Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4223 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good morning all,

 

I have recently had an arrangement with stanford & green relating to some overdue council tax for the previous financial year owed to Dartford Borough Council.

 

I was paying them 50 pounds per month, however i missed my last months payment and just thought i would pay this week and didn't think any more about it.

 

I was going out two days ago when someone was about to knock on my door. It was a so called collection officer from Stanford and Green.

 

He explained that i had broken an agreement with them and they would be attending Friday to remove goods to the value of the total outstanding amount, approx 600 pounds.

 

I was rushing so i said i would call him later.

I called him and i explained the situation as to the missed monthly installment,

he wouldn't hear any of it.

I even offered to try and settle the outstanding amount sooner,

and again he was having none of it.

 

He said they would attend my property,

whether i am there or not,

gain entry and remove goods.

 

 

I said i thought this was unfair,

and what would happen if i fail to allow them entry.

 

 

They said i could not stop them from coming in and if necessary they would use contractors and locksmiths to gain entry and would bill me for those as well, and if i was going to be a problem they would seize my vehicle.

 

 

I have since been in touch with a debt management company who where extremely helpful, and they said under no circumstances can they force entry or seize my vehicle.

 

 

I have never allowed them into my property and have never signed anything,

and so on the basis of that,

is it right that they can do nothing except leave me a letter and go!!

 

 

This is extremely worrying,

that companies such as this are allowed to put stuff like this in their literature.

 

Is there any way people can make official complaints regarding this kind of behavior!

 

Regards

Phil

Kent

 

Further to that,

 

I called the office of Stanford and Green and initially spoke to someone, a young lady who could not have been more dismissive if she tried,

 

 

again, didn't want to hear any of it

said that i would now have to deal with the officer in question, [edit].

I then called him again and he wasn't budging and

i just spent the 20 mins or so on the phone to him going round in circles.

 

 

I was by now furious,

and called the office again,

this time managing to speak to [edit].

 

 

I did expect some kind of explanation from him,

i also explained to him that Stanford and Green have all my contact details and i asked why they simply hadn't contacted me to chase the outstanding payment.

 

 

No answer was given apart from [edit] saying to me that they do not have to make arrangements and they only do that out of courtesy and again, deal only with the officer.

 

I called the officer back.

No answer.

5 missed calls,

one voice mail and a txt and nothing.

 

 

So there doesn't appear so be any professional courtesy at all,

among any member of staff.

 

Regards

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is so worrying that there is so much wrong information being given out by companies. That is one reason why everyone should amke sure that they come to THIS FORUM.

 

Yes, a bailiff can seize your car. This is most common item to be seized. However, if the vehicle is subject to finance etc or is worth very little, this would be a different matter all together. Maybe your car is worth £10k. We do not know.

 

The reason why the bailif has come to the house is firstly becuase you had failed to keep to a payment arrangment and secondly, UNLESS he visits, he cannot make any money from this account. By failing to make payment you have made it very easy for him.

 

The threat of locksmith is serious as it is WRONG as a bailiff may ONLY force entry if there had been a PRIOR VALID LEVY made on goods and you had failed to adhere to the payment arrangement. Even then, he still cannot simply force entry.

 

Also, it never ceasing to amaze me that people keep relying upon calling bailiffs on a mobile or by phone. WRITE TO THEM "" All bailiff comapnies have email access.

 

If you do not have a car that a bailiff can levy upon and you REFUSE to allow the bailiff to come into your home, then the fees that he can charge are LIMITED to a maximum of £42.50 for "attending to levy" (where no levy was made).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hallo mate, thanks for the info.

 

I have emailed them in the past if i was going to be a day late or so with a payment, and indeed that was one of my arguments to mr stanford when i called him. I asked why didnt they simply get in touch with me the way i had been in touch with them in the past. I got no answer.

 

I also asked regarding fees. And it was explained to me that if the bailif does not get entry (which they wont), then there fees are between 145.00 and 190.00. So would you say im being slightly overcharged?

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they want to take the 'send in the Neaderthal' approach then fight back and start paying the Council direct on line. This is now classed as a non priority debt and you do not have to enter into excessive repayment plans with the bailff.

 

TT has given the best advice ever..... refuse them entry to your home, do not let them find anything they can levy on outside and the Maximum they can add is £42.50.

 

Your car if not on finance it is a target but, if they have not yet levied upon it you have the right to 'sell' it to a friend or relative. Once the V5 has been sent to the DVLA then the car is no longer yours for them to levy upon.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi all, hope all are well. Just thought id update as to whats happened and happening with regard to my council tax probs. After the problems i was having i eventually wrote to Dartford Borough Council and explained the problems i had been having and explained what Stanford & Green were up to, and the council wrote back informing me that they were prepared to take the debt back from them, however, i wish i had not bothered.

 

After explaining to me that Dartford Council were taking the debt back, they then informed me they were putting not one but two attachment of earnings in place. After waiting to see how much i would loose, they were proposing taking over £500 per month off of me! I contacted them straight away and said there was no way i could afford this, they then said they would send me a means and expenditure form and that i was to complete it and enclose bank statements and payslips along with an accompanying letter. This i did and waited. In the accompanying letter i explained that i was unable to afford even one deduction as even with one deduction in place me and my partner have -£30.00 per week left to live one. I also explained that my partner is unable to work because of health, but we are unable to get benefits because i apparently earn too much.

 

I offered to pay the council £50.00 per month. I explained that paying this amount would enable me to stay on top of current expenses, and that includes council tax for the current financial year. The council refused to take 50 pounds per month from me saying that it would take too long for the debt to clear. I asked them to explain why it is acceptable for the council to take 50 pounds per month from their appointed bailiff on my behalf but not from me directly. They said something regarding service level agreements, but nothing that made any sense. They then wrote to me saying that they would only put one order through, taking approx 250 pounds per month from my wages. I explained again to the council that i was unable to afford this and if this deduction goes ahead u would not be able to pay the council tax for the current financial year! I have heard nothing from them since.

 

I have received no analysis or judgement on my means and expenditure form, i have explained that collecting the debt in this was amounts to enforced bankruptcy. I have also been sending all documentation to my local mp who has also been querying this with Dartford Coucil, but like myself, that have not received a response from them. I Wrote to them over two weeks ago asking them for an explanation as to how they analysis the means form, i also asked that the last order be stopped. I also explained that i have just had to default on the council tax for the current year, and reiterated that this would happen as a result of the deductions.

 

Neither myself or the caseworker for the local MP have received a response from the council in over 2 weeks. I think they are ignoring my communications. I was going to email and write to them again, but where can i go from here!

 

I cant afford a solicitor myself and if these deductions don't stop im going to start having problems with my rent.

 

Any help would be appreciated peeps.

 

Hope all are well.

Kind regards

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know how much you owe as confirmed by the Council? How many Liability Orders are there? You need to speak to someone at the Council and ask the following questions:

1 - how many Liability Orders they have against you

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the addresses they were for

4 - the period of time each covers

5 - how much each one was for

6 - how much is still outstanding

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement

8 - the dates & amounts of any payments

 

Have you made any payments since posting on here? If the Council decide to go ahead with AoE then there is little you can do to stop them. They do have other alternatives all of which you do not want - Charging Order, if you own your home & yes they will go for an Order for Sale, Bankruptcy or even Committal to Prison, all of which they will charge the costs of doing.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In your initial post you appear to indicate that the debt outstanding to the council is £600. Can you confirm the correct position and could you also find out what fees have been added to your account by the bailiff company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, and thanks for your replies.

 

I am no longer dealing with the bailiff, and as for the council, they have already out the attachment of earnings in place. Initially they put in place two orders, and were taking over £140 pounds per week from me! Upon returning the means form to them they reduced it to just one order of approx £78 pounds, however thats still over £200 pounds per month i cannot afford!

 

The property i live in is a council property, and so they cannot secure the debt on that. My wage isnt bad if it was part of a joint income but its not. My wife has been under the mental health act for years, and cannot work as a result, however we gave up trying to claim benefits years ago as they said i apparently earn too much.

 

I have even been writing to the local MP who has also been communicating with Dartford Council regarding this and he has had no reply from them either.

 

Anyone got any ideas as to what i can do from here?

 

Regards

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought id bump this one to see if anyone has any ideas. I was thinking about ringin the council as my letters and emails seem to be getting ignored, and i know that they record all conversations, but didnt know if that was wise or not!.

 

Phil

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...