change of circs or claiming incorrectly when they were not eligibe or giving false info etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not if the overpayments were caused by the claimant not notifying the DWP of a change of circs or claiming incorrectly when they were not eligibe or giving false info etc.

 

Fraud would need to be proven, otherwise they would be included :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thank you all so much , i have received advice for CAB about bankruptcy, they actualy noticed a letter which in the middle of satted the overpayment had been reclassified from overpayment to fraud, upon telephoning them i was told i had been reported to procurator fiscal but nothing happened but they have still changed to fraud can this be done when there was no charge

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hallo, I'm not sure whether to start a new thread but as my question concerns Benefits and Bankruptcy I thought I should start here.

 

I am on ESA and had a successful Tribunal appeal on the 22nd Jan of this year. I also took myself to bankruptcy last March (due to be discharged from BR on 29th March 2013, so this year).

 

My worry is that due to my successful appeal, the DWP have not only raised my fortnightly benefits, but have paid backdated money of £1200 into my bank account as owed for the work related component of ESA (I was waiting for tribunal for nearly a year)!

 

I rang my examiner to update her on events and was told that I need to send her details of amounts and also a letter etc. explaining what I intend to use the backdated monies for (she described it as a 'letter of argument') which she will then present to someone in higher position for their consideration. At this time, she herself cannot say whether or not I will be able to keep some or all of this money.

 

Obviously I am quite upset and shocked by this turn of events: to think that I had to go to tribunal (a harrowing experience) only to win BUT then to learn that I have to fight for this relatively small amount of money.

 

The backstory is that I entered bankruptcy on benefits (ESA) with no assets (no property, lands, cars, businesses, children etc) so I was a very straightforward case. I had and have no other income whatsoever: just my fortnightly benefits, and I also get housing benefit and council tax paid.

 

I would be very grateful for any advice as I try to prepare this letter of 'argument' to send to the bankruptcy officer/examiner concerned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...