Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OpenAI and Reddit reach deal that will give ChatGPT access to content on the social media platform.View the full article
    • Even if that was not a PCN on your car, can you still swear that a PCN was not placed on your car ? NO Even if they showed you a copy of the PCN they sent, can you still wear that they actually sent the first PCN to you? NO Why are still quibbling  when the real argument is why they have broken the Act by telling you that you hadn't paid when in reality they shouldn't have sent that letter out probably until Monday which  would have been deemed received  on Wednesday? If you are that bothered about it, just leave out the start about the windscreen ticket since it isn't why you are complaining.
    • I am sorry that you have come across excel -possibly the most inhumane of all the rogues that ruin parking in private car parks. i am more sorry that I have missed your thread until now. As I understand it, their artic. was parked in front of their parking sign and the Blue badge places forcing you to stop somewhere else in the car park to observe the rules. On realising that even the Blue badge places were paid places and that you did not have the correct coinage you quite rightly decided to leave. Thus you had read their terms and until you have read them and signified your acceptance by either paying or staying, you are not classed as being parked.  You have a MINiMUM of five minutes  leave. Sadly Excel do not understand any words greater than two syllables which is where their problems start. Their greed, ignorance, inhumanity, etc etc all carry on from there. However they do know that Judges do understand what minimum means and are well aware of the Equality Act  so I wouldn't be too worried about what excel  will do. Plus we still have to see their PCN and when it comes to producing a Notice that complies with the Act relating to private car parks they do not excel at that. I hope that the Iceland MD will cancel the ticket. You still have a couple of other routes you could try. The first one is your Member of Parliament will probably be happy to help as they will need all the votes they can get with an election looming. Plus your local newspaper may also pitch in after hearing your story to go after Iceland and excel. [You may notice I have not merite them with a capital E as it is definitely undeserved.]
    • i would focus on a stupid youthful act. ...a waste of time... so what.. it's worked before. when is your hearing? dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Proving you checked in/out on oyster


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4427 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yes I did :-), was told best to use aliases.

 

I have attached the scan from tube station. Hope that helps

 

Danny

That scan is very interesting. The fare for the journey to Marylebone is right and the entries on that printout agree with what I would expect to see. Coming the other way it has zeroed the fare for Marylebone to Elephant & Castle because you have used the OSI to extend the journey into the NR station. The time for that first part of the journey appears to end at 12:46. The next entry looks like it is timed at 12:45. Can you confirm that as it's not 100% clear? If it is then it looks like this might have confused the system, or at least the movie reader. However, if you had touched out then I believe it would have adjusted the deduction to £3.40 again. The next touch is at Streatham, but by then you had exceeded the maximum journey time so it deducted another £4.60.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Mike.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the next entry is 12:48 the next train left at 12:49 which I could not take since I was not quick enough. So waited until the 1.03 train

 

The streatham one is understandable, since I was hauled off and waited for british transport police and with FCC people to verify my address which they could not do on the train. Once the BTP arrived and verified my address I was thrown out of the station and told to find my way home and not use public transport since they had blocked my oyster

 

Dan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Note at elephant and castle I believe there are TWO places for Oyster, one is as you enter from the shopping center and go down the stairs, the other is at the bottom of the stairs. There are no physical barriers (aside from two metal bars at the top) . I cannot actually confirm the oyster at the top but will be able to by Monday.

 

Dan

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the next entry is 12:48 the next train left at 12:49 which I could not take since I was not quick enough. So waited until the 1.03 train

 

The streatham one is understandable, since I was hauled off and waited for british transport police and with FCC people to verify my address which they could not do on the train. Once the BTP arrived and verified my address I was thrown out of the station and told to find my way home and not use public transport since they had blocked my oyster

 

Dan

So, just to clarify. After you had finished with BTP at Streatham, did you touch out or did they do it for you? That had actually blocked your card, although all that was needed was a topup to clear the £1.20 deficit.

 

From what I can see you had done nothing wrong. I don't know why the Movie reader didn't see you as in the system. You should get a refund from TfL to your card for £5.80 and FCC should refund the penalty fare. I also think you are due some compensation for unwarranted detention and subsequent stress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did not check out, since they guy at streatham opened the gates because they told him it was blocked. TFL have given a refund, but I am not sure for what. I did NOT pay the penalty fare since they said I had NOT touched in, hence I said I am not sure why I should pay. If they had said I had touched in incorrectly or something I would have paid no problem. The only thing I did was not to sign the form nor state that I agreed to their caution, since I did not fully understand it. I refused to sign the form since it had the incorrect destination entered and also had not been completed, which I felt was within my rights. I gave my oyster when they wished to check it, and gave my correct address.

 

One small question, how can I tell if I checked in our out, and do you get charged on a checkin i,e on entry or on exit (TFL and NR)

 

tks guys for everything, I will get my TRIM records from TFL and then await what FCC says. Is there a statute of limitations on this. Also urbanite mentioned strictly speaking I broke bylaw 18(2) read what that said but not so clued up on law, any ideas ?

 

 

 

Danny

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, sorry I'd been confusing your story with another where the PF had been paid. Someone touched your card out at Streatham at what looks like 14.28. Because this was over the maximum journey time from your original touch in at Marylebone it was treated as a new unstarted journey. This took your balance below zero which is why the gate didn't open.

 

When using PAYG you get a maximum fare deducted on entry. This is currently £4.60 off-peak at 99% of stations. When you touch out the deduction is adjusted to the correct fare, usually by crediting back an amount. If you touch in after an OSI the system re-deducts up to the maximum fare and then recalculates the correct overall fare when you touch out again. On your statement the 12:48 line is a touch in because it says Pre Pay Entry at Elephant & Castle. The 14:28 line is a touch out at Streatham (5383) with a missing start location. Had you touched out at Mitcham Eastfileds within the maximum journey time those two lines would have been replaced with something like Marylebone - 5069 via zone 1 thru £3.40.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfect tks, just one last question , at elephant and castle I believe there are two oyster places, is their any difference between the two or should I have touched at one or the other....

 

Danny

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perfect tks, just one last question , at elephant and castle I believe there are two oyster places, is their any difference between the two or should I have touched at one or the other....

 

Danny

I don't know how many readers there are but it doesn't matter which one you use, no. The only different sort are the ones attached to a ticket machine used for topping up. If it's gates then you must touch on a reader with an orange light and not one with a red light. This corresponds to the way the gate is set up (either entry or exit) and applies even if it is locked open. Platform validators like at Elephant and Castle NR handle both entry and exit so it doesn't matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add there are different Pink Oyster readers that arnt the standard in/out ones..they are used to prove you used a certain route...for example zone 6 to 6 but avoided all of zone 1, thuis the journey is cheaper.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

No routing data? That's a new one for me!

Most journeys show this. All it means is that there is only one route between the two stations. When there is more than one (ie alternate fares) it says which one was used.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys what is a TRIM report, I called TFL today to get one, and they did not have a clue what one was, so it was like the blind leading the blind. I have a journey report which was emailed to me by TFL is that one and the same thing ?

 

Danny

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys what is a TRIM report, I called TFL today to get one, and they did not have a clue what one was, so it was like the blind leading the blind. I have a journey report which was emailed to me by TFL is that one and the same thing ?

 

Danny

I believe that TRIM is TfL's internal system for tracking Oyster useage. I'm not surprised that you have had difficulty getting it because I had the same issue when helping another person last year. If the journey report is like a statement detailing your journeys over the last 8 weeks then that isn't the report that Urbanite is talking about. However, it might be enough anyway. In fact the printout from Wimbledon that you scanned last night tells me that you did touch in at Elephant and Castle NR, so you've probably got enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Example of a JSR compared to a normal journey statement. In my case, I really needed it because the conventional statements were utterly useless. I agree with MikeWh that the statement you hold, dan2011, is sufficient.

 

378807_10151149453685075_812995074_22343537_822024262_n.jpg

Edited by The Urbanite
Link to post
Share on other sites

tks urbanite, I have the first table not the second, i.e the one with the status column. Can I get this from TFL if so what do I need to ask for. I asked for the journey log and they emailed me that

 

Danny

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Hi

 

Yes just got a letter from the prosecutions dept. They want me to send a report of the journey made BEFORE they decide whether or not to prosecute. Before I do this I have one query. IN the attached printout, I have shown my TFL journey printout. At 11.38 it says Elephant and castle No routing data and 12.07 Marylebone via zone 1 thr and charges me £3.40 what does this mean. The reason I ask is that I started the journey at Mitcham Eastfields and went to E & C overrail, then left the station, went to E & C tube and to Marylebone on the tube. Does that line show this or not ? Personally it does not seem to, since there is no mention of Mitcham Eastfields ?

 

Danny

photo (4).jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Danny,

 

Mitcham Eastfields is shown, but only as it's NLC code. I'll describe all the entries relating to that day so you (and they) can be clear what it shows.

 

  1. 11.18 Auto Pre-Pay £10.00 This is a top up.
  2. 11:36 5069 - Elephant and Cas No Routing Data £0.00 This is the first stage of your journey where the charge was zeroed by touching in at the other end of the OSI.
  3. 12:07 5069 - Marylebone via zone 1 Thru £3.40 This represents the whole journey from Mitcham to Marylebone which is a through NR+TfL journey including zone 1.
  4. 12:46 Marylebone - Elephant&C No Routing Data £0.00 This is the first stage of your second journey where the charge was zeroed by touching in at the other end of the OSI.
  5. 12:46 Pre-Pay Entry Elephant & Cas £4.60 This is where it goes wrong. This shows you entering the NR station to continue your journey but instead it has started a new journey. As this wasn't finished in time it is left as just the off-peak maximum fare.
  6. 14:36 Unstarted - 5383 No Routing Data £4.60 This was when you touched out at Streatham. Because you exceeded the maximum journey time from Elephant this is treated as a new unidentified journey with another off-peak maximum fare.

Since you originaly posted this I have discovered something which I think may be at fault with the Oyster system. It looks like you touched back in at Marylebone within a few minutes of touching out at the end of your first journey. That appears to be confusing the system because it thinks you are continuing your first journey. I'm not 100% sure what is happening, but I've raised a FOI request to find out. I've had reports of similar issues occuring at several other stations where the common factor is that they are part of an OSI with another station. Although the RPI on the FCC train saw you as out of the system, had you been able to touch out in the normal way at Mitcham Eastfields then the correct fare would have been charged. Instead your card had 2x£4.60 deducted where it should have been £3.40.

Please feel free to copy my explanation directly to FCC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou very much

 

I know why the error is at Elephant and Castle its because I was taken off the train, and the one at streatham is that I had to wait for an hour on 'hold' until I was processed and allowed out of the gates. So as long as it shows that I touched in through my journey its all good.

 

The letter I received from the prosecution department is not a fine or anything, not even a summons. There request is

 

"they would be obliged if I could obtain a print out from TFL and send it to them. and the letter "seeks an explanation about the ALLEGED incident of fare evasion that took place..." Ironic that its now become alleged incident.

 

Once they receive the info they : will be able to make an informed decision about how the department will be going forward with this case".... :-)

 

Let me send my printout to them, and then we can take it from there once they decide to drop the prosecution.

 

Danny

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Journey Status Report will provide sufficent evidence that you validated when required in a format that FCC will be able to understand and unable to refute. However as you don't seem very bothered about following my advice then I wish you the best of luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Journey Status Report will provide sufficent evidence that you validated when required in a format that FCC will be able to understand and unable to refute. However as you don't seem very bothered about following my advice then I wish you the best of luck!

I think that's a little unfair, The Urbanite. 99% of all helpdesk staff have absolutely no idea what a JSR is. I'm fairly confident that my thorough explanation of his card printout will be enough to convince FCC that he did touch where he should have done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...