Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Sorry  Noted x   Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dodgy accident claim help?


Richy B
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4462 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

 

I was wandering if anyone could help me in this sticky situation! On the 2nd of July last year I was driving home from Porthcawl with my other half after a night out when a young driver in front of me smashed in to stationary traffic! He was driving his Dad's Vauxhall Corsa on route to a rugby match so as you can imagine he was quite excited and paying very little attention.

 

Anyway, cut a long story short, we were on a dual carriageway so I swerved from the right lane to the left to avoid the pile up and a Toyota Avensis took of my wing mirror and put a small dink in my wing!

 

Now as much as I think the driver of the Vauxhall Corsa should have been to blame for the whole accident the insurance companies didn't see it that way and treated me colliding with the Toyota as a separate incident! This conclusion did make me very angry but eventually I came to terms with it!

 

All 4 of the occupants of the Toyota are now claiming for injury of some sort, because I stood talking to them for at least half an hour after the accident I know their were no injuries incurred! It is people like these that are to blame for such high insurance premiums!

 

I received a letter from the solicitors (Keoghs LLP) that are supposed to be defending the claim on my half this morning asking em to sign an authority to settle! Now I haven't heard from my insurers or the solicitors for at least 4 months so I called them to see how much the claimants are claiming for and for details of the individual claims but apparently they don't have this information yet? The woman told me if I sign the authority to settle that does not mean they'll pay out whatever amount the claimants are claiming for and they will still fight the claim for me.

 

Anyway I have refused to sign the authority whilst I seek further advice and until I have seen details of the claim.

 

I think the way my insurance company and the Solicitors have dealt with this matter is a joke,i'm not happy at all especially with their lack of communication. What are peoples views on this? Do any of you have any tips or advice that may help me? Has anyone been in a similar situation and if so what was the overall verdict?

 

Please help me out here :/

 

p.s sorry if it's all a bit messy it was rushed before work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you had to swerve to avoid the pileup and couldn't just brake in time, then surely you were following the driver in front of you too closely, so you are at least partially responsible for clipping the Toyota? I'm not saying it's right that they're claiming for injuries that they may not have (though remember, some injuries don't always show symptoms right away), but it does seem right that your insurance be paying out for their damages. They seem totally justified in treating it as a totally separate incident IMHO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am with MaxxPower on this. You are in the right hand lane and you swerve into the left hand lane and You hit the Toyota? Did I misread your original post?

 

If so, fake injuries aside, how can the Toyota driver be held liable when you probably left him with nowhere to go as it was you who changed lanes suddenly, and it certainly sounds as if you were driving too close to the vehicle in front, and as an accident investigator, I would certainly regard this as a major contributory factor.

 

If I have misread your post, then please feel to correct me.

 

The issue of the injuries is a different matter.

 

A genuine whiplash can take several hours to kick in (assuming it is a whiplash injury they are claiming for), and your solicitors are entitled to ask the question of what injuries are being claimed for and by whom.

 

It may not be a whiplash, it may be a back injury or anyone of a number of problems, but if you think the claim for injury is false, then you need to notify bboth your soilicitor and insurabce company so that this claim can be flagged up for further investigation.

 

But in regards of liability, based on your account of the circumstances, this sounds like one you will have to put your hands up and take it on the chin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...