Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. Anyway I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Default notice for car finance


Lucifa42
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4561 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On 27/10/11 our car was written off.

Our insurance company paid out the total loss settlement to the finance company, and there was a shortfall of about 1000 pounds.

We have gap insurance however, and put in a claim with them but it took some time as the Gap company requested a lot of documents so the full claim was not submitted until 18/11/11 and takes 10-15 days to settle.

We have been in contact with the finance company throughout and told them about the gap claim. Incidentally the finance company and gap company are owned by the same parent company.

Last week, on 28/11/11 we received a default notice from the finance company to our great surprise. We have not been in any payments arrears during our time with the finance, our monthly payment was taken as usual on 28/10/10 and again on the 28/11/11 (day we received the default notice).

What I'm asking really is: have they been hasty in issuing a default notice for this? We were more than happy to continue paying the monthly payments until the gap claim had been settled.

We have also been charged 30 pounds for the DN, something we are not happy about.

 

As it is, the gap claim has now been settled today so we are in advance of the date on the DN (12/12/11) so it should be all settled.

Oh and secondly: will this default notice be recorded on my credit record, or does only actual defaulted accounts get recorded?

 

Thank you

Apologies for the formatting in my posts, I do put paragraphs in but the forum removes them for some reason :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get onto the credit reference agencies and see what it says on there. If your payments have continued without a break I can't see what the DN is for.

 

Was the write-off a third parties fault or yours? If a third parties, I hope things are in hand to claim back every penny you are out of pocket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I should have pointed out the DN is for breaking the terms of the finance agreement regarding the 'selling on' of the car. I suppose with the car being written off and the insurance company 'buying' it off me this is the clause I have broken. I would have thought though there was a special exclusion for 'selling on' if it's because of a write off.

I will be checking my credit rating as soon as I get home.

 

No third party was involved with the write off.

Apologies for the formatting in my posts, I do put paragraphs in but the forum removes them for some reason :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shame about the third party.

 

Be certain that the DN isn't accompanied with some sort of charge for you breaching the agreement.

 

This would really seem like and unfair term in the agreement and the 'un-necessary' default notice and marking of your credit file will have caused you distress and damage.

 

If there is a mark on your CF, then write telling them you want it off, use a court threat if they refuse or just change it to satiisfied and then carry out that threat if they fail to remove it.

 

The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999

 

and

 

The Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Couldn't wait til I got home as I'm worried about this. Signed up for free trial with Experian (date in calendar marked to cancel it) :) and I can't see anything obvious in there about a default. My rating is 999 and there are no sections marked red.

So with it being settled now I should be ok, but still not happy about the £30 - I will write to them about that.

Apologies for the formatting in my posts, I do put paragraphs in but the forum removes them for some reason :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lou Cipher :)

check the terms of your agreement re accidents/writeoff. how can the insurer 'buy' the car from you as you say when they have dealt with the finance company and they still have title? the amount they paid out is short of your finance? so, you would be liable for the shortfall? but, your gap insurance covered the shortfall? so, if a default does appear, complain and get it removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are a few CRA's and they don't necessarily use them all, but the one they have used, if they have used one, must be told to you in a letter. Have another look to see if anything is there.

 

Don't let this worry you Lucifa, there is no crime or anything like that here, just a company who thinks they have found a way to make a few extra bucks. This is typical of finance and insurance companies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...