Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shocking costs created by Tory led Government in 2012. Taxpayers brace for £100bn money-printing bill – as George Osborne says it’s ‘not my responsibility’ MSN WWW.MSN.COM  
    • Sorry, I may have forgot to get back on this. Please monitor for a reply tomorrow
    • Yes, now its just about getting the WS / Court bundle finalised to send to the court / Evri. I've attached the most recent version of the WS / Court bundle to save having to scroll back up to the previous post (#204) where it was also shared. If you, @BankFodder or anyone else has any feedback on this, i'd be grateful for your thoughts. In my previous post #204, i'd also attached an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at Her mes - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender [origin] and the recipient [destination] - I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice.  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (the sender / recipient) is involved in this transaction. I have also attached this redacted invoice in this post to save having to scroll back up. Happy to get any thoughts and if this invoice is no good, then please let me know.   Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • Does anyone know if I would be allowed to record conversations with health professionals for my own use on my phone without them knowing. I know that we are allowed to record phone calls. I do record some of my phone calls for my own use due to my disability and if anything is said then I am covered. I would only record audio in private area's of myself and the professional dealing with me. I know I could not get and other persons audio in it and I don't intend to. my only other option is to buy a body cam but I am not sure the rules regarding this.I never thought i would have to but things are getting worse Thanks for any guidance 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

London Scottish / Robinson Way (old) Default and CCJ advice needed


lsmcal1984
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4454 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

After my successes with other entries on my credit report, I have two big tickets from good old London Scottish.

 

Both relate to a joint £2000 loan I took out in November 2005 which I transferred into my own name in April 2006.

However, with interest added, the loan amounted to over £7,200!

 

A default – Defaulted in September 2006 to be deleted in September 2012

A CCJ – given in May 2007 to be deleted in May 2013.

 

I’m not making excuses for myself but as I was 21 at the time, I really had no idea what I was doing (neither did my partner, who was younger than me!)

Retrospectively, it was a highly irresponsible and hard-sold loan. Needless to say, I am older and (a lot) wiser now.

 

I moved around several times over the years and moved into my current place in February 2009.

In December 2010, I received a letter from Robinson Way: “this debt will not go away”.

They had done an “unrecorded enquiry” on my credit file on 21st December 2010 (this has since disappeared).

 

I am contemplating asking London Scottish/Robinson Way for all paperwork and information they hold on this case so I can consider what I want to do.

 

I have one concern before I do this – will the default/CCJ date ‘reset’ in some way, thus delaying its deletion in September 2012/May 2013 respectively?

 

My main concern is that next year (after May), I will be applying for a mortgage or ‘intermediate rent’ on a new development nearby.

This is why I have spent so much time cleaning up my credit file.

These two are the last negative entries that I have on my credit file, following much success from following the advice on here.

 

Retrospectively, I have thought they may try to renew the default automatically, forcing me to engage with them!

Hence I’d like to throw the first punch so to speak. Let sleeping dogs lie or try to prevent future problems?

 

Any advice would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

a 'new' default DOES NOT reset the SB date nor hold the debt on the CRA file any longer than the expiry of the first one.

you cannot have two defaults on the same debt.

 

the CCJ will fall off on its 6th birthday paid or not too.

 

now

i suspect the 'chasing' DCA knows NOWT aboout the CCJ

so dont tell them.

 

these is noway even if you PAY that you can get the CCJ removed before it expiry

so the call is yours.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

any update

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Sorry for the late reply. Sent my SAR in last week and received the following letter today (I can't post links yet as not enough posts):

 

We acknowledge with thanks your recent letter.

 

In reply, as we are the data processor and not the data controller, we have forwarded your Subject Access request onto our client.

 

If you have any queries, please don't hesitate to contact us and we will endeavour to assist you.

 

Rebecca Stott

Complaints and Compliance Manager

 

No idea what it actually means - will post more stuff as it arrives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar'es go to the oc not the dca

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I received the response to my SAR request, which included a selection of documents I have uploaded to the Robbersway (!) photo album on Photobucket (sorry, I am not allowed to post the link).

 

It includes:

A pre-contract agreement (not signed)

The credit agreement - both the original and borrower's copies (not signed)

A statement of account

A statement of price

The covering letter

 

Note the amount of PPI applied (over £800).

 

There are also 46 pages of phone logs, which may include some extra bits and pieces (phone number disconnected, address gone away - letter returned (before judgement!) - when I have time I will upload them.

 

Thinking about how to proceed next, especially with unsigned documents.

 

Any comments are appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

as a picture[jpg] file

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint program

but leave all figures and dates.

 

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf

than many single ones

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

then hit reply button

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you've got £24.51 for 35mts PPI to reclaim+8% stat

 

fill out the att xls

 

and i notice its says other idebtedness £427 was this a previous loan?

 

if so change goalposts.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

because although it wont be a lot

i bet PPI was on the past loan too

so you have PPI on PPI and PPI int on PPI int.

 

you need the old loans agreement too

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that is correct. The original loan agreement is attached to this message.

 

I have gone through the logs as well, here's a breakdown of some points that concern me:

 

02/05/07 - Summons/Writ issued and served

20/06/07 - Customer gone away

20/06/07 - Mail in - Judgement for claimant returned Gone Away

17/11/09 - Variation - offers £8.95 per month (so they do know about the CCJ; a copy is included)

 

The rest is just tracing and attempted calls.

 

At least I know the default and CCJ won't reset in some way.

 

I wasn't at the address when default and judgement were carried out - no proof that I told them either.

 

I'd like to get the default deleted - wondering if it is possible after all of this time.

original loan agreement.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

by the time you've argued the default will be gone.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

after all this time

the only way would be set aside

because the papers were served to the wrong address and you knew nothing about the proceedings at all until judgement

but it might be questioned why have you not done this before

 

by the time this gets through court

it'll be dead anyhow.

 

then you'ed still have the org debt to deal with and it'll

be listed somehow still/again as bad credit on your CRA still anyhow.

and for another 6yrs.

 

dx

 

 

you would need to know why the default was issued too

 

if it was continued late payment, then no amount of arguing will resolve it

as if you didn't pay, you didn't pay the markers/default was correct.

 

sar to the OC might the next move

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your all of your advice.

 

I'll leave it alone - at least I have the papers in case they attempt to re-register a default when this one expires in September (as I have read does happen!)

 

If they contact me about payment, I won't be calling/speaking to them. Any letters I could use to get them to go away?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignorance is best

 

get that PPU reclaim in and going

 

FOS CQ + SOC + complaint letter.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...