Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All. I was driving in Stevenage down a 40 road.  After coming off the motor way i noticed my car felt a little "weird" so i accelerated, then slowed the car down.  Shortly after i got stopped by a manned police car with a laser. During the stop the officer stated i was doing 54 in a 40, the conversation was short, but he said i would unlikely get a awareness course and it was most likely 3 points and a fine.  Mrs thought it was a good idea to have dairy when she is lactose intollerant on date night, so we just got on our way.  At the time, i didnt admit to the offence, but did say i didnt realise and had slowed down in any case. The officers chest camera was recording and on. At the stop, he asked where to send the fine to, as i knew i would be travelling to visit family up north, i provided my temporary details at that location in Yorkshire. It is now 05/05 and i havent recieved anything at either my home address in Stevenage or the temporary address. 1. Is there a time limit in which paperwork needs to be sent to me. 2. SHould i query the ticket as i dont want to miss any deadlines (if so who do i check with?) OR should i keep queit. 3. Given nothing has arrived in 20 days, is there a chance of appeal if and when it comes through? Many thanks CrazeUK
    • Hi All. A family friends car was having issues when she was on a trip visiting family up north at the begining of January.  She ended up leaving it at my friends garage in the same location, who parked it on his forecourt to investigate the issue, howver he said most likely it is beyond economical repair as its a serious gearbox fault. In the meantime i replaced her car with one of my spare cars. The insurance on the car then expired in at the end of January.  When the insurance expired, I sent a paper V890 paper as i didnt have her V5 Reference number in hand to do it online (i have a copy of this).  She didnt mention she hadnt recieved any confirmation as she didnt know if she would get one.  She then cancelled her road tax at the end of March (i think) as she was paying by DD. She then was travelling up north so didnt get her ,ail until last week. She recievd a letter dated 09/04/2024 stating she had failed to insure the vehcile and there was a £100 fine which could be reduced to £50 if she respons by 11/05/2024.  As soon as we noticed, i got her to dig  out the V5 and SORN'd the vehicle.   My friend has been a bit slow in checking the fault, however i suspect it will still be scrapped and is still on his forecourt. Is this possible to appeal?
    • worthy to not forget Just to let you know this bunch Kensington have been fined £1.225m by the financial regulator for treating borrowers who were in arrears unfairly. Claim those charges back plus the interest and tell them not to add any more to the account. There are a few news stories here you can get the info for a letter to send to them. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/8615870.stm  
    • Hi All. I went to visit a family friend in Rochdale on a new housing estate opposite a old row of houses. The location is Royle Road, Postcode OL11 3PE. I was originally parked in parking bays outside the old houses, then moved the car, when I noticed my tyre was flat, so parked on what looked like double yellows to use his air pump to check and inflate the tyres before we left the house.   In the time i went inside to sort the pump and power supply i got a PCN.  The tyre then got changed (has a puncture) and we left. PCN Number:         RE######## Date:             04/05/2024 Time:             20:36 Observation:         20:34 to 20:36 Reported location:     Royle Park Road Reason:        Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (Code: 01) I believe this PCN is not correct and has grounds to appeal: 1. My friend who moved into the property around 6 months ago, swears that even though it has old double yellows marked, they are not current or council marked.   He said the property development company had said they had marked them for ease of access during development. 2. The road i was parked on was Royle Road.  The PCN was issued for Royle Park Road, which is about 400 yards up the road. 3. There are no sign posts or marking showing parking  restriction hours in the entire area (there maybe on Royle park Road). I have attached a map of the Location where i parked as a red dot. I have 2 questions: a.  Is there a way to check where double yellow lines are marked on some register to check if they are current? b. Can my grounds of appeal simply be, wrong location, wrong offence? Thanks in advance. Map_20240505.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Statute Barred Debts?? Natwest CC


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4584 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I have a Natwest credit card debt which i defaulted on 6/10/05, i have had various DCA chase it up but i CCA'd natwest some years ago and they never produced, i just keep informing the new DCA of this and ignore.

 

Its been about 2 years since i heard anything at all, but am i right in thinking that as the debt was defaulted 6 yearts ago today that it is Statute Barred?

 

I made 1 payment to a DCA very early in 2006 before i knew my rights, does that hamper the SB route if someone was to contact me or do i ask them to prove that i made a payment?

 

Any advice is welcome.

 

Olliepup.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sb runs basically from YOUR last financial transaction

 

do this show on your CRA file?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI dx,

 

CRA file? is this credit file? I'm with Credit Expert and i don't think the history goes back that far?

 

This debt has been passed from pillar to post, first DCA that chased it and i made one payment was Triton, since then it's been round loads.

 

So not sure if payment could be traced?

 

So if anyone was to contact me would it be worth saying this debt is 6 years old so SB unless they can prove otherwise?

 

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if its not on your CRA file it IS SB'ed

6yrs is the limit under statute of limitations law.

 

end off

 

forget them.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry dx, yes the card debt is on the file but they only show last 2 years of payments or zeros in my case.

 

Is that what you meant?

 

I do have a Natwest loan that had a full agreement which i'm paying to Irwin Mitchell solicitors but that debt is not registered on my Credit file at all??

Link to post
Share on other sites

then why are you paying it?

 

something fishy there then....

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

 

i have been paying the Natwest loan as they had an agreement which looked ok and were threatening court, anyway there is no record of the debt on the CRA so does that make it un enforceable?

 

I'm hoping to not hear from anyone again re the Credit card debt which hopefully is Statute barred.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

as in post 4

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so thats two you are not paying now?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i have payed another month of irwin mitchell , they have an agreement but threatened court action, but the account is not on file, so don't know how the courts would view that?

 

If you have been paying debts that are online do they remain on CRA after 6 years? as i have old car finance that had always been paid but now finished and just says satifactory.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'm really puzzled why you are paying debts that do not show on your CRA file

an 'agreement' means nothing if the debt is SB'ed .

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A live account will stay on file

as long as it is in use and reported

on by the creditor in most cases,

however a defaulted account inactive

will be remove automatically paid or

not, a ''paid up'' account showing

as satisfactory will usually be removed

after 6 years, CIFAS & Gain may

remain longer.

 

Brig.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for the info guys.

 

Dx im prob confusing things, ive never paid the natwest one which is now SB and gone off file, but i have a natwest loan which had an agreement and was threatened with court but that account is not on CRA file.

 

I have quite a few satifactory things on there now and the 2 biggest debts i had have been removed now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brig,

 

The Natwest loan i had is about 5 years old but i have been paying it monthly, there is a loan agreement but this loan is not on the CRA.

 

The natwest credit card has just turned 6 years old, no CCA so have only made one payment first month after default, but since turning 6 years old it has now been removed from CRA.

 

Things is would a court make you pay a debt with an agreement even though its not on CRA file?

 

Cheers olliepuip

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brig,

 

The Natwest loan i had is about 5 years old but i have been paying it monthly, there is a loan agreement but this loan is not on the CRA.

 

The natwest credit card has just turned 6 years old, no CCA so have only made one payment first month after default, but since turning 6 years old it has now been removed from CRA.

 

Things is would a court make you pay a debt with an agreement even though its not on CRA file?

 

Cheers olliepuip

There have to very pressing reasons for a creditor to attempt to

enforce a SB debt through the court and I doubt they would succeed

any and the costs would be high.

 

BRIG

Link to post
Share on other sites

on the loan...

could there have been a period of 6yrs where by you paid nowt?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the loan i have been paying it last two years regular, and had made token payments previous, that was to natwest but the last two years have been to Irwin Mitchell solicitors, They said it would be good to pay it as it's not on my file so i could get rid of the debt without harming my CRA.

 

The loan has never ever been on my CRA as i've subsribed to Credit Expert as long as i've been having trouble to keep an eye on things, initially got it as my bank said there was a massive debt on my file, it was my old mortgage as well as my current one.

 

I don't think the loan is SB as i have been paying it, puzzles me why it's never been on my file in the first place?

 

I had a big loan with first direct, i CCA them and when they couldn't follow up my request they took it off my file straight away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

mitchells are NW pet solicitors anyhow......

 

ok well if its never been on your cra p'haps they never wanted anyone to see how they've stitched you up.

 

ok lave things there then..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wonder if its worth challenging them on it?

 

I.e stop paying and see what happens and state its not on my file so i dont owe it?

 

They can't enter it on my file at this late stage?

 

Cheers for input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no they cant

but we are talking about a serious sum outstanding here going by post 21

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The loan i am paying to IM has about 2 k left or just under.

 

The old mortgage debt was fully satisfied as the mortgage was settled, but was amazed to see it still on my file but being maintained as satisfied even when it was no longer active and i still got my current mortgage.

 

I spoke to Credit expert and they removed the old mortgage.

 

So total debt has been reduced from 31k total to about 6k on my file now with some final settlements and invalid CCA, mind i'm only paying the IM mitchell one which is around 2k and the egg banking which amounts to about 1800 quid, the others still havent produced CCA yet.

 

So i wonder if IM would pursue about 2k through the courts?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...