Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update! I emailed both Andrzej.Tuleja and James_Goldsmith at Whirlpool dot com. I got a phone call from their executive team a couple of days later, and a replacement part dropped on the mat a week after. She was quite apologetic, however, also reiterated the "90 day warranty" period on customer fitted parts, and did not comment when I mentioned that the CRA also applies as I was a consumer buying from them directly. So I now have a spare door switch if the machine decides to eat another in the future! Cheers all!   Note dx100 that the "Hotpoint CEO" you linked to is not related to the hotpoint appliances, but some kind of marketing app.
    • yep, throw that morality card out the window....9/10 you never owe a DCA ANYTHING!! they are NOT BAILIFFS!!
    • (See the link to DVLA’s INF188/6 document I posted above, page 4 as cited) “I have a new medical condition that I have told the DVLA about on my recent application. Can I drive? As soon as the DVLA receives your correct and complete application for a new licence and as long as you meet all the Section 88 criteria, you may drive. It is important that you are satisfied that the medical condition you have declared on your application does not stop you from driving. If you are unsure, check with your doctor or healthcare professional before you make a decision. You can also look up your condition in the ‘Assessing fitness to drive’ guide, which you can find at www.gov.uk/dvla/fitnesstodrive to see whether you meet the medical standards for driving. As this guide is intended for healthcare professionals, it can be complicated. Your doctor or healthcare professional should be able to help you if necessary." It seems that DVLA think that S.88 does apply for applications disclosing a new medical condition after all. Why might this be so, and what of “qualifying application" and "relevant disability"? S. 92(1) imposes on the driver a requirement to disclose a relevant disability. S.92(3) requires the Secretary of State to refuse such an application disclosing a relevant disability ….. EXCEPT S.92(4) requires the Secretary of State to grant such an application if the relevant disability is “adequately controlled”. Hence my belief S.88 can apply for medical conditions (if the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive) as the application remains a qualifying application IF the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive, until DVLA (on behalf of the Secretary of State) say it doesn’t, provided the driver believes they meet the (medical) standard. Additionally, at (or before) June 2013 (as noted in my previous post) the medical standard for fitness to drive for conditions involving excessive daytime sleepiness was changed from “completely controlled” to "adequately controlled".  
    • CFO Bill Guan allegedly led a team at the news outlet that was behind a global money laundering scheme.View the full article
    • Anyway, I've asked my Booking.com flat-rent-out-bloke what needs to be done on the Booking.com portal to cancel a reservation. I got a late message "I'll let you know tomorrow".
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lodger gives 4 days notice and wants rent back


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4477 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

almost a year ago, we decided to rent out a room as money was tight, double room £85 week furnished, and included tea and coffee.

 

 

Fred (not real name) come and viewed, liked the room, he said he would be here monday to friday, so 4 nights, so i said to him as he was only here 4 nigghts i would do him an evening meal for those 4 evenings.

 

Fred moved in, after abou t3 months he was starting to stay over the weekend and having a meal on sunday (roast dinner, my fault as asked if he would like one the first weekend, after that it seemed to be expected!) now he hardly goes home.

 

Sunday he tells us that he is moving out this thursday (1/3/12) and wants 3 weeks rent back, as he paid it in last week (bank transfer).

 

can he do this?

what are my legal rights?

 

What i feel i should do is not return his rent as notice wasnt reasnable, and as he paid monthly it should have been a months notice, and all the ''extras'' he's had (he was also eating cakes and using our marmalade, jam etc also taking our teabags to work). if he wants to stay the rest of the month thats up to him.

opinions please

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you are right. Especially if the rent was on a monthly basis. I think that this creates a reasonable expectation that the contract could be terminated by either side on a month's notice.

 

Start keeping notes and confirm every communication in writing

Link to post
Share on other sites

My comments only apply if the premises are entirely within England.

 

Only a Court can decide what the legal effect of your contract agreement is. All we can do is suggest some matters that might be relevent to the court's decision.

 

 

Contracts which cannot be Assured or Shorthold tenancies

 

The following, if granted today, cannot be assured or shorthold tenancies:

 

• a letting by a resident landlord; or

• a licence.

 

 

Verbal agreements

 

For a verbal contract to be validly created, and therefore legally binding, there must be -

 

(a) an offer to let the room, made by the landlord;

(b) acceptance of that offer by the occupier;

© an agreement to make payment, usually of money (e.g. a rent);

(d) an intention to create legal relations - which is presumed to exist unless the parties are related by blood or marriage.

 

You have met all those requirements, from what you say.

 

You therefore appear to have a valid contract; but it is a licence, not a tenancy. A contract is quite valid if verbal. But you can't create a tenancy of a single room, if essential facilities - such as a bathroom and/or kitchen - are shared. A tenancy requires exclusive use of seperate accommodation.

 

What you appear to have is a lodger, not a tenant. In law, he is called a Licencee. The laws that govern tenancies don't apply to lodgers, so there are no terms implied into your contract by law. You only have the express contract terms, i.e. those which you and the lodger actually agreed.

 

If you don't have a written contract with him, it is going to be difficult to prove that he had agreed to give you any notice in advance to end the letting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for replys guys, well he has now gone actually left this morning knowing we were all out, with him he has taken the front door key and 1 set of double bed linen, so now have to change the locks!

He hasnt spoke to me all week, he ate his meals i left for him, no thanks or any thing then he steals from us.

Makes me mad, try and help someone by keeping their costs down ( i e feeding him as well ) and he does this.

next lodger written contract and rules!

needles to say deffinatley keeping rent now!

 

edited to add;

has also taken knife and fork from best set and it was a new set!! ggrrr

Edited by Kaluki
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...