Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’.  Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time.  You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID.  You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.<<**IMPORTANT**  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?486334-CPR-31.14-Request-to-use-on-receipt-of-a-PPC-(-Private-Land-Parking-Court-Claim type your name ONLY no need to sign anything .you DO NOT await the return of paperwork. you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.
    • well post it here as a text in a the msg reply half of it is blanked out. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Company Van - Company wants me and several others to pay towards fuel costs !


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4372 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there - I trust someone might offer advice regarding the following.

 

Yesterday 5th May 2012, I and several others received the following through the post:-

 

 

Dear Mr Madcat333

 

As you are aware, at the end of March 2012, we discussed proposed changes, specifically being the removal of fuel cards.

 

I am pleased that we were able to conduct these discussions constructively and the purpose of this letter is to clarify the changes that have now been agreed and made.

 

The changes are as follows: to remove fuel cards from use. Fuel will be paid for journeys that necessitate business mileage of 50 miles and over each way from your home address.

 

These changes will be effectively immediately and all T***l fuel cards are to be returned to Head Office immediately. All Quick Fit cards are to be kept in case of breakdown or emergency fuel only.

 

If you have any questions whatsoever please do not hesitate to contact me.

 

Your cooperation is anticipated and appreciated.

 

Sincerely

 

 

Mr XXXX XXXXX

Operations Director.

 

 

This letter was sent to up to ten persons and was written exactly as it appears here (warts and all).

 

The letter was written on the 1st May, 2012; posted on the 4th May 2012 and received on the 5th May, 2012.

 

I have been a paid employee of the Company for the last three years and have always had the benefit of a fully expensed Van.

 

The discussion that took place at the end of March 2012 was an informal meeting in a roadside Cafe.

 

At the discussion it was highlighted that I was costing the Company £0.13 more per hour to send to work than the Company was receiving from its Client.

 

I ascertained that the Company had based its calculations on the fuel used during January 2012 and had not taken into account any other Months to provide an average.

 

I feel this was unfair since we work out of our Vans and in the absence of any welfare facilities needed to burn some fuel in order to keep warm in sub-zero temperatures !

 

I sympathetically listened to his pleadings but on no account agreed to pay anything towards his fuel costs.

 

Indeed I rang him later that day and proposed that I would return to a self employed status and they could make use of my services if I was not engaged in other business activities with other clients.

 

I never got the opportunity to present any details to him, instead I received the letter as above.

 

To pay for one hundred miles a shift is going to cost me an extra £300.00 per month and his returns will be modest.

 

My offer of permitting him to book my services as a self employed sub contractor (were I available) would have more than doubled his returns.

 

I obviously want to negotiate a revised package/ working relationship.

 

Is it too late ?

 

Thanks, in advance for any advice offered.

 

Regards

 

Madcat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally, your employer will reimburse you for the fuel used for business journeys.

See booklet 480 Expenses and Benefits on HMRC webbsite; it seems rather unfair if your employer is expecting you to part fund business miles.

There is one way round this without getting embroiled in confrontation with your employer;

Fill in form P87 at the end of the tax year (downloadable from HMRC website) and claim back the non reimbursed business mileage.

Be careful if you decide on self employed status because HMRC may deem you to be an employee if you only undertake work for one client during the tax year

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely claiming back tax on mileage only applies if you the employee provides the vehicle?

Is that what you do, Is it your vehicle? you pay the licence and insurance etc.

If so, then yes you can claim the tax back, based on 35p or 40p/mile. ( not sure what the current rate is at the mo.)

You can do that anyway if the employer only pays the fuel you just take the fuel you get away from the allowance and claim the rest back.

IRC allow you say 35p/mile you deduct fuel paid by employer at say 15p/mile, so you can claim back 20p/mile. ( example )

Done that for years and it did appear as a general allowance on tax form. ( retired now ).

Link to post
Share on other sites

EIM22900 - Van fuel benefit from 2005/06: introduction

Section 160 ITEPA 2003

From 2005/06 onwards, van fuel benefit is incurred whenever:

any fuel is provided (see EIM25515), whether or not for private use

for a van for which the restricted private use condition (EIM22795) is not met.

The charge is in addition to the relevant van benefit charge and operates in a very similar way to the car fuel benefit charge; see EIM22905 for similarities and EIM22910 for the few differences.

Note that van fuel benefit is not incurred if either of the above conditions is not met, that is if either:

the restricted private use condition is met for that employee in relation to that van, or

no fuel at all is provided for any purpose.

Nor is van fuel benefit incurred:

for years to 2009/10 if the van is powered solely by electricity

for years from 2010/11 onwards if the van cannot in any circumstances emit CO2 by being driven (a zero emission van).

Cash equivalent

See EIM22915 (but note that the cash equivalent is reduced to nil if the employee pays for all their private fuel, EIM22920).

Reduction in van benefit to nil - effect on van fuel benefit charge

Note that it is possible for the van fuel benefit charge to be incurred even if there is no taxable amount of van benefit. For example, where the restricted private use condition is not met in relation to a van, the cash equivalent of that van benefit might be reduced to nil as a result of payments made by the director or employee for the private use of the van (see EIM22840).

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for a prompt response Gbarbm.

 

Have just downloaded the Booklet and Form.

 

There are just so many areas that I and others feel needed to be discussed before this kind of letter was posted to us.

 

Not one of us had been provided with complete information with which to make such an important decision.

 

Indeed several fellow employees only knew about the Company's intentions when they opened the letter yesterday.

 

All we know at this stage is that the Company thinks it has our consent to somehow deduct nearly £300 per month from our wages!

 

They are using a Tracking device in order to compute the deductions !

 

These were fitted a fortnight or so ago.

 

Once again many thanks for your help.

 

Regards

 

Madcat

Link to post
Share on other sites

To elaborate, we were provided with Vans expressly for Business use.

 

No personal mileages were permitted.

 

All details of use were logged without any shenanigans or creative activities.

 

We had use of a multi function card for all Fuel, Maintenance and Breakdown use.

 

Now we are expected to foot the bill for the first 50 miles of an outward journey and the first 50 miles of the return trip.

 

The Company will then pick up the bill for any miles effectively over the 50 mile point each way.

 

I feel particularly aggrieved since I only travel within a 40 mile radius of my home location.

 

Hence I go from fully expensed Van to Van where I pay all fuelling costs !

 

Many thanks also to Raydetinu, although ive just spent 2 mins believing i had trapped a gnat behind my screen protector ! Damn!

 

Regards

 

Madcat

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that the employer should have discussed this with you beforehand.

Do you have a union rep you could take this up with?

Now this is just my opinion you understand; but I wonder if your employer has recently been the subject of an employer compliance review by HMRC and have been pulled up on their record keeping and have had to pay money to HMRC as a result hence their over zealous attitude to the vans.

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks again Gbarbm.

 

I have just joined the GMB today on account of them having a specialist section that deals specifically with my Industry Sector.

 

It is my intention to take matters as far as praticable to reach an amicable workable solution; afterall we all need to work.

 

It just grates that they have put the cart before the horse for some reason; almost as if they are rushing to be seen as compliant or accountable to someone.

 

All I want is the opportunity to be listened to and for us all to be treated respectfully.

 

It was troubling me that they state they have incepted this method when there are several other avenues that remain unexplored.

 

Regards

 

Madcat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good idea to get the unions take on it. Let us know how you get on with that and post back here if you need any further help.

Good luck and kind regards

Gbarbm

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Leave van(s) at work. Drive to work in private car and home in private car. I am sure you haven't probs with commuting to and from ???

 

Therefore all mileage in vans will be business. Ok you'll have to pay the fuel to commute. Hopefully you are closer than 50 miles!.

 

If they don't put fuel in vans then you cant work!!!

 

Oh, custom and practise......

 

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks to you all for pointers given thus far.

 

My line of approach is to:

 

1. Express in writing that I have not given consent.

2. To keep everything in writing between myself and my Employer.

3. Demand a reasonable time-frame to seek advice from various sources : Union, ACAS, CAG, CAB and if necessary an Employment Law Firm.

4. Express that they continue their custom and practice of meeting fuel costs via fuel card throughout this period of consultation and negotiation.

 

I will most definitely continue to post back, since this thread might well become more relevant in the future in respect of Company Vehicle Drivers whose Companies are looking to cut costs.

 

Once again thank-you.

 

Regards

 

Madcat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add, ACAS have a conciliation service, so it's possible for employees to collectively go to ACAS, who will then talk to the employer on your behalf. They will also then mediate, for free, if a meeting is arranged to try to solve the dispute between the employer and the group of employees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its been a busy couple of Days.

 

Contacted ACAS and they gave some good advice over the phone.

 

They commented that the variance referred to in the letter could not be back-dated and used a very strong term - "unlawful" !

Also they said it would have been more reasonable for the Employer to have confirmed the contents of the discussion that took place in March 2012 in writing.

It would then have been reasonable for the Employer to have entered into a consultation and discussion period at a minimum of "one week per year's service upto a maximum of twelve weeks".

 

ACAS said that should the Employer wish to proceed without our consent it would be reasonable for the Employer to state their actions in writing giving the same notice period that would be applicable to termination of Contract i.e. twenty-eight days.

 

Finally they said it was a matter that could be taken further at my discretion.

 

After that phone call I got through to my Union representative.

 

Upon hearing of my predicament she advised me to make a formal grievance in writing and post it to my Employer via recorded delivery.

She is more than willing to accompany me to the meeting in order that I can air my views and get some transparent answers to the many questions this issue raises.

 

So I'm off to draw up a letter as advised.

 

This matter has had a detrimental effect to the degree that 1 Employee has walked out, 1 Employee is signed off with stress and 6 of us have become Members of the same Union !

 

Surely it would have been easier for the Employer to have suggested a small deduction in rate of pay/hr?

 

Many thanks to all who posted since my last visit - it's all very much appreciated.

 

Regards

 

Madcat

Link to post
Share on other sites

To elaborate, we were provided with Vans expressly for Business use.

 

No personal mileages were permitted.

 

All details of use were logged without any shenanigans or creative activities.

 

We had use of a multi function card for all Fuel, Maintenance and Breakdown use.

 

Now we are expected to foot the bill for the first 50 miles of an outward journey and the first 50 miles of the return trip.

 

That's absurd. Like BA demanding that their pilots pay for the jet fuel for flights within the UK...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...