Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Housing Benefit Fraud Investigation


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4369 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm in a world of worry and really do not know what to do.

 

I had been claiming benefits since 2003. I suffer from severe arthritis and had been in receipt of Incapacity Benefit, Housing and Council Tax Benefit up untill June 2011. I am still in receipt of DLA.

 

Last year, a friend of mine offered to train me in an administrative job in his Company which I started on 1st June 2011. I subsequently signed off my benefits and started paying my rent and council tax.

 

In April of 2011 I received a letter from the Council stating they had cause to believe that I had not advised them in a change in my circumstances and was under investigation. They have looked into my bank statements back to December 2006 and seen that more money has gone into my bank than I received in benefits. I explained the reason in writing to them.

 

I am a single father of 3. I have joint custody of my children but my ex-wife has always claimed their benefits. This meant that I was not entitled to claim any help for them. It was impossible for me to do my bit for them on the benefits I received. My sister paid for their mobile phones, Sky TV and anything else she could for them. She gave me the money for this which went into my account to pay direct debits.

 

Before my illness struck I was quite well off and built up various collections of memorabillia. I sold all these off over the past 5 or 6 years on Ebay or at car boot sales to raise money to support my kids. Paypal payments for these sales also went into my bank. I also sold things on my ebay account for friends. Not for profit, they paid the fees, thats it! These paypal payments also went through my bank account. I also had loans from friends and family, credit cards, etc. I am in serious debt.

I have explained to the Investigator that just because money has gone through my account it does not mean it's all mine! Also, I don't see how selling my belongings to put food on the table can be classed as income, I sold things out of necessity .

 

I was advised not to attend the interviews under caution due to my mental state.

 

I have received a benefit overpayment bill of £17000:00 for the past 5 years and also an intimidating letter from the investigator saying he is pushing for a criminal prosecution.

 

The stress from all the worry is affecting my illness which in turn is affecting my ability to work. I don't want to have to give up work and end up back on benefits. I don't know where to turn. I'm in the depths of depression and I know I couldn't cope with a court case.

 

I need to know if loans, sale of belongings or financial help from friends and family can be classed as income? Any advice would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm so sorry to hear this. So were the only means tested benefits you were on Housing and council tax benefit?

 

Maybe looking into your bank accounts they're trying to pin you as trading back then. Yes you know It's all your own stuff, but maybe they're choosing to ignore that.

 

Also I suspect any income seen going into your bank accounts regularly would end up effecting any means tested benefits.

 

May I ask what kind of amounts are we talking about here?

Edited by sadone
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, I was also claiming Incapacity Benefit for those periods. I have heard nothing from the DWP or HMCR regarding it. I suppose, including with my incapacity benefit and DLA there was average £1400 per month going through. £150 of this was from my sister for the kids. Also paypal for friends at times. In their calculations they have not taken into account that my benefits were part of this ammount. Their figures are badly flawed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was it contributions based IB or Income based?

 

I think that they will be concerned about that amount regularly going in I'm afraid. Fine for all none means tested benefits, but a problem for any income based, particularly as It's seen to be a large regular amount.

 

I for example have been on CB based IB for a few years and also sold off my old business assets and memorabilia to pay my rent, but I wasn't claiming any means tested benefits during that entire time.

Edited by sadone
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help.

I'm afraid it's gone past that stage now. I've not heard anything for around 6 weeks now, just waiting for the bomb to drop. Guess I will have to hope that the Court will look sympathetically at the case. I have very little now, my main priority was to give my kids what they needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really do think you need legal advice. You should check and see If you're entitled to free legal aid. Not trying to scare you, but most councils these days go to town on what they perceive to be fraud cases, so you'll need all the help you can muster.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add have you done a proper breakdown of what the money going in amounted to? I think you need to do that asap really. Get accurate figures together so you can offer them up when the council start throwing theirs about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see how they have reached the decision that your benefit has been overpaid.

 

They can see from your bank statements that you have income from other sources - they will have information from PayPal and Ebay that you have been trading on there and when asked to attend for an interview you declined to do so. No-one can force you to do and you have your reasons for not going.

 

However, in the absence of any other explanation they have treated all the money coming in to your accounts as income from either ebay trading or from an undeclared source. They are not to know that this is supposed to be money from your family to help you to pay off debts.

 

If the amount of the overpayment is £17,000 then your case will be referred to solicitors to explore whether there is sufficient evidence to prosecute. I doubt very much whether it is a threatening letter from the investigator as they tend to be standard letters which are sent out just to inform you what might happen next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to appeal the overpayment. Make an appointment with your local welfare rights (or failing that CAB) and attend with all your paperwork. It's their job to know the ins and outs of what counts as income/what is classed as capital. Because of the length of time these things take (appeals) I would get on that pronto.

 

You want to do a forensic analysis of the time in question, and nail down what each and every payment is going in to your account, and your outgoings. If you have sold things for friends, ask them to confirm this in writing for you. This will make the Welfare Rights Adviser's job a bit easier (in the sense that they have an explanation for your bank statements).

 

I'm not an expert, but I believe that private loans (that aren't career development loans) can count as capital, and are subject to the same capital rules. So, if you have more than 6k sitting in your account then this will affect your benefit.

 

Once the WR adviser has a full picture, he or she may be able to liaise with the fraud investigations officer, although if this is already in the hands of the prosecutor, then perhaps the latter.

 

Secondly, you should still consult a solicitor, experienced in welfare law (use YELL and e-mail all the solicitors in your area asking if they have specific experience in this area). Even if you cant afford one, it might be useful to go in for an initial consultation.

 

A solicitor might be able to try an intercession, although in your case, you might also be needing the solicitor to explain your situation to the court. You certainly need legal advice at this stage, though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply. As I did not attend an interview I did send them a detailed letter as to my situation and all the ins and outs. I am not a dishonest person, I have been upfront with them in this letter. I also explained as to why I would not attend the interview.

As for the letter, it was very threatening. Trying to bully me into an interview and demanding I contact him. So much so, a friend commented that it seemed he was desperate to gather more evidence from me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Stan, I've still not heard if it's going to Court as yet. I'm working as self employed at present for very little money. There are not enough hours in the day as it is, time to sort things is a problem. If I take time off we don't eat, it's that simple. I really don't have anyone to physically help me.

I have never had any money in my account apart from day to day living funds. Any loans were used for necessities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, the wheels of the machine turn very very slowly. Your overpayment (on the surface) seems to big enough that the LA/DWP prosecutor/CPS will take a very hard look at the evidence before them. It could be weeks or months before a court date pops through the door.

 

I have heard of prosecutors not pushing forward with cases that 'aren't in the public interest'; one potential way to convince them off that is to see if WRs or (more likely) a solicitor can lobby on your behalf.

 

I appreciate that things are very hard for you but I would urge you to see (at least) the Welfare Rights/CAB to get the ball rolling on challenging the overpayment.

 

There is a lot of pressure just now on investigators to hit targets. I'm not saying that they are all corrupt -- I'm sure they have a difficult job themselves-- but from my own anecdotal experience on here there are a lot of vulnerable people who end up getting chewed up because they've made mistakes, and then once these mistakes come to light, don't have the resources or wherewithal to fight it.

 

You can help yourself by speaking to an expert in your area; do try and speak to your local WRs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see how they have reached the decision that your benefit has been overpaid.

 

They can see from your bank statements that you have income from other sources - they will have information from PayPal and Ebay that you have been trading on there and when asked to attend for an interview you declined to do so. No-one can force you to do and you have your reasons for not going.

 

Actually, the DWP can get the Police to arrest you in order to interview you and then the Police are usually involved in the process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that! The DWP have nothing to do with it.
Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit are DWP benefits administered by local authorities on behalf of DWP. Local Authority Benefit Fraud investigators use the same powers and legislation as DWP investigators. None of this may be what you want to hear but I'm telling you as it is.

Additionally, LA investigators will approach the DWP with details of the allegation and ask DWP if any other offences have been committed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, the DWP can get the Police to arrest you in order to interview you and then the Police are usually involved in the process.

 

My understanding is that this is rare: the original poster did write to them explaining why he would not be attending the interview, and tried to provide some explanation of his financial transactions. It is not as if this was a case of 'radio silence'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It may effect the IB, if the OP has been trading on Ebay it may be classed as self employment, it could be ref to a Decision Maker to see if this would have been accepted as permitted work, if it is accepted then no problem and it would be subject to the permiited work rules.

If not there could be a problem.

 

DLA it has no effect

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...