Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

AA Breakdown cover didn't cover me


CharlieChan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2807 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

23/11/2011 I am a first time user of the AA and I have never been spoken to or dealt with in a disgraceful manner. I took out the AA roadside recovery and they pestered me to take this all singing all dancing Breakdown cover where they pay up to £500 towards your car if they cannot fix it. I have tried to get them to sort this out and have had to write several letters and now been told that I have to wait 8 weeks for them to look at my complaint and get back to me.............The story goes in summary form dont want to bore you all.

 

But my car broke down loss of power and I called the AA out he could not fix it and offered to follow me home to make sure that the car would get back to my home, I told him that I would be calling the AA for this new service, which I did as the AA Patrolman said an wrote it on the sheet I should get my car to a garage for a diagnostic test so I went to a garage that he recommended to me, I took it very slowly to the garage who said it was a sensor and timing chain which would cost £545+vat I was at no time told I should not drive my car, but I took the car home to phone this insurance company run by the AA which I did I was told to get the garage to call them and they would sort it out.

 

The garage did their part and was told that the claim would be declined I called the customer service dept to be told the reason for the decline was ( I DROVE MY CAR HOME) and she then told me in a sarcastic manner that if I didnt get my car fixed and their was another problem and it was caused by the first claimed problem it too would be declined , I complained about her and the way I have been treated and then they called my home to offer me home recovery and start, i declined, I have also cancelled the payment for this recovery scheme as while this customer complains person looks at the problem and makes a decision I was paying for a part I could not use , they were not happy with that but they took the scheme off the direct debit.

 

Overall I feel that I have been cheated and conned out of my hard earned cash with nothing but a sorry from the AA, and the female who was sarcastic to me she will get a wrap on the knuckles and probably a bonus I have also been told finally I can take it to the Financial Ombusman and they are as far as I can go , but I see from somoen on here they wrote to the chairman maybe more should do that and I am going to give it a bash , what does other think ?

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the forum Charlie. I think this deserves a thread of it's own so that we can work out why the drive home would annul the cover.

 

I will call your thread 'AA breakdown cover didn't cover me', but if you want the subject as something else, just say.

 

Can you tell us the make and model of the car and also further details of what the garage said was the problem and what they did to repair it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What does it say in the terms and conditions of this breakdown cost cover?

does it say if they cant repair it at the roadside you must take it directly to a garage for repair!

On checking the terms and conditions it would appear that you do in fact have to arrange for it to be taken dirctly to a garage and also that the car cannot continue to be driven.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

My Car is a BMW 318I on a 52 Plate and the Garage told me the timing chain had to be repaired and the 2 tension arms and Crank Sensor needs to be replaced, I have not had the car repaired and it is sitting in my driveway and I am getting a lift too and from work at the mo

Link to post
Share on other sites

As with most insurance policies and motor ones (warranties etc.) in particular they will find anyway at all not to payout!

Suggest you plugging away at them and rely on what the patrolman advised and yes write/email to the top man.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Just an update as expected I have just opened my mail from this morning as I just got in from work, and well they are still declining my claim and of course the much used work we are sorry your not happy, they are now blaming the Garage for saying that the part was not faulty but just worn and that I had driven the car away from the Garage and in their words

 

" Breakdown Repair Cover " is for vehicles which are in a "breakdown situation and can not continue the journey safely " also the vehicle "needs a repair or replacement of insured parts to enable the journey to be resumed or if Applicable commenced.

 

As part worn not suddenly failed and the vehicle driven away from garage I have to uphold the decision taken to refuse your claim on this occasion in line with the BRC terms and conditions

 

DONT THEY GET IT I WAS AT NO TIME TOLD NOT TO DRIVE MY CAR

 

As for the call handler you spoke with on the 8th of Nov 2011 our Motto is 'Courtesy and Care' and we expect our staff to behave accordingly, I am sorry that you feel you were not treated more politley and helpfully when you contacted the Claims Dept , I realise that this may only have added to your worry of the situation .

 

I understand your disappointment with our service and assure you that we do our utmost to prevent similar occurances in the future, I have investigated the circumstances regarding this particular indcident and have brought it to the attention of the individual concerned, I am confident that they will take all necessary corrective action..........What the blazes does that mean?

 

Finally as we have already carried out our internal review, any further appeal against our decision lies with the underwriterof the Breakdown Repair Cover .all appeal actions must be sent to :

 

AA Breakdown Repair Cover , Acromas Insurance Company Limited, Fanum House Basingstoke Hampshire , and guess who owns this .......................

But I will go on with this .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand your disappointment with our service and assure you that we do our utmost to prevent similar occurrences in the future, I have investigated the circumstances regarding this particular incident and have brought it to the attention of the individual concerned, I am confident that they will take all necessary corrective action..........What the blazes does that mean?
it means that they told the woman not to do it again.

 

I was at no time told I should not drive my car,
I think that's what they are saying. your car didn't break down due to a failed part.

the parts only need replacing due to wear and tear.

 

I'm guessing that what their £500 repair policy means is.

If you're driving down the road and the clutch/brakes goes in your car, then it's broken down and can't be driven safely.

then your car would be loaded onto a truck, taken to a garage and they would contribute towards the cost of fixing the breakdown.

Or if you're going down the road and your wiper blades break then they'd pay for the cost of the wiper blades to get you moving again.

 

But in this situation they are saying that you didn't breakdown, your car lost some power (possibly in some kind of limp home mode due to the sensor), and that you were able to safely drive the car. Also the timing chain is a service item if that'd actually broken (not just worn) then you'd have not been able to drive the car at all (then it would have clearly broken down),

 

But the sensors (as far as I know) don't wear, they just break, they either work or don't.

So you might suggest that this was broken. and that they should cover this?

 

you might try arguing that a worn timing chain would be more susceptible to breaking. (and the breaking of that would cause catastrophic engine failure, and immediate loss of power, -probably immediate loss of motion as well) so your car could not be driven safely. (And you're very disappointed that they allowed you to drive the car without advising you of this.)

-basically you;d be arguing, it had indeed broken down and was in a state where it should not have been driven. (and therefore should have been recovered to start with.) and as the initial fault was a genuine breakdown they should cover the parts on their insurance scheme.

 

I've not read the T&C's (don't know where they are), but you'd surely expect that the roadside assistance guy would tell you/remind you that you shouldn't drive the car. (as it would affect the validity of your cover) rather than telling you to drive, but slowly so that they could follow you.

(can you be expected to remember every clause of T&C's in this kind of situation?

 

This isn't any kind of legal advise, just what I understand from what you've written on here. expressed as a what I guess they are saying, and what you might like to try saying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi Carl. It's very unlikely that the clutch would be covered by any over the counter policy, so it was just a ploy to get you to buy. If you can show that clutch cover was the main thing that pursuaded you to buy, then claim back, unless you have had work done under the warranty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks I went to a shoping centre today and found an aa stand .I let them think I was a new customer and asked what repairs or covered,they told me again cluch is covered,he said If your cluch was to go ,the aa would take to garrage and repair

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to be able to show that is what was said and then you can claim your premium back. Unfortunately the majority of these warranties cover next to nothing. They really are a waste of money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just come across this and wondered how the OP got on? What puzzles me is why the AA didn't tow the car to the garage if it had a timing chain issue. It would be interesting if we could get an up date. I'm always getting things though from the AA trying to sell me additional services!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

23/11/2011 I am a first time user of the AA and I have never been spoken to or dealt with in a disgraceful manner. I took out the AA roadside recovery and they pestered me to take this all singing all dancing Breakdown cover where they pay up to £500 towards your car if they cannot fix it. I have tried to get them to sort this out and have had to write several letters and now been told that I have to wait 8 weeks for them to look at my complaint and get back to me.............The story goes in summary form dont want to bore you all.

 

But my car broke down loss of power and I called the AA out he could not fix it and offered to follow me home to make sure that the car would get back to my home, I told him that I would be calling the AA for this new service, which I did as the AA Patrolman said an wrote it on the sheet I should get my car to a garage for a diagnostic test so I went to a garage that he recommended to me, I took it very slowly to the garage who said it was a sensor and timing chain which would cost £545+vat I was at no time told I should not drive my car, but I took the car home to phone this insurance company run by the AA which I did I was told to get the garage to call them and they would sort it out.

 

The garage did their part and was told that the claim would be declined I called the customer service dept to be told the reason for the decline was ( I DROVE MY CAR HOME) and she then told me in a sarcastic manner that if I didnt get my car fixed and their was another problem and it was caused by the first claimed problem it too would be declined , I complained about her and the way I have been treated and then they called my home to offer me home recovery and start, i declined, I have also cancelled the payment for this recovery scheme as while this customer complains person looks at the problem and makes a decision I was paying for a part I could not use , they were not happy with that but they took the scheme off the direct debit.

 

Overall I feel that I have been cheated and conned out of my hard earned cash with nothing but a sorry from the AA, and the female who was sarcastic to me she will get a wrap on the knuckles and probably a bonus I have also been told finally I can take it to the Financial Ombusman and they are as far as I can go , but I see from somoen on here they wrote to the chairman maybe more should do that and I am going to give it a bash , what does other think ?

 

You can go to the FSA as well, but the more similar complaints that come to their attention the better. I need some help please. Does anyone have a Membership letter dated in late 2009 to 2010 as I need to compare the wording please? (EDIT) Thanks.

Edited by maroondevo52
Removed phone number.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, Wookey Hole.

 

I have removed your phone number, any user can send you a Private Message with the information you require.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stay away from AA home emergency as well, again wording is mischief, radiator leak in bedroom, I did all the necessary as advised, they came out 9 p.m.ish brought a few tools and a valve (not the problem) they said will get a replacement radiator, oh dear have to be to-morrow so will come back to fit it, morning came phone the cost of new radiator is 40.00 fitting is 85.00, I had checked prices of radiator required i..e. £18.99 fitting cost £25.00 with inhibitor, so when mentioned about the cost is covered told , no we stopped the leak (I had by turning Radiator off), we have done our part of the contract they said on the phone, so I politly told them goodby.

 

Got the whole thing replaced incl hibitor for £50.00 incl materials.

 

 

Trouble with the AA/RAC is they were Privatised, customer service comes 2nd/ profit 1st, being an old RAC Patrol 30-40 years ago on call 24hours a day and knowing what repairs we undertook etc we did then and experianced certain Patrols job now

a lot not all Just try to garage your car.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

BMW of this age and model type suffering from timing chain issue 99.9% of the time due to lack of correct or routine service lack lubrication the guides wear out and tensioner fail due poor lubrication!

 

The fact that the garage themselves have said it's worn and terms and conditions say no wear and tear also your car has to be maintained in lines with manufacture service intervals

 

I'd put money on it that it was Lack lubrication see it all the time

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the issue is AA BRC customers treat this policy as a warranty which it is not and also don't fully read or understand the terms written in bold about what breakdown is

 

As a garage owner that deals with this cover daily it's a very rare occasion that the AA are unreasonable but alas every barrel has a rotting apple

 

Key words to remember if it's

 

Worn or worn out , wear and tear , corroded ,, rusted , blocked or contaminated

 

These all can be classified as general wear and tear

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...