Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Standard form being sent to large numbers of claimants. Just answer as the form asks.  No need to  go into any detail, unless the forms asks for specific details of how health impacts on daily activities. If you are worried contact Citizens Advice as they are experts with PIP, as they are trained to understand what evidence is required for assessments.
    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Northern Rock mortgage and secured loan.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3707 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am trying to sort out a possible PPI claim on behalf of my mother.

 

The short story:

 

She re mortgaged her property through NR some years ago to raise finance to start a business, after a while she wanted to re mortgage again to raise more capital for expansion. Instead of re mortgaging they set up a secured loan which my mother didn't realise at the time.

 

To cut a long story short, I have sent them a template letter recently requesting a copy of the credit agreement and the terms and conditions for both the mortgage and the secured loan using details from her latest statement. They have replied stating that the account is not a consumer credit act regulated loan because it is exempt in accordance with section 16 of the consumer credit act.

 

I have no idea what this means and have no idea how to pursue this now, any help would be appreciated.

 

 

Stu.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Posting here as I couldn't see a subforum for northern rock.

 

I'm asking on behalf of my mother regarding her mortgage which should be finished as of August 2013,

if any further information is required it may take a while to get it so please bear with me.

 

The mortgage was originally taken out a long time ago and the final payment was due next August,

during the loan period she remortgaged and took out a secured loan.

 

She specifically asked for the payments to be increased so that the mortgage would still only run for the same time as the original loan term.

 

This was agreed by northern rock and she has been paying the increased payments for the last 8-10 years, (can't remember exactly).

 

They have just decided to contact her to inform her that they originally miscalculated and the payments have to be increased by £110 per month and run for an additional 7 months after the original final payment date of August 2013!

 

She is understandably upset about this as she retired last November and she was looking forward to owning her home outright and having the extra cash, she arranged for this mortgage to be finished at this time as is would coincide with roughly the time she would retire within a few months.

 

I have advised her to at least complain as she would most likely have continued to work for another year or so if they had informed her of this miscalculation earlier and I believe it to be at the very least unprofessional for them to miscalculate the repayments and not realise until just before the end of the loan term.

 

Is there anything she can do about this other than send a strongly worded complaint?

Edited by sturose
Link to post
Share on other sites

She will need to start with the internal complaints procedures first. Once that is exhausted, and if she doesn't get the result she wants, she can complain to the Financial Ombudsman.

 

My thought is that maybe she could state that she had relied on their calculations to be accurate, thereby making her future financial planning secure. As they failed to do that accurately, she will suffer a detriment. She may need to see a solicitor and discuss the potential for a claim of estoppel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Do you have it in writing that Northern Rock miscalculated the payments ?

 

If you do, when complaining to the Financial Ombudsman Service, you should make reference to this

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/guidance/mtge_underfunding.htm

 

And make it clear that Northern Rock is to blame. You could even make reference to the above in your complaint to Northern Rock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Do you have it in writing that Northern Rock miscalculated the payments ?

 

If you do, when complaining to the Financial Ombudsman Service, you should make reference to this

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/guidance/mtge_underfunding.htm

 

And make it clear that Northern Rock is to blame. You could even make reference to the above in your complaint to Northern Rock.

 

I'm not altogether sure what was said in the letter but I believe it does mention that they have miscalculated the repayments. I will contact my mother to find out.

 

Thanks for that useful link, it explains quite a few possible scenarios. I will pass that information on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the letter does not confirm the mistake, another line or argument you could try is in regard to the payments and arrears.

 

If the monthly payments are made by direct debit, you can argue that Northern Rock controls the amount taken each month and if there have been no letters regarding arrears, your Mum had no reason to question the amount paid each month.

 

There was a big story about a lender a year or two ago now, I think it was the Leeds that tried this on mass with their borrowers, hence why the FOS published its guidance.

 

I hope it all works out for your Mum

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I did have a thread here previously which I started a couple of months ago, it seems to have vanished along with other peoples threads as I have been reading. If and when the thread is found can the mods please merge with this one. Thanks.

 

Fortunately I had posted the original question elsewhere so I will post here and hopefully it will jog somebodys memory.

 

I'm asking on behalf of my mother regarding her mortgage which should be finished as of August 2013, if any further information is required it may take a while to get it so please bear with me.

 

The mortgage was originally taken out a long time ago and the final payment was due next August, during the loan period she remortgaged and took out a secured loan.

 

She specifically asked for the payments to be increased so that the mortgage would still only run for the same time as the original loan term.

 

This was agreed by northern rock and she has been paying the increased payments for the last 8-10 years, (can't remember exactly).

 

They have just decided to contact her to inform her that they originally miscalculated and the payments have to be increased by £110 per month and run for an additional 7 months after the original final payment date of August 2013!

 

She is understandably upset about this as she retired last November and she was looking forward to owning her home outright and having the extra cash, she arranged for this mortgage to be finished at this time as is would coincide with roughly the time she would retire within a few months.

 

I have advised her to at least complain as she would most likely have continued to work for another year or so if they had informed her of this miscalculation earlier and I believe it to be at the very least unprofessional for them to miscalculate the repayments and not realise until just before the end of the loan term.

 

If it was just a couple of pounds increase and no extra payments then fair enough but this is rather a large mistake in my opinion, the extra £110 per month over the new term they have calculated is an extra £2k+ not taking into account the extra 7 months of the current payments she is making!! In total she will be paying over £5k extra on top of what was originally calculated.

 

Is there anything she can do about this other than send a strongly worded complaint?

 

My mother has now had a response to her complaint, I personally don't believe that the response offers any explanation whatsoever but Nram have stated that this is their final response to the complaint.

 

The letter she has received simply outlines her original complaint points then continues to summarise with the following:

 

Your mortgage with nram commenced on xxxxxxxxx (date). You initially borrowed £xxxxxx over 10 years.

 

On xxxxxxxxx (Date), you borrowed a further£xxxx.xx and were offered a fixed rate deal of 4.89% over 7 years, your mortgage term remained unchanged at 10 years from commencement.

 

On 15th August 2012 on 12 July 2012 (copied exactly as printed on the letter???) we wrote to you and confirmed that the increase in monthly payments following expiry of your fixed rate period was due to the outstanding fees that were added to your mortgage balance on completion but had not yet been repaid.

 

The dates and the amounts on the first two lines are irrelevant and have therefore been blanked out but they are stating that the increase has something to do with fees that they have informed my mother about. I have the letter that they state they sent on 15th August 2012 in front of me and nowhere does it mention fees that have yet to be paid.

 

Along with the letter they have also sent a copy of the original application form my mother used to apply for the mortgage, thye only fees mentioned on this form are valuation/administration fees which were paid by credit card at the time of the application. No other fees are mentioned.

 

They have stated that the fixed rate deal of 4.89% ended and the standard variable rate will apply to both the mortgage and the secured loan. The new rate as of 1st September 2012 was 4.54%!!!

 

Correct me if I am wrong as I am no mathematician but wouldn't a decrease in interest rate usually mean a decrease in monthly payment amount???

 

They have still to explain what these "fees" are as I have been through the paperwork thoroughly and I can find no mention of any fees needing to be added to the balance, but they have stated that this will be their final response!

 

I realise that it can be difficult to assess the situation without seeing the paperwork, I don't want to post too much publicly as its not my information to post but if there is anyone here who thinks they may be able to help I will gladly scan and PM copies of the paperwork as this is really starting to stress my mother out.

 

Sorry for the long post and I will be grateful for any help with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, posting here now my original thread has been found. The other thread I started can be deleted.

 

 

 

 

My mother has now had a response to her complaint, I personally don't believe that the response offers any explanation whatsoever but Nram have stated that this is their final response to the complaint.

 

The letter she has received simply outlines her original complaint points then continues to summarise with the following:

 

 

 

Your mortgage with nram commenced on xxxxxxxxx (date). You initially borrowed £xxxxxx over 10 years.

 

On xxxxxxxxx (Date), you borrowed a further£xxxx.xx and were offered a fixed rate deal of 4.89% over 7 years, your mortgage term remained unchanged at 10 years from commencement.

 

On 15th August 2012 on 12 July 2012 (copied exactly as printed on the letter???) we wrote to you and confirmed that the increase in monthly payments following expiry of your fixed rate period was due to the outstanding fees that were added to your mortgage balance on completion but had not yet been repaid.

 

 

The dates and the amounts on the first two lines are irrelevant and have therefore been blanked out but they are stating that the increase has something to do with fees that they have informed my mother about. I have the letter that they state they sent on 15th August 2012 in front of me and nowhere does it mention fees that have yet to be paid.

 

Along with the letter they have also sent a copy of the original application form my mother used to apply for the mortgage, thye only fees mentioned on this form are valuation/administration fees which were paid by credit card at the time of the application. No other fees are mentioned.

 

They have stated that the fixed rate deal of 4.89% ended and the standard variable rate will apply to both the mortgage and the secured loan. The new rate as of 1st September 2012 was 4.54%!!!

 

Correct me if I am wrong as I am no mathematician but wouldn't a decrease in interestlink3.gif rate usually mean a decrease in monthly payment amount???

 

They have still to explain what these "fees" are as I have been through the paperwork thoroughly and I can find no mention of any fees needing to be added to the balance, but they have stated that this will be their final response!

 

I realise that it can be difficult to assess the situation without seeing the paperwork, I don't want to post too much publicly as its not my information to post but if there is anyone here who thinks they may be able to help I will gladly scan and PM copies of the paperwork as this is really starting to stress my mother out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I thought I would come back and give you guys an update.

 

We decided to take the matter further and contact the ombudsman. After giving them all the details they then had to wait several months for NRam to submit the information about the mortgage account.

 

They found in favour of NRam!!

 

I wasn't taking this lying down, I encouraged my mother to push for the matter to be taken further because what they had stated to my mother and what they told FOS where in my opinion substantially different. They reviewed the case again, looked into it a little deeper and found that NRam had given misleading information (intentionally or not) and they were ordered to pay compensation. They were also ordered to recalculate the mortgage based on the new information from the time the property was remortgaged and refund any overpayment.

 

Result: Nearly £600 refunded. Not the biggest sum in the world but a substantial amount for a pensioner, also if they had done this to just a small percentage of people who had mortgages with them how much extra would they be raking in that people do not challenge. My mother was all but ready to quit as she felt she did not have the strength to keep fighting but it paid off.

 

Thanks for the help and advice guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...