Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to cover yourself, you should write them a letter in response telling them that you are rejecting their offer. That they know full well that their insurance is an attempt to limit or exclude liability contrary to section 57 Consumer rights act and is a secondary contract contrary to section 72.  By the way was the offer made without prejudice or in confidence or anything? Maybe you could post up their offer here please
    • "Dear HR, I refer to my correspondence of *date* in which I challenged xxx, copy attached. Clearly this was a grievance, and yet does not seem to have been heard under the grievance procedure. I am exceptionally dismayed that this 'review'. which never took place, seems to be being used as a criteria in redundancy selection proceedings. As this is time critical, please advise asap."            
    • Just to update, received a revised offer of £75 from P2G after they got my LOC last Friday. They stated that because it was not insured this would be their final offer. Looks like we are going to court.
    • and speaking of cover-ups .. from the environment agency with collusion/negligence  from the ICO   Environment Agency chief admits regulator buries freedom of information requests Speaking at the UK River Summit, Philip Duffy said officials do not want to reveal the true ‘embarrassing’ environmental picture ICO - waffle Environment Agency chief admits regulator buries freedom of information requests | Environment Agency | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Speaking at the UK River Summit, Philip Duffy said officials do not want to reveal the true ‘embarrassing’ environmental picture   Environment Agency ‘hiding’ report into Lancashire landfill making locals ill Exclusive The agency has refused to share details of how a landfill operator is breaching its permit because it could 'potentially cause unnecessary concern'    Environment Agency ‘hiding’ report into Lancashire landfill making locals ill INEWS.CO.UK The agency has refused to share details of how a landfill operator is breaching its permit because it could 'potentially cause unnecessary...  
    • As Dan Neidle pointed out on Twitter/X, pensioners used to have a higher personal allowance before they paid tax, but this government removed it a few years ago.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Constructive dismissal? - ** SETTLED **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3926 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 489
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi DJ, it is very good of you to have left a trail of events for your claim, so that folks like me going through a similar case can find useful info and indeed inspirations from your experiences.

 

I have a quick question regarding this paragraph:

 

"The respondent have also submitted an application to amend their grounds of resistance in relation to the discovery that I had forwarded two emails and a financial settlement agreement to my personal email address and that of my wife, roughly one month before I resigned..."

 

How did your Employer discover your emails in question? Did they go through your old emailbox? If so, is that allowed?

 

AGY

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi AGY,

 

Really glad that you are able to get something from my experience and that is the whole reason for this excellent site. By sharing our experience we are able to help others who find themselves in the same horrific position can learn so much more. I too had a lot of help from the members on here while I was going through my experience and without question I could never have got through the nightmare without the fellow members of this site as I did not have any legal representation until near the very end.

 

Yes they have the right to go through your email address as it is on their server and therefore belongs to them and you can bet your bottom dollar they will have gone through it with a fine tooth comb.

 

Unfortunately this is not how they found out though. It was through my own carelessness at the disclosure of bundle stage I included the emails in my bundle. Looking back now I was under so much stress as the respondent were trying every trick in the book to get me to drop the case, or have it thrown out of court.

 

I hope never to have to go through all of that again and would definitely tell anyone now going through it to have a solicitor go through the bundle if at all possible. Even if that is all you have them do, they are experienced and much more knowledgeable about what does and does not have to be disclosed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Billy,

 

Completely forgot to update the thread.

 

Yes I contacted the respondents solicitor and they sent payment by courier that evening.

 

Thanks

DJ

 

Hi DJ,

 

I completely forgot to check this thread, congratulations! Bet you are glad that is over, take all the paperwork and burn it!

 

All the best

 

Onwards and upwards CAG soldiers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Billyboy,

 

I could not have done it without the unending support and guidance from fellow caggers like yourself.

 

I was over the moon about the outcome and although I did not get my day in court, this was the best possible outcome and the compensation was what I had said I would settle for at the very beginning.

 

Believe me I had a big bonfire in the garden a few days later and it felt so good destroy all the evidence.

 

Once again a big thank you. Without people like yourself this site would not be the raging success that it is.

 

 

Best Wishes

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Although this case has been settled through negotiations via ACAS back in April 2013 I have a question on which I would like to hear others experience and any suggestions that can be offered.

 

Part of the agreed settlement was that my former employer would provide upon request a reference to any prospective employer. The exact content of the reference was also agreed as part of the settlement agreement.

 

However I am having quite some difficulty in finding new emplyment, although I accept that is not unusual in the current economic climate. However I have registered with a couple of agencies and even been interviewed for a couple of positions, all good so far. The stumbling block seems to come when I am asked for references and of course put my previous employer, after that I hear nothing more. Get all sorts of excuses like we have no vacancies at the moment, or the employer has withdrawn the vacancy and decided not to recruit, or they have decided to recruit internally.

 

I have a very strong suspicion that my previous employer is giving a reference different to the one agreed in the settlement agreement and worse still I think she is giving it verbally over the telephone, so no trace of paperwork or anything.

 

Has anyone else had experience of this? Anyone have any suggestions on what I could do?

 

Is really getting me down that I still have not found a new job and if as I suspect the previous employer is not playing as agreed, this is completely unfair and surely voids the settlement agreement?

 

Appreciate any suggestions, help or advice anyone can offer.

 

 

Many thanks

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

problem is, there is not much you can do without evidence. Got any self employed mates who might need a reference for you perhaps?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Emmzi,

 

I do have a friend who is Financial Controller of a company and could write a reference request. My only concern is if it came back they have broken the agreement, would I have to reveal where I had obtained the reference from and would there be any consequences for my friend?

 

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was afraid you were going to say that.

 

I did register with 3 different agencies who all asked for a reference from my previous employer and then heard nothing more from the agencies, no job offers and they will not respond to my communications. So I have sent a SAR to all 3.

 

It is a real shot it the dark that anything will show up on the SAR, but I am at a loss to know what else to do.

 

Thanks

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know that they never reply when you submit an application for a position they have advertised, but this is different in that I have registered with them and they are not contacting me with any opportunities.

 

One of the agencies had actually contacted me and asked me to apply for a vacancy they were recruiting for. The agent really liked my cv and sent an application form which I completed and returned to them. He contacted me a couple of days later saying he was very impressed with my application and was confident he could get me an interview, we even met to go through my interview skills. Then nothing..........

 

I left it for a few days and then contacted him but he is not taking my calls or responding to my emails.

 

Am convinced my former employer is providing negative feedback on me and is therefore in breach of the settlement agreement. Will just have to wait for the SAR's to come back and see what they bring up.

 

DJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been to third interviews and the agency hasn't called back... Just saying it may be nothing. Not sure SARS are the image you wish to present I.e. argumentative

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...