Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All. My other halfs car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online.   She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. Unfortunately, as we where travelling we missed all the post until last week. We recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i dug out the documents and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
    • you made it very confusing, though i doubt any of it was ever read by the delivery franchise for DPD. your saving grace might well be you didn't select your own address (though if you are all the same postcode..??) and neither mentioned a safe space other than another neighbour. but with the actual delivery address on the parcel, it appears the driver had a choice of 3 addresses, all under the same post code with differing house numbers. so chose the label one but left it on your doorstep. play it carefully and along with the photo and the retailers requirement you should be ok.   dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Faulty Computer item


drifter104
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4477 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I purchased a motherboard from an online retailer back in Jan 2010 along with a cpu and ram. I had a fault with both the ram and motherboard and they were exchanged around June 2010.

 

I recently purchased a new hard drive and found that the motherboard does not offer a particular feature it was described as having. Although I've only just found this out, there was no way of knowing it was missing this feature untill I had purchased a new hard drive. Basically a type of connection on this board is suppose to be able to offer speeds up to 6Gb/s, and it can actually only offer speeds lower than that. It can not and does not support that speed.

 

I've raised the issue with the retailer and the inital response was that it is described as having "up to" 6Gb/s. I replied pointing out that this motherboard does not offer that, and am now waiting for a reply.

 

Having dug a little deeper even if they offer an exchange they currently only stock one other item that would work with my cpu and ram (purchased at the same time as the motherboard) and that actually has the same part and therefore the same issue. As they were purchased together would I have any grounds to ask them to exchange the CPU and RAM as well?

 

At the moment if they swap the motherboard for something that does offer those speeds. I'd have to spend around another £350 replacing the CPU and RAM. Something I'm not happy to do as I purchased all 3 together because they were all designed to work together.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was my first thought but with broadband for example its not that the equipment (line/modem/exchange) that can't do that speed. Put it another way if virgin turned round and said you can have 50mb broadband, and you can get the whole 50mb but then only put in a cable that could support 40mb they have mis sold the product, even if they advertise up to 50mb, because you can't get it with what they provided.

 

it is an msi x58-gd65 by the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does say Up to 6Gb/s Data Transfer Bandwidth and thats dependant on the type of drive your using. If your using a 7200RPM drive then i doubt you will get close but if you was to use a solid state drive then it should hit very close to that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats just it, up until recently only been using standard 7200rpm, but have just got a ssdd and this is how I've found the problem. Also the chipset itself reports it can only run at 5Gb/s and is only running at 2.5Gb/s but neither msi or retailer can work out to get the 5Gb/s. Either way it certainly doesn't do up to 6, it only does up to 5.

Link to post
Share on other sites

here may be the answer, is it bits or bytes, (EG - 1 megabit - 1 megabyte)

 

By increasing the transfer rate up to 6Gb/s or 600 MB/s (megabytes per second), SATA

technology enables faster transfer of short bursts of data to and from the drive cache.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The faster 600MB/s transfer rates of SATA 6Gb/s provide a speedier, cost-effective solution and

an easier upgrade path for high-bandwidth applications in the future. Unlike other interfaces, the

SATA protocol is optimized for storage devices to provide the most efficient native drive

interface.

Have a read of the link below..

 

http://www.sata-io.org/documents/SATA-Revision-3.0-FAQ-FINAL.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just done a bit more digging and from what i can tell from reviews and replies there is ment to be a driver and bios update to resolve the problem released at some point, just don't say when.

 

So yes, not as described but possible to do as described if they get there finger out with updates.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for those.

 

Having read those links I'm happy that the item was not as described. The only two things that concern me are:-

 

1) the time period - I know this is the million dollar question but in this instance would 18 months beconsidered reasonable to have discovered this. I think it is because it isn't something that is "used" until it is needed, and I only used once an item needed replacing.

 

2) the items i brought with it - While on the same sale they are not faulty. However I don't believe the retailer will be able to supply me a replacement (if I get to that point) that will be able to offer the missing feature and work with the other items I purchased for use with the motherboard. In this case would I be within my rights to ask for them to be replaced as well? I fear not which leaves me out of pocket as I would need to replace them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I would go down the "partial refund route" and ask for the price of a 6gb/sec sata card. The spec says "Up to 6gb/sec" I would expect them to hide behind that. It may well be worth the £30 or so it would cost them to have the matter settled, but as it was 6 months ago, I wouldn't bank on it

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...