Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application  around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldnt drive- but i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially comitting an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all    
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf   p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct.   What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply.
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Northern Rock mortgage and secured loan.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3708 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am trying to sort out a possible PPI claim on behalf of my mother.

 

The short story:

 

She re mortgaged her property through NR some years ago to raise finance to start a business, after a while she wanted to re mortgage again to raise more capital for expansion. Instead of re mortgaging they set up a secured loan which my mother didn't realise at the time.

 

To cut a long story short, I have sent them a template letter recently requesting a copy of the credit agreement and the terms and conditions for both the mortgage and the secured loan using details from her latest statement. They have replied stating that the account is not a consumer credit act regulated loan because it is exempt in accordance with section 16 of the consumer credit act.

 

I have no idea what this means and have no idea how to pursue this now, any help would be appreciated.

 

 

Stu.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Posting here as I couldn't see a subforum for northern rock.

 

I'm asking on behalf of my mother regarding her mortgage which should be finished as of August 2013,

if any further information is required it may take a while to get it so please bear with me.

 

The mortgage was originally taken out a long time ago and the final payment was due next August,

during the loan period she remortgaged and took out a secured loan.

 

She specifically asked for the payments to be increased so that the mortgage would still only run for the same time as the original loan term.

 

This was agreed by northern rock and she has been paying the increased payments for the last 8-10 years, (can't remember exactly).

 

They have just decided to contact her to inform her that they originally miscalculated and the payments have to be increased by £110 per month and run for an additional 7 months after the original final payment date of August 2013!

 

She is understandably upset about this as she retired last November and she was looking forward to owning her home outright and having the extra cash, she arranged for this mortgage to be finished at this time as is would coincide with roughly the time she would retire within a few months.

 

I have advised her to at least complain as she would most likely have continued to work for another year or so if they had informed her of this miscalculation earlier and I believe it to be at the very least unprofessional for them to miscalculate the repayments and not realise until just before the end of the loan term.

 

Is there anything she can do about this other than send a strongly worded complaint?

Edited by sturose
Link to post
Share on other sites

She will need to start with the internal complaints procedures first. Once that is exhausted, and if she doesn't get the result she wants, she can complain to the Financial Ombudsman.

 

My thought is that maybe she could state that she had relied on their calculations to be accurate, thereby making her future financial planning secure. As they failed to do that accurately, she will suffer a detriment. She may need to see a solicitor and discuss the potential for a claim of estoppel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Do you have it in writing that Northern Rock miscalculated the payments ?

 

If you do, when complaining to the Financial Ombudsman Service, you should make reference to this

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/guidance/mtge_underfunding.htm

 

And make it clear that Northern Rock is to blame. You could even make reference to the above in your complaint to Northern Rock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Do you have it in writing that Northern Rock miscalculated the payments ?

 

If you do, when complaining to the Financial Ombudsman Service, you should make reference to this

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/guidance/mtge_underfunding.htm

 

And make it clear that Northern Rock is to blame. You could even make reference to the above in your complaint to Northern Rock.

 

I'm not altogether sure what was said in the letter but I believe it does mention that they have miscalculated the repayments. I will contact my mother to find out.

 

Thanks for that useful link, it explains quite a few possible scenarios. I will pass that information on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the letter does not confirm the mistake, another line or argument you could try is in regard to the payments and arrears.

 

If the monthly payments are made by direct debit, you can argue that Northern Rock controls the amount taken each month and if there have been no letters regarding arrears, your Mum had no reason to question the amount paid each month.

 

There was a big story about a lender a year or two ago now, I think it was the Leeds that tried this on mass with their borrowers, hence why the FOS published its guidance.

 

I hope it all works out for your Mum

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I did have a thread here previously which I started a couple of months ago, it seems to have vanished along with other peoples threads as I have been reading. If and when the thread is found can the mods please merge with this one. Thanks.

 

Fortunately I had posted the original question elsewhere so I will post here and hopefully it will jog somebodys memory.

 

I'm asking on behalf of my mother regarding her mortgage which should be finished as of August 2013, if any further information is required it may take a while to get it so please bear with me.

 

The mortgage was originally taken out a long time ago and the final payment was due next August, during the loan period she remortgaged and took out a secured loan.

 

She specifically asked for the payments to be increased so that the mortgage would still only run for the same time as the original loan term.

 

This was agreed by northern rock and she has been paying the increased payments for the last 8-10 years, (can't remember exactly).

 

They have just decided to contact her to inform her that they originally miscalculated and the payments have to be increased by £110 per month and run for an additional 7 months after the original final payment date of August 2013!

 

She is understandably upset about this as she retired last November and she was looking forward to owning her home outright and having the extra cash, she arranged for this mortgage to be finished at this time as is would coincide with roughly the time she would retire within a few months.

 

I have advised her to at least complain as she would most likely have continued to work for another year or so if they had informed her of this miscalculation earlier and I believe it to be at the very least unprofessional for them to miscalculate the repayments and not realise until just before the end of the loan term.

 

If it was just a couple of pounds increase and no extra payments then fair enough but this is rather a large mistake in my opinion, the extra £110 per month over the new term they have calculated is an extra £2k+ not taking into account the extra 7 months of the current payments she is making!! In total she will be paying over £5k extra on top of what was originally calculated.

 

Is there anything she can do about this other than send a strongly worded complaint?

 

My mother has now had a response to her complaint, I personally don't believe that the response offers any explanation whatsoever but Nram have stated that this is their final response to the complaint.

 

The letter she has received simply outlines her original complaint points then continues to summarise with the following:

 

Your mortgage with nram commenced on xxxxxxxxx (date). You initially borrowed £xxxxxx over 10 years.

 

On xxxxxxxxx (Date), you borrowed a further£xxxx.xx and were offered a fixed rate deal of 4.89% over 7 years, your mortgage term remained unchanged at 10 years from commencement.

 

On 15th August 2012 on 12 July 2012 (copied exactly as printed on the letter???) we wrote to you and confirmed that the increase in monthly payments following expiry of your fixed rate period was due to the outstanding fees that were added to your mortgage balance on completion but had not yet been repaid.

 

The dates and the amounts on the first two lines are irrelevant and have therefore been blanked out but they are stating that the increase has something to do with fees that they have informed my mother about. I have the letter that they state they sent on 15th August 2012 in front of me and nowhere does it mention fees that have yet to be paid.

 

Along with the letter they have also sent a copy of the original application form my mother used to apply for the mortgage, thye only fees mentioned on this form are valuation/administration fees which were paid by credit card at the time of the application. No other fees are mentioned.

 

They have stated that the fixed rate deal of 4.89% ended and the standard variable rate will apply to both the mortgage and the secured loan. The new rate as of 1st September 2012 was 4.54%!!!

 

Correct me if I am wrong as I am no mathematician but wouldn't a decrease in interest rate usually mean a decrease in monthly payment amount???

 

They have still to explain what these "fees" are as I have been through the paperwork thoroughly and I can find no mention of any fees needing to be added to the balance, but they have stated that this will be their final response!

 

I realise that it can be difficult to assess the situation without seeing the paperwork, I don't want to post too much publicly as its not my information to post but if there is anyone here who thinks they may be able to help I will gladly scan and PM copies of the paperwork as this is really starting to stress my mother out.

 

Sorry for the long post and I will be grateful for any help with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, posting here now my original thread has been found. The other thread I started can be deleted.

 

 

 

 

My mother has now had a response to her complaint, I personally don't believe that the response offers any explanation whatsoever but Nram have stated that this is their final response to the complaint.

 

The letter she has received simply outlines her original complaint points then continues to summarise with the following:

 

 

 

Your mortgage with nram commenced on xxxxxxxxx (date). You initially borrowed £xxxxxx over 10 years.

 

On xxxxxxxxx (Date), you borrowed a further£xxxx.xx and were offered a fixed rate deal of 4.89% over 7 years, your mortgage term remained unchanged at 10 years from commencement.

 

On 15th August 2012 on 12 July 2012 (copied exactly as printed on the letter???) we wrote to you and confirmed that the increase in monthly payments following expiry of your fixed rate period was due to the outstanding fees that were added to your mortgage balance on completion but had not yet been repaid.

 

 

The dates and the amounts on the first two lines are irrelevant and have therefore been blanked out but they are stating that the increase has something to do with fees that they have informed my mother about. I have the letter that they state they sent on 15th August 2012 in front of me and nowhere does it mention fees that have yet to be paid.

 

Along with the letter they have also sent a copy of the original application form my mother used to apply for the mortgage, thye only fees mentioned on this form are valuation/administration fees which were paid by credit card at the time of the application. No other fees are mentioned.

 

They have stated that the fixed rate deal of 4.89% ended and the standard variable rate will apply to both the mortgage and the secured loan. The new rate as of 1st September 2012 was 4.54%!!!

 

Correct me if I am wrong as I am no mathematician but wouldn't a decrease in interestlink3.gif rate usually mean a decrease in monthly payment amount???

 

They have still to explain what these "fees" are as I have been through the paperwork thoroughly and I can find no mention of any fees needing to be added to the balance, but they have stated that this will be their final response!

 

I realise that it can be difficult to assess the situation without seeing the paperwork, I don't want to post too much publicly as its not my information to post but if there is anyone here who thinks they may be able to help I will gladly scan and PM copies of the paperwork as this is really starting to stress my mother out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I thought I would come back and give you guys an update.

 

We decided to take the matter further and contact the ombudsman. After giving them all the details they then had to wait several months for NRam to submit the information about the mortgage account.

 

They found in favour of NRam!!

 

I wasn't taking this lying down, I encouraged my mother to push for the matter to be taken further because what they had stated to my mother and what they told FOS where in my opinion substantially different. They reviewed the case again, looked into it a little deeper and found that NRam had given misleading information (intentionally or not) and they were ordered to pay compensation. They were also ordered to recalculate the mortgage based on the new information from the time the property was remortgaged and refund any overpayment.

 

Result: Nearly £600 refunded. Not the biggest sum in the world but a substantial amount for a pensioner, also if they had done this to just a small percentage of people who had mortgages with them how much extra would they be raking in that people do not challenge. My mother was all but ready to quit as she felt she did not have the strength to keep fighting but it paid off.

 

Thanks for the help and advice guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...