Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that nuanced response Bazza. I was hoping to argue that I did turn left into the road and what happens on the road I turned into is a moot point. Best, Chris
    • Hi mitm are you able to DM me? Need some advice and rather just take off here for now. Won’t let me DM you as a new user. 
    • Just a little something for consideration When a card is compromised, the replacements can be set up to automatically allow or manually re-add, old recurring transactions. The card issuer may ask you to confirm legitimate transactions which they would effectively 'migrate' to the new card Some do - some don't. Some staff on some cards seem to be entirely unaware/uncaring about this. Some card issuers expect you to sort it all out manually.   BUT if the leak is an ongoing lyca leakas it seems - as soon as you or your CC supplier give it to lyca/the leak source - compromised again     A note on security DONT use the same email or phone number for your banking as you do for sims etc. Although a bank eg santander leak would compromise this Infp seems to suggest that single/compromised multi factor authentication customers are priority targets, with more robustly secure cards being hit by 0.00 tests first Consider that the email address is one of the OTP recieving options AND one of the OTP security checks prior to sending the OTP - with the phone number being another So if they've got your card and email (same email for banking and end contact) - and you aren't forcing a phone OTP - you are compromised.  
    • Thanks for posting up the back of the NTK. The good news s that as it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act, it means that you are not liable for the charge as the keeper as I explained in a previous post.  The PC fails for two reasons. The first is that it does not specify the period of parking. All it does is list the arrival and departure times of your car. Obviously that does not include the time taken to drive to the car parking space, manoeuvre the car into the space and later drive from the space to the exit. Nor does their times include things like getting kids disabled people out of and into the car as well as things like returning the trolley whilst still being parked. All of which can add a fair bit of time to the parking period which can then be subtracted from their ANPR times and makes your actual parking time a lot shorter than 118 minutes they seem to think it is. The second reason is that they failed to ask the keeper to pay Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][e]  (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges You as keeper are now in the clear which is a good reason for you to contact Sainsbury  stating that you are being pursued as the keeper when you are not liable under the Act as well as the oher things I suggested in my previous post. If you don't get it cancelled with Sainsbury this could drag on for months with endless letters unlawfully pushing the price up to scare you into paying.  
    • Brilliant! That's great to hear and honestly pleased I'm wrong, my advice was out of concern. I checked some of your previous posts last night and you've been giving great advice to others at times. Bringing a claim can be serious (counter-claims etc) and it didn't appear you were knowledgeable based on posts so far. Far from an expert myself, just interested and will try to help. I'll sit on the sidelines, best of luck with the claim!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ready for war with BANKSTERS


commando
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6531 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks a million Tinkerbelle,

When I send LBA I will put £977 ( which is on prelim ) plus £70 charge in May.

Nothing bounced in April so I thought I had a final figure, the last charge occured in mid March and taken the other day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hiya

Same time frame for me to , helping o/h with claiming back £5378" FEES HA", claiming £4980, roughly 5 yrs worth so as to be ableto go through SCC,also same with as you with "FEES HA" incured after LBA keep rising.Read somewhere??? to carry on with claim,an when it all sorted a phone call or letter demanding your "ILLEAGL FEES"be returned to your account pronto !! should surfice as the bank now know you are informed,and deadly serious about court acction should they not comply ,:lol::lol: and about time to me dear.have to wait an see eh?

keep the good work up.this is so sweeeeeeet loving every single step

not been this fired up for ages its great

:grin:

Dont get mad :-x get even :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope it goes well mate. Just getting ready to send off my request for repayment of charges letter.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=4190 - Rjh v Lloyds Tsb.

Dpa Sent (13/04/06).

Statements Recevied (04/05/06).

Preliminary Letter Sent £775 owed! (12/05/06).

Received Standard Reply from Lloyds. (17/05/06).

Posted LBA (31/05/06).

Received Lloyds "Final Response" Letter (03/06/06).

Filed Claim with Moneyclaim for £775+£192.19 interest. (21/07/06)

Lloyds defend claim (23/08/06)

**Lloyds pay up, at last. £1078 (14/11/06)**

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Commando - did you get a copy of the letter I mentioned in my thread? Just seeing whether they've adopted a new standardised approach?

reload vs Lloyds - £2703.11 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload vs Lloyds Round 2 - Prelim sent 27/03/07. £435 owed.

reload vs Capital One - £456.57 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload's mum vs Barclays - £745 owed. £375 partial settlement reached 17/10/06.

Lloyds Bank - The Template Response Letters!

 

Advice & opinions of reload are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. Please use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gang,

Yes reload got exactly same reply as you. I have decided to wait the full 14 days for two reasons

1) It suits me because I wont have to file money claim untill after the end of the month and I will have more money then.

2) I have read all the FAQs and threads on this and I believe that it looks better on you in court. Many times I've read "be as good as your word, no more no less".

 

I'm sticking to my word and giving them 14 days, so LBA will be in the post by R/D 18/5/06.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gang,

Sending in LBA today. Not nervous worried or bothered about what lies ahead. Been wiseing myself up on the court proceedure. The more you do the more confident you will be.

Good luck to you all, will keep you posted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm just at the LBA stage. Sending the letter off soon. Good luck with your claim.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=4190 - Rjh v Lloyds Tsb.

Dpa Sent (13/04/06).

Statements Recevied (04/05/06).

Preliminary Letter Sent £775 owed! (12/05/06).

Received Standard Reply from Lloyds. (17/05/06).

Posted LBA (31/05/06).

Received Lloyds "Final Response" Letter (03/06/06).

Filed Claim with Moneyclaim for £775+£192.19 interest. (21/07/06)

Lloyds defend claim (23/08/06)

**Lloyds pay up, at last. £1078 (14/11/06)**

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Manage to get your Moneyclaim filed Commando?

reload vs Lloyds - £2703.11 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload vs Lloyds Round 2 - Prelim sent 27/03/07. £435 owed.

reload vs Capital One - £456.57 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload's mum vs Barclays - £745 owed. £375 partial settlement reached 17/10/06.

Lloyds Bank - The Template Response Letters!

 

Advice & opinions of reload are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. Please use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I'm back,

Sorry I went AWOL my computer packed up completely and its taken untill now to get it fixed. Bet you all thought I got my money back and buggered off without donating.

QUESTION - I could of filed money claim on 2/6/06 can I just go ahead and do it today or will the 20 day delay alter things. In LBA I did not state when I would go to court so I think I am allowed to file money claim today.PLEASE ADVISE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I cannot see that it will make any difference.

If anything, surely you have given them extra time to comply with your request

for a refund. If I were in your position I would go ahead and file the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lusky + nail = hit on head tbh ;)

 

Welcome back to the forum commando, have to admit I did wonder the other day what happened to you :p

reload vs Lloyds - £2703.11 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload vs Lloyds Round 2 - Prelim sent 27/03/07. £435 owed.

reload vs Capital One - £456.57 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload's mum vs Barclays - £745 owed. £375 partial settlement reached 17/10/06.

Lloyds Bank - The Template Response Letters!

 

Advice & opinions of reload are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. Please use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right just filed on money claim but may have made a mistake. £977.50 charges and £98.96 interest. Total box put £977.50 and paid £80 court charge, ticked box to say I was claiming the interest. Should I have put £1076.46 in the total box.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did my claim in person at the court and put the total claim + interest in the the total box. Maybe someone who is more au fait with the moneyclaim procedure could advise you. I know there is a fee for amending a claim so perhaps you can withdraw the claim and submit it again? Can someone who is a bit more clued up than me please advise Commando? Failing that Commando give Moneyclaim a call I'm sure they will advise you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Decided to give them a call tommorow otherwise I think I will loose the £98.96. Sure I read somewhere if your total charges are less than £1000 you pay £80 court fee then add on the 8% interest. Will update you in the morning, thanks for your help anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to act fast.

 

I made the same mistake at the weekend!! Moneyclaim advised me to withdraw my claim & submit a fresh one to avoid £35 amendment fee.

 

I sent them an email straight away which they replied to at 9.30am on monday morning & also telephoned them to make sure.

 

I recieved a cheque today from HM Paymaster General to refund my £120 fee for the first claim.

 

My thread is under kazzaw v Lloyds TSB

FIRST DIRECT: £4751.86 SETTLED IN FULL 5/07/06 :-)

 

TESCO VISA CARD: £90 SETTLED IN FULL 12/08/06 :)

 

LLOYDS TSB: £4403.59 SETTLED IN FULL 17/08/06 :)

EGG: £451.52 SETTLED IN FULL 18/01/07 :)

 

 

Opinions and advice of kazzaw are independent, offered informally, without prejudice, without liability, and not endorsed by the Bank Action Group. If in any doubt, seek the advice of a qualified, insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phoned the court this morning told them I made a mistake with the figures and they advised me to suspend the claim which I have done. They will give me a refund and I have to submit a new claim and pay again, then e-mail them with the old and new case numbers. Going to file new claim in the next few hours and inform B/F of my **** up. Annoying thing is I did it right first time and then changed it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah well, you live and learn. At least you'll know for the next one now :)

reload vs Lloyds - £2703.11 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload vs Lloyds Round 2 - Prelim sent 27/03/07. £435 owed.

reload vs Capital One - £456.57 Settlement Reached 14/07/06.

reload's mum vs Barclays - £745 owed. £375 partial settlement reached 17/10/06.

Lloyds Bank - The Template Response Letters!

 

Advice & opinions of reload are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. Please use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Filed a new claim this morning for a total of £1196.46.

£977.50 charges, £98.96 interest and £120 court fee, did'nt include £10 DPAR as the cheque was never cashed.

Last month the bank informed me on the statement that they would be taking £70 from my account on 1/6. Something must be happening in high places because this was never taken.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Commando...just picked up yr thread and wanted to add my support to yr attack.

 

Like you l was self-employed and a long-standing LTSB customer (over 25 years) and like you they have inflicted serious damage on me and my family thru their thoughtless, greedy actions. They have made me very angry which, as l am pretty laid back normally, is not easy to do!

 

My company will be joining the campaign with an MOL claim sometime this week.

Keep your powder dry.........and don't take prisoners!

Link to post
Share on other sites

RETALIATION OR WHAT.

 

This is a personal joint account I'm claiming back charges on. Me and my wife paid off in full and cancelled LTSB C/C's on 3/06.

Had a credit check done today only to find LTSB C/C have informed the reference agency that both accounts are 3 months in arrears ?????????????

 

Went into local branch today and mentioned it to the useless-ess, I mean the manager-ess. She checked on computer and confirmed it was paid in full and closed. She phoned C/C dept who confirmed it was paid in full and closed. She asked for proof of the entry so I said "do a credit check yourself ". Had to leave the bank at that point but said I would return tommorow.

 

Now, I could understand if it was paid off last week or even last month due to internal updates or human error the info had not filtered through, but 4 months ago ???? thats very suspect to me. What do you think ?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Deemed served on 2/7

Acknowledged on 4/7 by Sechiara Clark and Mitchel solicitors, and guess what, they're going to defend in full.

I'm on the final countdown.

 

Hi commando,

I am at a similar point with my claim:

Deemed served on 24/6/06

Acknowledged on 3/7/06 by "Sechiari Clark and Mitchell (Tsb)".

They are going to defend in full.

 

My thread is:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/lloyds-bank/4887-beans-timeline-joint-acct.html

 

Good luck.

 

Re 'retaliation or what?', see what you find out tomorrow and go from there. You may wish to search mjanet's thread for 'FSA'.

Regards,

Bean

Lloyds TSB - 27/11/06 - £6377 paidrest with FOS

 

SETTLED

Cap One - 6/10/06 - £875

Lloyds TSB (MC) - 20/10/06 (BY DEF) £372

Hitachi Cap - Nov. 06 - £207

Citi Cards - 28/12//06 - £220

Monument - 23/1/07 - £889

Barclaycard (Mrs. Bean) - 19/2/07 £376

Opinions / advice of Bean are independent, informal, without prejudice, without liability, not CAG endorsed. If in doubt, ask a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6531 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...