Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

High court walking posession arrived today


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4394 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

I'm hoping I could be given some guidance.

 

I received paperwork today from the high court:

 

. form 55 - notice of seizure

. walking possession agreement

 

The amount is for 16K which is a debt owed to a supplier by my company.

 

In short, we were never paid by our own client, and hence the debt has fallen at our feet.

 

My company hasn't traded for near 2 years now (though its been kept active for future use) and unless things pick up pretty soon,

I'm going to apply for job seekers allowance.

 

The recession single handily ruined my business and all my financial freedom.

 

The bailiff hasn't entered my home (yet) and I haven't signed anything,

I spoke on the phone to him and he said I need to send a proposal of payment to The Sheriffs Office.

 

I'm wondering what to do next?

My company is dormant so should I, at first,

strike it off?

Or should I consider bankruptcy/liquidation.

 

I don't know the best course.

 

Though the debt is registered against the company, the address they attended is my home.

 

I rent the property and as such nothing, apart from my clothes and a TV, belong to me

- how can I be sure they wont attend to take my landlords goods?

 

Should I email a copy of my apartment itinerary to prove 95% of what is here, isn't mine.

 

My vehicle isn't registered in my name or company but I guess I should think about moving it whilst this goes on.

I basically have no assets.

 

Is the best course to register unemployed and make this known to the claimant, go bankrupt or make an offer of repayment as best I can right now.

 

I need to make the claimant understand that any offer I do make, is going to be the only amount I can afford.

 

Certainly if I go bankrupt or register unemployed, the amount offered is going to be ridiculously small, whereas, if I try to claw back my business,

the amount will be certainly a little better.

 

With many thanks in advance.

Edited by dx100uk
Link to post
Share on other sites

How was the account with your supplier arranged? Some make you sign a personal guarantee whereby you become liable otherwise the debt lies with your company. The HCEO may attend your home address if he believes there are goods there that belong to your company or if arranged as a personal guarantee can do so anyway. Regardless of what the paperwork says there is nothing that says you have to allow him access to your home, unless invited in he can NOT force entry. He may however force entry to any detached outbuildings. Are there any goods or assets at your business address, providing this is not attached to your residential premises he may force entry to find out.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the company became liable for the entire debt unfortunately, I dont know how they got hold of my home address. So the debt is to the company of which I'm the named director. The office I used to run from has now closed and there are no assets there either, its an empty shell. There are certainly no goods at my home address that used to belong to the company, I suppose my laptop could be deemed as being so but thats honestly it.

Edited by alexkbj
Extra info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Its addressed to the limited company but at my personal address, not the registered company address. There is no mention on any documents of my personal name and surname.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt is in the company name and you are not a guarantor the sherriffs men can not enter your property. They have no right of entry to any residential dwellings only business premises and if they say they have then they are lying.

 

It could be that the creditor is trying to claim off an insurance policy and so has had to take the matter to the high court, cant see any other reason for chasing a company that is not trading and as no assets.

 

Lastly, dont worry about this, you should inform the sherrif that there are no goods belonging to the debtor, ie the company at your address. If they still attend then simple do not open the door to them, if you do they can enter and seize goods, it is then on you to prove they dont belong to the debtor, avoid this distraint by not letting them in, remember they can NOT force entry into a private dwelling residence.

 

hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this bigal007 - I'll speak with them tomorrow and state that the debt is in the LTD company name and there are no assets belonging to the company at my residential address. Should I strike off my company ASAP? It hasn't traded for a long while and was kept open only to retain the name. Its registered address is NOT my personal home residence.

 

Could a winding up petition be ordered? Not that I understand what that is but it was mentioned by the creditors solicitors back last year. Is it worth me making an offer of repayment to the sherriff? It would then be considered by the creditor. I could explain that the company is defunct, has no assets and that, I, as its director have no assets either. Finally, would bankruptcy be a sensible option for me or perhaps an IVA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the Writ is made to your company and as company director you made no personnal guarantee to the debt, there are no assets etc then the Judgment Creditor can apply to make you bankrupt. Given your circumstances, then that to me sounds good as it saves you the costs to declaring yourself bankrupt.

 

The title of your thread say's 'walking posession arrived today' can I ask if the walking possession came by mail or did the paperwork come delivered by hand? Also who is the acting HCEO company? ...it is always good to know a little about the people your up against.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why should you make an offer to pay the creditor if it isnt your debt, its the companies debt and the company is a separate legal entity which means you are not personally liable as long as you are not a guarantor personally, being a director does not make you automatically liable for a LTD companies debts, the opposite is true.

 

If you are in any doubt ring your lawyer in the morning and he will confirm this over the phone im sure :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

So does this mean he can force his way into a set of garages, for example? We are a small block of flats here and the garages are in a separate building at the rear with individual unmarked garage doors. If a bailiff comes to any of our addresses at the flats, upon being refused entry could they then force entry into the individual garages?

Link to post
Share on other sites

To put it simple they cant take anything that doesnt belong to the limited company, period, matters not where it is although I wouldnt recommend storing your personal possesions at a business premises as after they have seized them it may be down to you to prove that they do not belong to the company :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

These would need to be proper bailiffs though, or could they just be ordinary DCAs empowered by the writ? Our garages out the back aren't numbered anyway so they'd need to know which was which I'd imagine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they certainly can not force their way into your home or out buildings, they can seize cars that are on your drive or parked on the road, but essentially bailiffs of whatever kind certainly can not force entry into a private dwelling residence. Open doors and windows are an invitation to them so beware.

Of yopu or anyone else is worried by this then I to put your mind at rest speak to a lawyer, most will tell you this over the phone free of charge, the CAB will give you the same advice.

If these people turn up the best way to deal with them is not to open the door or engage them in any dialogue, they will soon get bored and go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they certainly can not force their way into your home or out buildings, they can seize cars that are on your drive or parked on the road, but essentially bailiffs of whatever kind certainly can not force entry into a private dwelling residence. Open doors and windows are an invitation to them so beware.

Of yopu or anyone else is worried by this then I to put your mind at rest speak to a lawyer, most will tell you this over the phone free of charge, the CAB will give you the same advice.

If these people turn up the best way to deal with them is not to open the door or engage them in any dialogue, they will soon get bored and go away.

 

I would suggest than rather than give incorrect advice you research the matter carefully....you will sadly find they can break in to outbuidings and garages as long as they are detached from the main dwelling, remember you are dealing with High Court Enforcement using a writ of Fi Fa' not a snotty little debt collector or a know it all Baiiff. the poster would be wise to question your knowledge to High Court Enforcement before they find themselves even deeper in the mire!!!

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...