Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes, send a message to the purchaser but keep it very friendly and simply that you noticed that the package has now been delivered.  I suggest that you ask them if they want to keep the package still or if they would rather return it and that if they want to keep it then please will they return your payment to you to your PayPal address. Keep it as polite and friendly as possible and then we will decide what to do if he doesn't reply or refuses.  Meanwhile I will have a look at Google earth and see if you are able to spot the gas meter outside the house to get an idea if the delivery is real. Get a screenshot
    • Santander have sent their final response and have agreed that they were in the wrong. They will be refunding me the amount I am due and £50 for the delay.  Just the interest factor would be more than double the £50 that they are offering. Thinking to just close this and move on. Is this what you would do?  Opened a FOS case on the 1st of June but haven't heard back yet. 
    • It just been delivered and ive had a live chat with p2g to get some proof of deliverey and they send me a picture of the parcel placed in a gas meter box which they class as a ' 'Safe Place'  and not placed into the hands of the buyer which is either a good thing as the buyer can claim he never received It so i can claim against p2g or a bad thing . Do p2g have coordinators when taking pictures and scanning of parcels ?  I know Royal Mail do ... I'm going to send the buyer a message and see what he says
    • Eight in ten voters support blocking bonuses for polluting water firm bosses INEWS.CO.UK Polling for i exposes level of public anger over sewage dumping  
    • Wow thats incredible. Thank you so much
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Yorkshire Water Plumbing & Drainage Insurancs


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5319 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Last friday I had the misfortune to have a water leak in the bathroom;so I dug out the Insurance policy which stated that we were covered for up to 2 claims per year, and if the plumber didnt arrive in 2 hours after making the call I could claim the premium back. I rang the number on the policy, it was a to a company called homeserve, that was at approx 2-45pm. At 6-45 the plumber arrived apologised for taking so long to get here, I showed him the leak which was in a cupboard. he then asked me if I had a torch so he could see it properly ( what kind of plumber doesnt have a torch ) He took one look at the leak and said he couldnt mend it has he did not have the appropriate part with him. He then rang his boss to tell him that he could not do the job and would have to come back on the monday. he also told him that that would make it 2 journeys and he would only get paid for one and he wasn't happy about it. He then asked me if he could borrow a knife ( what for I dont know ) so I had to leave leave the bathroom to get one. When I got back he said I've found another leak it was on a capping nut on another pipe it took him a matter of seconds to tighten it up. He then said his boss wanted to speak to me. his boss told me that as he had found a 2nd leak it would constitute another claim so I could not claim again on this policy.I said I think thats stupid he replied thats the way the policy works. the leak was fixed on Monday and no doubt the plumber gets paid for the 2 call outs.I have written a complaint letter to Homeserve. has anyone else experienced anything else like this

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt that very much. If your w/machine breaks down, and the engineer find that the motor is gone, then sees that the coin trap is blocked, would that make it 2 claims? No. It is ONE occurrence of the w/machine breaking down. Or if you get burgled, is it 2 claims to have the door fixed AND your TV replaced? Of course not.

 

See what they reply to your letter first. Have a thorough read of your insurance docs as well to see what constitutes a claim according to them, and take it from there. It may be that you'll need to go to the Ombudsman for arbitration, or maybe not.

 

I would also cast some serious doubts on the 2nd leak, which you hadn't seen, although you obviously had had a good look at the pipes, and appeared quite by magic, with no proof beyond the plumber's word. "Oh, there was another leak, I've fixed it now"??? That stinks, IMO. A proper reputable plumber would have said: "there's another leak here, I'll show you, I'll sort it out now".

 

The more I think of it, the more I am dubious about the whole 2 claims thing. Double-check your policy wording, post it here if you need help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a phone phone call today from Homeserve's Customer Relations, they said they fully agree with my letter of complaint and as a result they will refund my premium of £64 and also cancel the second claim.

I think that was a good result, 12 months free plumbing & drainage insurance.

My faith in complaining has been retored

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I have recently had to ask for HomeServe Plumbing and Drainage (as promoted to me by Yorkshire Water) to attend because of a leaking tank. I am a paid up member of several years standing.

 

I wasn't sure if I would be covered, but they told me that I was. Bearing in mind that they advertise a two-hour response time it is staggering that I have been waiting for a month for a response. (Will it ever end?)

 

I have called them innumerable times, waited in for non-existent personnel to make house calls that have not materialised. I have been lied to many times and each of the two companies that together call themselves 'HomeServe' blame the other.

 

If you value your mental health, DO NOT take up any insurance with HomeServe!!

 

My dealings with them are definitely having an adverse effect on my sanity.

 

Please heed my warning!!! I am not joking!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

As I'm in the industry discussed in this thread, there are a number of points:

 

1) Response times are designed to keep you hooked in. If they say it will take 2 weeks, you will go elsewhere. Legally, there is very little you can do unless you have a written appointment. Verbal indications of attendance can be dismissed (van broke down, on another job, etc etc)

 

2) If signing up to agreements such as Plumbing and Drainage cover, or heating cover, only do so with a company who is FSA regulated. The FSA come down very hard on those accredited if they make a mistake, and fines are massive. If you are with an FSA company (Homeserve is by the way), attempt to resolve cleanly first, and if no joy, send a letter advising of a reasonable (ie 14 days) timescale for expected resolution, or you will be informing of the FSA of their neglet of duty in "Treating CUstomers Fairly". This is the FSA buzzword of the moment, and guaranteed to get action.

 

3) Read the exclusions on your policy! You will certainly not be covered for every eventuality, but loopholes exist - mains supply water pipes being lead, not copper is a prime example. The insurer will not want to pay out for relaying pipework to current standard, then making your driveway nice and pretty if they can help it.

 

4) Home Emergency INsurance policies have a claim rate of 2-5%. Therefore for every 100 policies they sign up, only 5 will make a claim. Calculate how much you spend a year and times that by a hundred. Then times that amount by 5. Whats the difference (ie the PROFIT to the company)? SO do not make unreasonable demands, they will have factored in extraordinary claims.

 

5) Apart from home insurance covers, if you need a tradesperson - go local, and word of mouth is best by a long shot! Find the small advert in the yellow pages, on the web and ring them. The big nationals subcontract - they will pay the contractor the same as that contractor would charge you, but they charge you extra to pay for call centres, big glossy adverts, and of course, profit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your very helpful posting. What you say makes a lot of sense; basically they are only interested in fixing occasional minor problems, and it seems they have a well rehearsed system for fobbing you off if there is any real chance of having to do anything significant.

 

It has taken HomeServe a month of (still!) ongoing leak from the attic tank to tell me that I am not insured; if they had told me that on day one that would have been fine. The ceiling is now in a real mess, it has not YET collapsed!

 

Currently seeking arbitration from the Ombudsman, will invoke FSA, as you suggest, if no joy. I will indeed tell the FSA that HomeServe have failed completely to 'treat customers fairly'.

 

DEFINITELY the worst company I have ever had the misfortune to deal with!! I have also written to Yorkshire Water as the package is labelled 'HomeServe with Yorkshire Water'. Surely Yorkshire Water should feel some responsibility?

 

HomeServe is bad for your health!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Flying G,

 

You won't be alone in this scenario.

 

My best advice at this stage is to write a letter - not a rant - to Homeserve laying out in detail your grievances if you havent done so already.

 

Any records you have of who you spoke to and when will significantly help. So many people complain saying they spoke to someone or other on this day or that - the best company in the world will struggle to satisfy your issues if they cannot investigate fully.

 

Maybe a bit "after the horse is bolted", but any information you can give (check your phone bill?) will help. FSA regulated companies have to record calls for "training and monitoring purposes". Provide in detail that you registered the claim in good faith, and re-iterate what you have detailed in your last post - the lack of decisiveness in validating or repudiating your claim is not good customer service and is not a good example of "Treating Customers Fairly".

 

In this letter, you will need to detail what you expect from the company - be reasonable! Demanding £500 for "stress" will get you nowhere. Explaining you have spent £20 on calls before they rejected your claim (and being able to prove it), and all the while the fault worsened threatening the integrity of your property and possessions will be considered. Are you on a water meter? Recompense for this could be considered as well (again - be reasonable).

 

The FSA will be expecting this kind of information. Homeserve will have the "exclusion clause" to fall back on (and you agreed to this by the way), but the delay and threat to property is the area to focus on. Take photos! Photographic evidence (date stamped if your camera has this facility are highly recommended - I have seen complaints and thought that it was mountain out of a molehill, then seen photos and from a corporate perspective, freaked out!) is superb.

 

As for Yorkshire Water, you have very little recourse from them I would imagine. Your contract is with Homeserve - they have an agreement with every water authority to promote their service via the billing system and are not contracted by Yorkshire to undertake the policy. Its different to Home Insurance - Direct Line contract repair works out for example. Yorkshire just permit Homeserve to promote the policy through them (its kind of an unendorsed promotion - "not our problem, it was your choice to sign up"). It may have a cumulative effect if hundreds complained, but don't forget - you're lumbered with your water supplier. They are not incentivised to deliver superb customer service because you have no alternative, so you are likely to be palmed off I'm afraid.

 

Good luck with the Ombudsman. The "Treating Customers Fairly" route is your best course of action. The notion of "TCF" is a bain to the FSA Regulated!

 

All the Best!:) And sorry for the waffling reply:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Thanks for you very helpful advice. Have now informed HomeServe that I will write to the FSA to inform them that I do not feel that I have been treated fairly.

 

I have only ever asked HomeServe that they honour their original promise to replace my small leaking plastic tank, but now with the added request that they make good the ceiling damaged by the delay. Surely it can't be that big a deal?

 

I have sent HomeServe a CD on which are the conversations that I recorded (not done that before but it did feel that I was being treated extremely badly!).

 

I wait with expectation!

 

Thanks again for your help.

 

I still believe HomeServe is bad for one's health!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...