Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

please help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4493 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all,

newby i have apriblem which i hope someone can help with, i have worked for a large retail company for 12 years,and due to no fault of my own my manager was sacked for fraud was shocked as i was the supervisor and never picked this up anyway to cut a very long story short i had to take over the store untill new manager was appointed i got taking a lend off for 3 months no sign of manager no help and eventualy it came to a head went off with stress then unions advised me to take them to court which has now just ended 4years later yes it took four years and i got not a penny iam still employed with this company, i asked my union to to ask my company what they would give me to go and what the have come back with is a laugh not a penny more that iam entitled to if i took my redunancy, so what my question is i called there bluff and said i want to go back to work thinking they would up the offer as i dont want to go back and iam sure they wont want me now after 4 years and taking them to court but they have said through my union rep they will hold a meeting with me i am shoked iam shaking writing this ,does any one think there now calling my bluff or will they have to phase return me back to my job, my other question is like a say 4 years the store now has a new supervisor and i dont think there is anywhere for me to go in this store but i dont want if i had to go back go anywhere else can they move me somewhere else please help:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

So...

 

(a) you worked for that company for 12 years as a supervisor;

(b) your manager was dismissed for fraud;

© you took over the shop and covered up until a new manager was engaged? (how long was that period of time for?)

(d) ''it came to a head'' and you went off with stress;

(e) you pursued a legal course of action against your employer ad it lasted for 4 years (is it safe to say that it all started in 2008?)

(f) you lost your case?

(g) you proposed some kind of ''compromise agreement''?

(h) apart from what would be due to you (statutorily), they are not prepapred to pay anything else?

(i) in order to trigger a reaction you offered to go back to working for them?

 

Now...

 

(1) are you off with work related stress for the past 4 years?

(2) has the company taken steps in relation to your ill health situation?

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your speedy reply yes i have always been covered with a sick note first it was stress then my doctor changed this to depression due to all that was going ie court case etc. at the beginning they did put in place oph then once the court case come up nothing i had never heard nothing off them for 3 half years till now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the first thing you should do is talk to the union representative and find out the motive of that meeting. Then you must attend that meeting... Two possibilites... (a) they discuss a possible phased return to work, or (b) they discuss an exit which would be satisfactory to both parties...

---Aut viam inveniam aut faciam---

 

***All advice given should be taken as guidance... Professional advice should always be taken before any course of action is pursued***

 

- I do not reply directly to any PMs, but you are more than welcome to enclose a link, in a PM, to your post. Thank you -

Make a contribution to this site... Help the CAG keeping on helping you for FREE.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have just read this,the differance with this is they have never tried to phase me back to work before at the beginning they did have me talking to there occupational health and her final reports where once i was feeling better i could resume my job and it the time i most probably would of went back to work as by then they had a new manager in place after 6 month of me leaving and i had a meeting with hr and the new manager in my home he promised me everything at the time said i would consider what he said then 3 days later got a phone call off my union rep saying that the new manager had handed in his notice the store was back to square one again i would be mad to go back, i was so upset as he must of known this when he was promising me everything that he was going to hand his notice in hence then it went to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi The problem you have is that you dont have any evidence of the phone call from your union rep.

 

My advise is to `just be guarded`and prepared for the worst outcome.

 

Also remember, the employer will try every dirty trick in the book to get rid of a `problem`and as for `usdaw`[your union, if i am right] are as useless as a choclate fireguard and I personally would not trust them.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...