Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wow thats incredible. Thank you so much
    • If the purchaser denies having received it then sue P2G. If you simply don't hear anything more from the purchaser then you have the purchaser's name and address – and frankly for £48 I would go ahead and sue. As long as you have good proof of delivery then your chances of success are probably better than 95% and frankly the purchaser would probably put their hands up as they would effectively be being sued for the civil equivalent of theft. I wouldn't let it go if I were you. It would be a good exercise for you and gives you confidence the next time something comes up which is may be much more valuable
    • Thank you again Emmzzi for your insight. Not only did I do the work, but as a maths tutor delivering financial literacy workshops under the Govt Multiply project, the college were paid £400 for each student I recruited, which makes it an even bigger kick in the teeth! I spoke to Citizens Advice Bureau on Friday who advised me to go back to ACAS for advice and assistance, as ACAS are the experts in employment matters. They did also mention small claims court, as being more straightforward and less complex, but surely their solicitor would just contest this and I would lose the £80 court fee? If I did submit a claim through the small claims court, would I just leave the employment tribunal running until the outcome? The deadline for me to submit my schedule of loss is tomorrow, so I will submit today so that they cannot hold me in breach.
    • Ive just checked the tracking again and its actually out for delivery today! Anyway,  I refunded the buyer on Ebay off my own back on the 2nd of June they havent opened a case or anything like that so surely i cant take action against either the buyer or P2G/ Evri can i ? Id hope the buyer would see fit and pay but you know what people are like these days ... Once its delivered I'll send him a polite message asking for payment but i suspect there'll be no reply      
    • Thanks for this update. Let's not if you have any more difficulty – in particular if you have difficulty getting paid back from the purchaser. We can help you either against the parcel delivery courier or against the purchaser
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

First Plus PPI loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4561 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok, am after some help here please. I have trawled the forums from cover to cover and cant seem to find the definitive answer I require.

 

I am trying to help sort out a claim for a family friend. He was going to deal with one of those SPAM PPI reclaim companies as after reviewing his personal circumstances, he was clearly MISSOLD this policy.

 

I told him we can do for nothing with help from the forums. At first I thought it was simply a case of taking the amount of PPI amount that was front loaded and applying a 8% charge for the reclaim, but the more I read, the more detail and complex it seems to be getting ( am I wrong ?)

 

He took out a loan with First Plus back in 2007 which had PPI as a single premium added to it. To date the loan and PPI is still in effect.

 

I have ascertained that the proportion of his monthly payment equates to 16.6% of his monthly payment, and have calculated what amount each of his monthly payments was for PPI. (made easy by the spreadsheet, thank you BTW)

 

So if I got it correct, I have added all these amounts together (well the spreadsheet has, excellent bit of kit) and got a total amount of charges plus an interest amount for the reclaim.

 

Now this is where Im getting a bit confused with reading too many others post I think , but what Im not grasping is what do I do about the remainder of the payments.

 

The loan was for a period of 7 years and has 2 years remaining. The PPI was front loaded at the beginning and so will have had interest added to it for the entirety of the loan. So wont technically speaking the remaining of the 2 years payments have an amount of PPI still included within it.

 

Or is this something that First Plus address and recalculate the loan and payments to a position they would have been had he not taken out the PPI in the first place. So in effect reduce the monthly payments accordingly for the remainder of the term.

 

(Not sure but have I just answered my own questioned?)

 

Any guidance, gratefully received.

 

Oh didnt there used to be a template letter library on CAG, not that its hard to churn out a letter I suppose.

See a penny, pick it up, all day long you will have good luck!!!!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

You have answered your own question.

 

The remainder of the two years will (or should) be treated as a restructure of the loan to remove the remaining PPI and associated intrest from the equation. Thus the loan will either be shortened of the repayments stay the same, or the term will stay the same but the repayments drop a little.

 

You've done your spreadie, all you need now is the fos questionnaire (available from the fos website) and a brief letter to the lender enclosing said questionnaire duly completed and a copy of the spresadie.

 

Then sit back and wait as they have 12 weeks to investigate and give a final decision.

 

Regards

 

ims

  • Confused 1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I rang first plus to enquire about statements, I told them that I was looking to claim mis sold PPI. They asked a couple of questions - 'i was not told that the ppi would only last 5 years and that i would be still paying for it even though it was finished.' a week later I had a letter in post stating they would look into it and would get back in 12 weeks. Got a letter back a week or so ago ' Ok, we hold up our hands - take the money' there calculations came out better than mine slightly. but as I had the premium repaid after the five years I'm not going to get what I was hoping. and if I take the money they would basicaly recalculate with the premium put back on and my payments would go up. ( not by much, but still would go up)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...