Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
    • Hello!  Wondering if someone can help with this.  I suspect not but worth a go.  I appreciate the "contract is with the seller" line, which is what Evri has fed me but wanted to see if someone with experience in these things could suggest anything else I could do here.  I appreciate there are many topics about lost parcels - My parcels weren't lost, until the driver walked up to my door with them and then decided to make them lost/stolen... I'll summarise what has happened.  Wednesday of last week - Evri delivery driver stole / walked off with 3 of my parcels.  -  Arrived outside my properly, took photos (3 separate photos as its 3 separate deliveries) of the tops of the parcels (pointlessly zoomed in on just the labels, couldn't see anything else, other than a small piece of the pavement and a little weed, which doubly confirms it was outside my door as I can see the same plant), marked the order as delivered and walked off with them.  He's marked on the Evri GPS marked that he was outside.   -  3 different deliveries, from the same company (same boxes etc.), but 3 separate tracking numbers. -  Went through the Evri bot which opened a case on each tracking number.  I then phoned them and left a voicemail explaining what had happened. -  24 hours later had a canned response asking me if the packages had turned up and to check around etc..  I responded explaining again what happened and that they've definitely been taken. -  4 days later,  this morning, I get a response telling me to ask the merchant to refund me. I've responded to this message with a long email, repeating what I said, that I believe the driver has stolen these packages and that he took those suspicious top down shots of the packages, marked them as delivered without ringing or knocking etc.  I've said that I expect them to investigate further, but I gather they won't. In my several messages to them initially and later, I told them I don't care about a refund and wanted the parcels.  They contain some sentimental stuff, nothing of high monetary value, hence me going to this trouble.  I only paid £25 for the contents. I did contact the merchant when this first happened and they asked me to wait a few days.  They ended up refunding me despite me asking them not to and that I wanted them to escalate it with Evri because this appears to be a case of theft.  They didn't seem bothered - Refunded me and told me to go back to Evri and escalate it with them? So - Is there any way to compel Evri to conduct a proper investigation with this driver?  Search for my parcels? I have quite a lot of deliveries handled by Evri (not out of choice) - They used to have a fantastic chap and I rarely had any issues.  He has been replaced by a new guy and I believe the route is handled by this same guy who I believe has taken my packages.  Naturally, I fear this is going to happen again in the future if no investigation occurs. Appreciate any assistance - Thanks for reading. Al.  
    • its not a good thing or a bad thing its ongoing. mines gone the same route. these new notifications are equally meaningless.
    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cap1 & CCA return


tamadus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4972 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Also Pam, I spoke with the OFT about my request and the fact I was sent an agreement with no prescribed terms and they ahven;t sent mee terms and consitions.

 

His exact words were: "Although we don't get involved in individual cases, we would be very interested if you could send in details about your case so that we have all available information to make sure we make the right decision when considering to renew their credit license."

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

so un1 - ignoring me again - what on earth have I done to deserve this?:(

 

please tell me WHAT IS A CIVIL OFFENCE????!!!!

 

Oh God Ladybird, I am soooo sorry - I didn't see your post (and I went back to check for replies).

 

I am so sorry, I have been in a meeting all morning and I have a migrane - I just wanna go home! :(

 

The offences of commited as part of the CCA are civil - the police sargeant last nite said that he ahd looked through databases and books and couldn't find anything to say it was criminal.

 

I also found a section saying that your local weights and measures enforcer (Trading Standards) has to enforce offences under the Act! :)

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou un1!!

I happily stand corrected then.

And then Dave777 is reading this correctly.

I shall go and research penalties for a civil offence. (Hanging...? Death by electrocution...? .....Punishment by the CCA witches coven....?

 

This is not the thread to be on if you have a migraine un1 - it probably caused it in the first place!

 

I could come & soothe your brow;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I could come & soothe your brow;)

 

WHAT?? After stealing Perseus from Corn AND leaving tam to drink his scotch alone last night!? You wayward 'witch' you!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

VITAL - IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE ABOUT THE INCREASED BAILIFFS' POWERS TO BREAK INTO YOUR HOME AND USE FORCE IN ORDER TO GET YOUR GOODS THEN JOIN THE PETITION HERE:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....l#post53879 9

 

Anyone seeing this who wants to help by copying it to their signature please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Okay, let's change the subject then - back to that other minefield known as s85! All those with headaches/hangovers look away now! :eek:

 

I have been itching to hit my CC providers with this potential 'default' under s85 but after looking at the relevant sections of the CCA, the 1983 regs and the CC documents I have in my possession again and again, I have now come to the conclusion that there is likely to be no mileage in this issue for many of us.

 

to recap - s85 states:

 

85 Duty on issue of new credit-tokens

(1) Whenever, in connection with a credit-token agreement, a credit-token (other than the first) is given by the creditor to the debtor, the creditor shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it.

(2) If the creditor fails to comply with this section—

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

The 1983(cancellation notices and copies of documents) regs. state in relation to this:

 

Copies of credit-token agreements where the agreement contains a power of variation

 

8. Every copy of an executed credit-token agreement given to the debtor under section 85(1) of the Act where the agreement may be varied under a power contained in it shall comprise an easily legible statement of the current terms of the agreement (whether or not varied in accordance with section 82( 1) of the Act).

 

We have debated what is meant by the choice of the word comprise and have found that one definition is 'include' which would fit with our preferred interpretation of what is required under s85.

 

BUT - Every other section of these regs. that contains a description of what a copy must contain or consist of, under the various different circumstances, uses the word INCLUDE!

 

Why would section 8 then use a different word (comprise) if it actually means include?

 

So, my conclusion is that for a copy under s85 the creditor is only obliged to sent a copy of the current terms of the agreement (whether or not varied) as per s8 of the regs.

 

This actually appears to be happening in many cases, with either a separate copy of the T&Cs being sent with the new CC or the current terms being printed on the actual 'mailer'.

 

I don't see why the CCA would insist on the creditor sending a copy of the whole original agreement anyway because there is no similar requirement to periodically remind you of your agreement for any other type of credit and I think that the only reason this 'copy' is required on the renewal of credit tokens is because the terms are almost always variable.

 

So, I personally will not be going down this route unless I find that one of my CC providers has not sent the 'copy' of T&Cs at all, in which case I will test the water.

 

I have my body armour in position now and am ready for the expected onslaught - so hit me with it!! :eek:

 

Regards, Pam

 

 

 

VITAL - IF YOU HAVE AN ISSUE ABOUT THE INCREASED BAILIFFS' POWERS TO BREAK INTO YOUR HOME AND USE FORCE IN ORDER TO GET YOUR GOODS THEN JOIN THE PETITION HERE:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o....l#post53879 9

 

Anyone seeing this who wants to help by copying it to their signature please do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou un1!!

I happily stand corrected then.

And then Dave777 is reading this correctly.

I shall go and research penalties for a civil offence. (Hanging...? Death by electrocution...? .....Punishment by the CCA witches coven....?

 

This is not the thread to be on if you have a migraine un1 - it probably caused it in the first place!

 

I could come & soothe your brow;)

 

Oh for GOD's SAKE!!!:rolleyes:

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the CCP hasn't signed the application form (in my MBNA case), they cannot comply with the act at all as they don't have an executed agreement to send a 'copy' of. If they sent me a copy of the agreement with my signature on it they still wouldn't comply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou un1!!

I happily stand corrected then.

And then Dave777 is reading this correctly.

I shall go and research penalties for a civil offence. (Hanging...? Death by electrocution...? .....Punishment by the CCA witches coven....?

 

It would probably be a civil penalty then, lol.....I call it all civil offence (same thing)

 

This is not the thread to be on if you have a migraine un1 - it probably caused it in the first place!

 

Tell me about it! It was the meeting I was in that caused it - 4 hours!!!

 

I'm feeling better now, had some painkillers! (I only take them when I am work....)

 

I could come & soothe your brow;)

 

Oh Ladybird, but what about Perseus and Tam?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

No!

 

This is a Criminal Offence.

 

However, there is nothing to stop one taking civil action against the creditor.

 

AC

 

AC, the police sargeant that I spoke with last night says it isn't - so does my dad who is also a police sargeant! :)

 

They both said that if it is a criminal offence then they would have to investigate it, if not then they don;t get involved!

 

Any idea what makes you think it's a criminal offence?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm giving up!

 

What are you giving up?

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that every case is different re S85

 

This is my situation:-

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions/10900-loan-company-cannot-supply-90.html?highlight=angry+cat#post609716

 

Now an update...

Just put the phone down from TS

My local TS fair trading officer does not accept the MS attempted get out, which is because they have sent albeit very late a wrong issue dated set of T&C's under the 1983 copies of docs regs, by sending these MS suggest that they have now complied. Of course, these T&C's were sent on a generic CC mailer with no card, no credit limit, well a zero credit limit!!!

 

TS are very pleasant and helpful to me, but as I was told today they (TS) have no case law to go on, therfore, it doesn't appear that they have prosecuted on an CCA S78 offence before? I offered up the Wilson v love case but wasn't sure if that case would be valid in my particular situation.

Anyhow, TS are still investigating for me, I also stated in the nicest possible manner, that I am extremely concerned re: the MS criminal offence and that I will be putting on some pressure for TS to prosecute.

I do know that TS have been communicating with MS about the MS 1983 reg view which TS does not appear to share.

 

Lastly, TS will be getting back to me next week after further investigations.

 

Love AC

 

ps I remebered to ask as to whether the CCA S78 breach is as I was formally advised a Criminal Offence...answer yes. Futher, I also enquired as what doc. the information comes from...answer it is in the TS notes and I will be advised as to which doc. next week

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that every case is different re S85

 

This is my situation:-

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions/10900-loan-company-cannot-supply-90.html?highlight=angry+cat#post609716

 

Now an update...

Just put the phone down from TS

My local TS fair trading officer does not accept the MS attempted get out, which is because they have sent albeit very late a wrong issue dated set of T&C's under the 1983 copies of docs regs, by sending these MS suggest that they have now complied. Of course, these T&C's were sent on a generic CC mailer with no card, no credit limit, well a zero credit limit!!!

 

TS are very pleasant and helpful to me, but as I was told today they (TS) have no case law to go on, therfore, it doesn't appear that they have prosecuted on an CCA S78 offence before? I offered up the Wilson v love case but wasn't sure if that case would be valid in my particular situation.

Anyhow, TS are still investigating for me, I also stated in the nicest possible manner, that I am extremely concerned re: the MS criminal offence and that I will be putting on some pressure for TS to prosecute.

I do know that TS have been communicating with MS about the MS 1983 reg view which TS does not appear to share.

 

Lastly, TS will be getting back to me next week after further investigations.

 

Love AC

 

ps I remebered to ask as to whether the CCA S78 breach is as I was formally advised a Criminal Offence...answer yes. Futher, I also enquired as what doc. the information comes from...answer it is in the TS notes and I will be advised as to which doc. next week

 

Well AC that is great news, thank you!

 

Will you do me a favour and PM me the info they give you re it being a criminal offence as soon as you get it? That way I call my dad and the other sergeant and let them know.

 

If it is a criminal offence then the Police HAVE to investigate it......

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Un1 - I'm giving up on whether it's "criminal" or "civil, what the difference is, what the penalties are etc. etc.

 

I'm giving up on S85 now Pam's put the spanner in the works:shock: :shock:

 

I'm NOT giving up alcohol or cigarettes.:shock: :shock: :shock:

 

And I wouldn't DREAM of giving up being nice to all my friends on here;)

 

And listen Corn I'm a "SARAH" - single, available, rich and happy.

(...well, ok, two out of four isn't bad)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Un1 - I'm giving up on whether it's "criminal" or "civil, what the difference is, what the penalties are etc. etc.

 

I'm giving up on S85 now Pam's put the spanner in the works:shock: :shock:

 

I'm NOT giving up alcohol or cigarettes.:shock:

 

And I wouldn't DREAM of giving up being nice to all my friends on here;)

 

And listen Corn I'm a "SARAH" - single, available, rich and happy.

(...well, ok, two out of four isn't bad)

 

LOL! Well listen here Bird, I'm a BITCH (babe in total control of herself).

 

That would be funny if it were true!!!!:rolleyes:

CLICK ON THE SCALES IF YOU THINK I HAVE HELPED!

 

I AM NOT SCARED ANYMORE!:rolleyes:

 

MBNA - To quote "The Carpenters", We've Only Just Begun..................;):D

HSBC - Settled.

Capital One - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Goldfish - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) issued.

Tesco - SAR issued.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Un1 - I'm giving up on whether it's "criminal" or "civil, what the difference is, what the penalties are etc. etc.

 

I'm giving up on S85 now Pam's put the spanner in the works:shock: :shock:

 

I'm NOT giving up alcohol or cigarettes.:shock: :shock: :shock:

 

And I wouldn't DREAM of giving up being nice to all my friends on here;)

 

And listen Corn I'm a "SARAH" - single, available, rich and happy.

(...well, ok, two out of four isn't bad)

 

Oh I see, well you should never give up on anything hun!!

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Battleaxe
Un1 - I'm giving up on whether it's "criminal" or "civil, what the difference is, what the penalties are etc. etc.

 

I'm giving up on S85 now Pam's put the spanner in the works:shock: :shock:

 

I'm NOT giving up alcohol or cigarettes.:shock: :shock: :shock:

 

And I wouldn't DREAM of giving up being nice to all my friends on here;)

 

And listen Corn I'm a "SARAH" - single, available, rich and happy.

(...well, ok, two out of four isn't bad)

 

 

Capital One jumped up and decided they had better refund the unlawful charges once I sent the then Section 85 defaults and threatend an injunction against them. They reckoned the generic mailer was all they had to send when sending out the replacement cards. MBNA are jumpy about this too. they have gone very quiet, so I am going ahead with my action regarding Section 85 and to add insult to injury I added CI to my claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
Un1 - I'm giving up on whether it's "criminal" or "civil, what the difference is, what the penalties are etc. etc.

 

I'm giving up on S85 now Pam's put the spanner in the works:shock: :shock:

 

I'm NOT giving up alcohol or cigarettes.:shock: :shock: :shock:

 

And I wouldn't DREAM of giving up being nice to all my friends on here;)

 

And listen Corn I'm a "SARAH" - single, available, rich and happy.

(...well, ok, two out of four isn't bad)

 

LB: You are not allowed to give up as it is not in your T&C.Im single,available and happy but am I giving up you bet I aint. Them sl-gs will have to put me in a box before that happens and the chances of them doing that are nil.So have a few bottles of wine a few packs of Marlboro and get yer arse back on here.The "witches" would never forgive you if you left the coven.

 

The Terminator has spoken

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
Hi

 

Okay, let's change the subject then - back to that other minefield known as s85! All those with headaches/hangovers look away now! :eek:

 

I have been itching to hit my CC providers with this potential 'default' under s85 but after looking at the relevant sections of the CCA, the 1983 regs and the CC documents I have in my possession again and again, I have now come to the conclusion that there is likely to be no mileage in this issue for many of us.

 

to recap - s85 states:

 

85 Duty on issue of new credit-tokens

 

(1) Whenever, in connection with a credit-token agreement, a credit-token (other than the first) is given by the creditor to the debtor, the creditor shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it.

 

(2) If the creditor fails to comply with this section—

 

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

 

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

The 1983(cancellation notices and copies of documents) regs. state in relation to this:

 

Copies of credit-token agreements where the agreement contains a power of variation

 

8. Every copy of an executed credit-token agreement given to the debtor under section 85(1) of the Act where the agreement may be varied under a power contained in it shall comprise an easily legible statement of the current terms of the agreement (whether or not varied in accordance with section 82( 1) of the Act).

 

We have debated what is meant by the choice of the word comprise and have found that one definition is 'include' which would fit with our preferred interpretation of what is required under s85.

 

BUT - Every other section of these regs. that contains a description of what a copy must contain or consist of, under the various different circumstances, uses the word INCLUDE!

 

Why would section 8 then use a different word (comprise) if it actually means include?

 

So, my conclusion is that for a copy under s85 the creditor is only obliged to sent a copy of the current terms of the agreement (whether or not varied) as per s8 of the regs.

 

This actually appears to be happening in many cases, with either a separate copy of the T&Cs being sent with the new CC or the current terms being printed on the actual 'mailer'.

 

I don't see why the CCA would insist on the creditor sending a copy of the whole original agreement anyway because there is no similar requirement to periodically remind you of your agreement for any other type of credit and I think that the only reason this 'copy' is required on the renewal of credit tokens is because the terms are almost always variable.

 

So, I personally will not be going down this route unless I find that one of my CC providers has not sent the 'copy' of T&Cs at all, in which case I will test the water.

 

I have my body armour in position now and am ready for the expected onslaught - so hit me with it!! :eek:

 

Regards, Pam

 

 

 

 

The regulations do not overide stature so you can now take off the body armour.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest The Terminator
As the Senior member of the Coven, I am not allowing Ladybird to backslide.

 

Agreed BA anyone who backslides(and you are the senior witch/member) gives you the authority to cast your spells on them that is with the exception of me because im a cyborg:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4972 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...