Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CTB & HB over payment - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4380 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Right, where to start.

 

Back last year my sister received a letter from the council requesting the last 3 months worth of payslips for her HB claim.

She sent these in, waited 2 weeks and was then sent a letter saying she had been overpaid HB and CTB for the past 3 yrs

Totalling £4k

She disputed this

 

when she had started her new job (3 yrs previous) and filled in a HB &CTB form

she over estimated her earning at £7ph working 22 hr per week (written manually on form)

as she knew she's be working between 16-20 per week. (new job was as a care worker various shifts not set hrs as such)

 

As she had only been in the job 3 weeks prior she only had a training wage slip (not full wages)

 

when council asked her at this stage for a wage slip she told them (verbally) that it would show a lower amount

due to it being a training wage and to take any calculations as £7ph 22 hrs per week.

 

time passes and she receives letters every so often which she glances at and as circumstances hadn't changed presumed they were correct (v stupid i know)

 

Fast forward to where we were at the start of this ramble and

 

the council wrote not only saying she had been overpaid benefits but requesting proof of income yadda yadda.

She called the council to arrange to pay back the debt as even after disputing the charges was told no, you owe us.

 

Arranged to pay back the overpayment of HB @ £10 per week.

 

When calling to pay back the CTB overpayment was told she would have to wait for a summons letter before they would look at an agreement to pay

accruing another £80 for each overpayment period (4)

 

Had no other option as they wouldn't accept anything less than the full payment without a summons letter (sounds ridiculous to me)

 

A few weeks later she received a letter calling her for a meeting with the fraud investigation team at the council, along she went.

 

They asked her lots of questions and said she would hear an outcome of meeting in 2-6 weeks.

This was feb time.

 

Heard this week that they are taking her to court at the beginning of Aug for fraud despite at this time having and keeping to an arrangement to pay.

 

What will they achieve by this?

 

being a care worker if she is prosecuted she will lose her job with this on her record and they're getting their money back now!

 

They have also told her to seek legal advice.

 

This brings me onto the CT.

 

Have heard nothing then they send her a letter asking for £80 (which she hasn't got, she had already sent 2 means test forms in to them in the past 6 months)

 

she went there today to try and sort out a plan and they have told her it's in the hands of the bailiffs!

 

 

Bit of background,

she has 2 kids,

works part time eves as a careworker for the elderly and suffers from severe anxiety and depression (I suspect it to be ME)

she buries her head in the sand (See full story above)

and at the first sight of a problem she hides.

 

She also will not speak to anyone by phone so i have to do all this for her.

 

 

I guess the questions are where does she stand?

Is she likely to go to prison?

get a fine?

and if the bailiffs come knocking due to non payment what then?

 

h she tells me she doesn't have enough money to live on let alone pay these debts...

 

As said any advice would be good as i have never been in this sort of situation so can't really offer her any constructive advice.

 

(She is however going to CAB for a 15min slot in 2 weeks to see if she is entitiled to legal aid)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sis

 

Welcome to CAG

 

The guys will be happy to advise as soon as they are available.

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers.

 

Thread has been moved to the correct forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I'm not an expert so I can really only make a couple of simple points. First off, we need to note that there are two separate issues here: fraud (which is a criminal offence), and overpayment of benefits (which is not). The two will be treated separately, and it's quite possible to be found not guilty of fraud but still have a recoverable overpayment.

 

Regarding the court case - she is absolutely doing the right thing in attempting to seek legal assistance. I would say this is critical. For the amount in question, prison is extremely unlikely, but she should be represented by someone who knows what they're doing.

 

Regarding the overpayment, I think it might be best to take this to a welfare rights adviser with a view to appealing to an independent tribunal. This, of course, applies only if she still believes that the council is mistaken in their calculations.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...