Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Referring back to to your initial post... So not a judgment ?
    • I have never heard of any such law. Please post a link to what you have read online that explains this law. And please confirm whether you were ever married to or in a formal Civil Partnership with your Ex.
    • Today has been hectic so  have been unable to complete the whole thing. If you now understand it and want to go ahead with a complaint to the IPC, fine. If not then I won't need to finish it. But below is my response to your request  on post 64. No you don't seem stupid, the Protection of Freedoms Act isn't easy to get one 's head around at first. The part of the above Act referring to private parking is contained within Schedule 4 which you can find online under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Section 9 of SCH.4 relates to how the parking scrotes have to perform so that they can transfer their right to pursue the keeper from the driver when the PCN is still unpaid after a certain amount of time. In your case the PCN was posted to you the keeper and arrived within 14 days from when they claimed a breach occurred. That means they complied with first part of the Act. The driver at that time was still responsible to pay the charge demanded on the PCN and PCM now have to wait for 28 days to elapse before they can write and advise the keeper that as the charge has not been paid, that they now have the right to pursue the keeper. They claim they sent the first PCN on the 13th March, five days after the alleged breach and it arrived on Friday 15th March. So to comply with the Act they have to observe Section 8 subsection 2f   (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So the first PCN was deemed to arrive on the 15th March and for 28 days to have elapsed is when the time is right for them to write and say you are now liable as keeper. So they sent the next PCN on the 12th April which is too early as you could still have paid until midnight of the 12th. So the earliest their second PCN should have gone to you was  Saturday 13th April so more likely on Monday 15th April. The IPC Code of Conduct states "Operators must be aware of their legal obligations and implement the relevant legislation and guidance when operating their businesses." So by issuing your demand a day early, they have broken the Act, the IPC Code of Conduct, the DVLA agreement  to abide by the law and the Code of Conduct not to mention a possible breach of your GDPR .   I asked the IPC  in the letter on an earlier to confirm that  CPMs Notice misrepresenting the law was a standard practice for all of PCMs Notices or just certain ones. Their distribution  may depend on when they were issued and whether they were issued in certain localities or for certain breaches. Whichever method used is a serious breach of the Law and could lead to PCM being black listed by the DVLA . One would expect that after that even if the IPC did not cancel your ticket, PCM could not risk going to Court with you nor even pursuing you any further.
    • thanks jk2054 - do you know any law i can quote (regarding timeframe) when sending the email as if i cant they'll probably just say no like the normal staff have done? thanks.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Employer/mental health issues


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4423 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

My husband became stressed with work last year as he felt bullied by one of the managers. He ended up being signed off work with stress in December and at the time told work he wanted to raise a grievance at the time and made this known to HR. However, he then ended up with severe mental health problems and was in hospital for 2 months. One of the contributing factors was stress from work.

He has now been home for just over a month and has been signed off from work til the middle of May. He received a letter from work the other day asking him to go in for a meeting about his absence. I responded on his behalf and said that he didn't feel he was able to go in for a meeting at this stage and as he's been signed off til May, could we review the situation nearer that time when he may be well enough.

Today we've received a letter stating they want authority to access his medical records given the amount of time he has been off. Our initial reaction was 'no' due to the sensitive nature of his illness and the events that led up to him being detained in a secure psychiatric unit. However, I've since had a look on the internet and from what I can see, if he doesn't give them access, they are allowed decided whether he should continue being employed by them regardless of the fact he has a sicknote.

Can anyone advise? From our point of view we don't really want to deal with his work issues at the moment as he is still getting over his illness which was severe and we don't want them to know the details of everything that happened. Why isn't a doctors note enough and what are his rights?

He has been employed with them for over 12 months and maybe had one or two sick days in the whole time he has been employed which I think is about 3 years so he hasn't got an issue with sickness etc prior to December last year.

Any advice is welcome!

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does he want to go back to this job as it has obviously had a major affect on his health? that decision may help you decide how you want to procede with this, whatever you do be careful as your husband wont need any more stress at the moment.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

To be honest I don't think he wants to go back which is understandable but we are thinking he deserves the sick pay he will get for the time being after all he's been through..we want to get something out of it all and just don't feel like they should be calling the shots and deciding what's what after the stress they have caused him and the least they could do is pay sick pay until his sick period is up! Not that I'm bitter about it or anything :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would usually say in these circumstances that it's best to cooperate. If you don't agree to helping the employer determine the nature of his illness, they may well be more likely to be able to fairly dismiss him on capability grounds as your husband refused to provide evidence to assist their investigation. That's the worst case scenario.

 

The issue is not the sick note, but his likely return to work. They may take a view without medical evidence that he won't be coming back, and dismiss him. With evidence in place that he may shortly be fit to return to work, that could help his case. If he won't be fit to return in the next few months, I guess you'd have to take a view on it. Ultimately he doesn't have to agree, but it may be best to send redacted medical records, relating only to his current condition.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you tell us what the state of his grievance is? Also the bullying aspect, was there an element of discrimination at all ie was he ill before he went off sick or is his illness caused by the incidents?

 

You are clearly in Discrimination territory and his illness clearly would be covered under the Equality Act 2010. Even if there was no discrimination prior to him going off then HR and the company clearly have to be careful that their actions do not become discriminatory. The handling of the grievance and the handling of him during his illness have to be fair. Accessing his medical notes could be helpful on the other hand they could throw up matters that you and he would rather his work does not know. Signing a carte blanche access authority in my opinion when dealing with mental health issues is very fraught and should be avoided.

 

Seeing that you state "Our initial reaction was 'no' due to the sensitive nature of his illness and the events that led up to him being detained in a secure psychiatric unit." you need to come up with a solution. I suggest you play the 'reasonable adjustment' card. Write to HR stating that due to the nature of his illness you believe the EA 2010 aplies and that you ask for a RA in that they specifically ask questions they are seeking to assist in their process and that you will ask a doctor to answer them. Do not give unrestricted access to the notes. State that reports from the notes can be accomodated. Then when you get the questions copy it and forward it to the Consultant Psychiatrist (or you could do the privately too if you have the resources) with a coverung letter. Tell the doctor in that letter you want to see ALL communications and reports before they are disclosed. If there is anything in that report / letter then ask for it to be removed and / or suggest a form of words that is acceptable to you both. People generally just write and allow access... but it is fishing expedition for the other side and it can go horrible wrong if YOU don't control the flow of information.

 

If the company / HR decline to cooperate then they probably will have discriminated against him.

 

Check if you have Legal Protection Insurance to cover employment disputes (normally attached to home contents insurance policies) because you may need it in due course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your responses everybody, very helpful!

 

In relation to your questions papasmurf, he had just said that he wished to raise a grievance shortly before he went off sick or it might have been initially when he went off sick and he sent an email saying he would like to raise a grievance, I would have to check. The HR lady then emailed him and said she would like to have a meeting to discuss the grievance, as he was then severely ill I responded and said he was in hospital and we would deal with the grievance at a later stage so it was just left at that. We since haven't had the energy or been in the right frame of mind to do anything more about it as we have been focusing on getting him out of hospital and getting better.

 

Prior to him going off sick in December, he had probably a couple of months where he felt like he was being bullied..things like he was told he was up for a job on the day shift (he worked nights) and then his manager virtually laughed in his face and told him he would never get it when he went for it. I think there were a couple of incidences of his manager swearing at him and shouting in his face and such like. He was made to feel like a fool. This wasn't the sole cause of his illness but I think it pushed him over the edge in terms of everything that subsequently happened. Now I'm thinking about it, I'm getting angry about it and thinking we should proceed with the grievance, it's just whether my husband is up to it really.

 

Your suggestion of reasonable adjustment is a very good one, that makes sense to me. There's no need for them to know all the details and they are not mental health experts so I can't see what use his medical records would do but if they have specific questions, I'm happy to get them answered.

 

Will check about the legal cover too. Thanks for the helpful information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK that is helpful, but as these things go one response generates others.

 

The one thing I would say about grievances, especially those alleging management bullying and behaviour that is unbecoming as you describe, is that they can become nasty. Expect lies and more lies to cover their backs and even if proved no action will be taken against errant mangement. Nothing will be upheld in his favour and even if it is they won't discipline his managers. So you have to mentally prepare yourself and that is doubly difficult when also dealing with mental illness. These conditions can last many years and even a lifetime so ask yourselves, are you up to the task? Once you start his health (and yours) may get worse. Ask yourself are you a fighter or are you more pragmatic and see that early extraction would be better for his and your health? There is no shame in either you do what you think is best for yourselves.

 

is the company a public authority, large corporation or a smallish company? They will have Policies for Equality, Sickness, Grievances, Appeals etc and you need to see them and get copies. The time limits in those policies should be adhered to but they can be extended according to circumstane eg as you requested on the grieveance to deal with it when he is well enough.

 

You seem rather vague as to the incidents... you need to sit down and make a list of things that you want to raise in the grievance and try and get evidence about it eg witnesses (although don't expect any as people tend to want to protect their own jobs so beware what they say to you.) If witnesses are available get written and signed statements from them. Secure any written evidence eg emails applications and the like. Once you have done that try and formulate what the grievance is about you will need that later.

 

Union membership? What has happened there if relevant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with Becky and Papa in that a grievence can turn nasty and that its always better to cooperate, or be seen to be cooperating at least initially. is he being paid sick pay at the moment? if so how long will it be paid for? Be reasonable for now, it will be less stressful for both you and your husband and the important thing is not to hinder his recovery by getting into stressful argumentative situations. Just be a bit careful, dont jump at anything and dont say too much yet, see how it looks to be panning out, sometimes an employer may be more reasonable or fair than you think they might be.

Hope it all works out ok

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest a yes to the medical records, or make them send a questionairre to his GP and consultant.

 

When you raise your grievance i would suggest you ask for the stress management policy and risk assessments (the latter being a legal requirement) if they cannot supply these then you onto a good start.

 

The reply to your grievance will be insulting, and upsetting, unless you have a really good employer. Try not to take it personally and just think they are trying to cover themselves legally. Appeal the grievance and then get another insulting reply!

 

Its not very dignifying, and not very fun at all, but it is a step to making them take you seriously. And you never know they might say something that you'll be able to get hold of and get them for!

 

Good Luck!

I am not a legal professional or adviser, I am however a Law Student and very well versed areas of Employment Law. Anything I write here is purely from my own experiences! If I help, then click the star to add to my reputation :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have suffered work stress to the point where I have needed time off. Please look to your GP for assistance in this - they can be an absolute godsend in these circumstances. Certainly my doctor did not take kindly to my employer's behaviour - and she was very supportive to me without being antagonistic towards my employer.

 

She was very good at asking me 'what do you want to do?' and advising me what could be done. GPs have to deal with the mental (and physical) health fallout from the bad behaviour of employers these days. Please seek out this support.

 

All the best to you both - do remember that once this is over calmer times will come back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...