Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Between yourself and Dave you have produced a very good WS. However if you were to do a harder hitting WS it may be that VCS would be more likely to cancel prior to a hearing. The Contract . VCS [Jake Burgess?] are trying to conflate parking in a car park to driving along a road in order to defend the indefensible. It is well known that "NO Stopping " cannot form a contract as it is prohibitory. VCS know that well as they lose time and again in Court when claiming it is contractual. By mixing up parking with driving they hope to deflect from the fact trying to claim that No Stopping is contractual is tantamount to perjury. No wonder mr Burgess doesn't want to appear in Court. Conflation also disguises the fact that while parking in a car park for a period of time can be interpreted as the acceptance of the contract that is not the case while driving down a road. The Defendant was going to the airport so it is ludicrous to suggest that driving by a No Stopping  sign is tacitly accepting  the  contract -especially as no contract is even being offered. And even if a motorist did not wish to be bound by the so called contract what could they do? Forfeit their flight and still have to stop their car to turn around? Put like that the whole scenario posed by Mr Burgess that the Defendant accepted the contract by driving past the sign is absolutely absurd and indefensible. I certainly would not want to appear in Court defending that statement either. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I will do the contract itself later.
    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
    • Thanks so much FTMDave.  This is so much better   I'm still tempted to leave the blue section in is as if I lose it will at least save me a little bit of money.  But I get your point that it's pretty superfluous.   Thinking I'll get this in the post on Monday unless you think it's worth delaying?   
    • Hi All I have now received a Final Reminder, which I have attached. Can you confirm that I should still ignore this letter and take no further action. It does not appear to say "Letter of Claim" anywhere on the document but I just wanted to check with you all. Many thanks FightUnfairParkingTickets Parking Charge Final Reminder issued 29th May 2024.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PRLIMENARY APPROACH FOR PAYMENT(help!!)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6454 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hello all.

 

we have just received our statements with relatively little fuss, and finally began our quest to seeing exactly how much charges they have taken over the three accounts..

unbelievably from august 11 2002 there is a total of £5360 pounds!!!. This does not even include any interest at this stage .

 

could you please help with my queries as i wish to post the preliminary approach for payment letter but need a few things clarifying.

 

1) i read earlier that should our request for a full refund of charges end up in the small claims court court - we will have to cap OUR CLAIM below £5000 pound as this will exceed the recommended levels.

 

so to avoid either very expensive court costs,(should this happen) would anyone be able to advise if we set our settlement request below the £5k amount or go for the full amount.

 

2)should this go to court should we also make sure the potential interest and charges are included and below the £5k figure.

 

This is starting to get interesting,but cannot afford to pay major court costs for the additional £360. also Any advise on the law on small claims would be very useful.

 

many thanks and hope all you're claims are going well.

adam

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi..

 

I would get the 3 accounts into managable sums because you need to add interest to each charge.If its a credit card you can get back the contractual / compounded rate of interest.Maybe tie 2 together and do the other one separate. They do pay the court fee back anyway.This will keep you below the £5000. It could go fast track if you add all 3 up together and add the interest.Probably won't go that far to court,but always be prepared.

 

Good luck

 

Uk....

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi uk...

 

thanks your speedy reply and wise words.

The charges were all made over a 2 year period, some months over £500 across the accounts, but not many charges on credit cards. Thats another battle for a later date. Looking at the over draft limits and exceeding dates there wont be that much interest to reclaim, unless I'm adding it up on the template wrong.

 

you're advise on separating is much appreciated...

let you know which way we go

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you believe it!!!!, a offer on two accounts have just arrived after only 4 days,but it all seems a bit fast compared to other peoples struggles..

heres how it has gone so far.....

 

Tuesday 03.10.06 sent preliminary approach for payment total £4956 over three accounts.

 

Thursday 05.10.06 received confirmation they have received our request and will investigate and will respond within 40 days.....

 

Saturday 07.10.06 received two offers on two accounts,both as a gesture of goodwill for 6 months worth of charges, one for £1375.00 and one for £887.00

so total amount £2257.00 with the following conditions.

 

"these charges have been offered as a full and final settlement of your complaint"

 

"you have also requested information on how we calculate our costs.we are not obliged under the data protection act to supply this information as it is commercially sensitive,so cannot comply with your request."

 

"If you remain unhappy with your concerns please contact the financial ombudsman service"

 

"to accept our offer please sign and return the enclosed acceptance form"...

 

Help!!!!! what do we do know ...

 

I cannot believe they have made these offers after only a couple of days, and whilst these are pretty generous, they only account for approx 45-50% of the charges made to our acounts....

 

Do we accept the offer, with the possibility of not receiving another improved offer?????

 

Or do we wait till our mentioned deadline in our fist letter and issue the LBA, acknowledging the offers made but demanding the full amount within a further 14 days.?????

 

please any advise will be much aprreciated......

 

thanks Adam and nic

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...