Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Starting my journey now


hannanshah
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6532 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Last August I sent a cheque to Capital One to pay off my credit card bill. Unfortunately there wasn't enough money in my Halifax account because a Direct Debit had gone through the day before.

 

On my Capital One statement the receipt of this payment is acknowledged (August 8th). However, 8 days later it mentions a payment reversal together with a return cheque fee of £20 and a late payment fee of £20 (as well as the mention of this late payment on my credit record).

 

Halifax charged me £39 (I was a sent a letter dated on the 9th to confirm this). On my Halifax statement there is no mention of me going into an overdraft (as in a payment being sent to Capital Once) and the £39 charge was taken on August 16th.

 

From Halifax's side it seems as though they never sent any money to Capital One and simply applied a £39 charge on my balance on the 16th. However, on my Capital One statement it says I paid in £138.20 on August 8th but then the payment reversal and charges are applied on the 16th.

 

Is there something fishy going on here? I am planning to claim my charges back but can I get the late payment removed from my credit record?

 

Also, if I want to claim back interest on the charges Capital One made do I simply mention the 8% figure from the spreadsheet? I was under the impression that this was only for use if the case went to a County Court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is something to do with payment processing times. they've got your cheque and asked your bank to pay. In the mean time (whilst waiting for your bank to pay) they credit your account with the payment. When you bank eventually tells them they won't pay it, they need to reverse the amount they credited.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have taken the draft of the preliminary letter and have edited it. I have been a bit cheeky to request that the cost of posting the letter be included in any settlement! Do you think the letter is fine? I plan on using this letter for my action against Barclaycard and Halifax too. My changes to the letter are in bold.

 

[my address]

 

Legal Compliance Specialist

Capital One Bank (Europe) plc

Trent House

Station street

Nottingham

NG2 3HX

 

Request for repayment of charges

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

My request

I am writing to ask you to refund to me the charges which you have levied from my account over the past year.

I now understand that the regime of fees which you have been applying to my account in relation to direct debit refusals, exceeding overdraft limits and so forth are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

Your responsibilities

I would draw your attention to the terms of the contract which you agreed to at the time that I opened my account. It is an implied term of that contract that you would conduct yourselves lawfully and in a manner which complies with UK law.

 

I am frankly shocked that you have operated my account in this way as I had always reposed confidence in your integrity and expertise as my fiduciary.

 

What I require

I calculate that you have taken £xxx plus interest. I require full payment of this sum including any interest that I was charged as a result of these illegal charges.

 

I also request that you compensate me for any costs that I have incurred as a result of your illegal charges. To date the only cost I have incurred is the cost of posting this letter to you and this is specified by the Royal Mail postage stamps on the envelope that contained this letter.

 

My targets to resolve this matter

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you will prefer to do this than merely respond with standard letters and leaflets.

 

I will give you 14 days to reply to me accepting unconditionally my request in principle and letting me know a date by which I will receive payment.

 

If you do not respond or you do not respond positively within this time period, I shall send you a letter before action giving you a further 14 days in which to reflect. I believe that these targets are more than sufficient for a large company such as yours with dedicated staff and departments.

 

After that will be no further communication from me and I shall issue a claim at the expiry of the second deadline.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

 

 

Hannan Shah

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Okay just got a reply from Capital One to my preliminary approach on the day of the deadline. They have confirmed that they will refund £40 and checking online shows that this was done on April 26! However, I have been charged £60 in fees and I also asked for interest and costs (ie. postage fees!).

 

I assume I now have to right back with a letter before action asking for the remaning £20, interest and costs. The only thing I really expect out of them is the remaining £20. I will then be ready to pursue the interest and costs in court. It'll be hilarious taking them to court for just a few pounds!

 

I was refunded an overlimit fee and a late payment fee but not a cheque return fee (from the same day as the late payment fee).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze

Interest? You cannot claim the interest till court, and if they have paid in full (after the £20), you cannot claim full stop, and in that case you havent had any costs!

 

 

Re-read, saw you want to clim postage? A judge is hardly gonig to be happy if you take it to court on that im afraid, you wont have anything of substance to claim on...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interest? You cannot claim the interest till court, and if they have paid in full (after the £20), you cannot claim full stop, and in that case you havent had any costs!

 

Well sending letters costs money and I made that clear in my preliminary approach. Also, I'm not talking about the 8%APR. I'm talking about the credit card interest as a result of the charges (ie. charges meant I had to pay more in interest!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze

But this will be a pittance yes?

 

If the charges are £60 owing and they charged interest at 30 % that would be £18 perhaps as a very upper limit?

 

So if you went to court asking the judge for £18 plus £2.00 postage (just a rought est.)

 

Even though they have paid the £60 back (thats of course saying they will pay the other £20)

 

Im not sure a judge would look kindly on you asking for this, and then expecting The bank to pay court costs of £30 and andother 8% interest on that....

 

Im just very very unsure you would win let alone the hassle for that amount?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have worked out that in 7 months there have been over 500 taken in charges from capital one on my account, I am now waiting for my statements for the last 2 years from them to be sent to me so I can send my initial letter asking for what sounds to be £000's from them for what they have taken illegally!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I undertand right, you still have 1 x £20 charge to reclaim, yes?

 

If that is the case, and if you have to issue a claim, then you should definitely claim that, charges interest if you can work it out, and 8% APR.

 

HOWEVER: If they pay you back the remaining £20 before you issue a court claim, you really need to look at your options before proceeding. A judge will not look kindly upon a claim that could be deemed frivolous, and attempting to reclaim a very low sum could well be construed as such. Don't forget that in such case, the judge could decide to award costs to the other side. So trying to claim a couple of pounds for stationery could end up a costly mistake... for you.

 

I'm concerned that you find taking a multi-national to court over a few pounds "hilarious". It might be a good idea to set the hilarity aside for one moment, and seriously consider your next steps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I undertand right, you still have 1 x £20 charge to reclaim, yes?

 

If that is the case, and if you have to issue a claim, then you should definitely claim that, charges interest if you can work it out, and 8% APR.

 

HOWEVER: If they pay you back the remaining £20 before you issue a court claim, you really need to look at your options before proceeding. A judge will not look kindly upon a claim that could be deemed frivolous, and attempting to reclaim a very low sum could well be construed as such. Don't forget that in such case, the judge could decide to award costs to the other side. So trying to claim a couple of pounds for stationery could end up a costly mistake... for you.

 

I'm concerned that you find taking a multi-national to court over a few pounds "hilarious". It might be a good idea to set the hilarity aside for one moment, and seriously consider your next steps.

 

Hey it was just a thought! I will obviously be more than happy to close the matter if I get all my charges back. What I really want to see is someone take one of those non-existant entities that work for Halifax to court?

 

I've sent my letter before action asking for the £20 plus any interest I've been charged. On a side note, Halifax just back back a £39 charge after my preliminary letter to them. Almost seems a bit too easy.

 

 

 

Merged threads, please keep to the same one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Okay it's past the 14 days now and I have had no reply to my LBA. I guess I should now head for Money Claim.

 

I'm still a bit confused about the interest stuff. I guess I use the spreadsheet but so I add the interest they charged me and then 8% on top of everything or do I just add the 8% to the charges? Also how do how work out exactly how much interest I had to pay as a result of the three charges?

 

Also on Moneyclaim do I sue using the Capital One Bank address? Finally what happens if I start the claim and I then receive a letter say tomorrow offering a refund (ie. I start the claim just as they are responding to my LBA)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Come on guys I need some help here!

 

What address do I use to sue Capital One?

 

Also the Particulars of Claim in the Library section is well above the 1080 character limit on the MoneyClaim form (around 1700 charcters). How do I trim this down? Do I need to mention the specific charges in this section?

 

Also I have been refunded £40 of the £60 I am owed which means I am claiming £20 plus interest at 8%. Can I claim interest on the other £40?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just submitted the following Particulars of claim through the Moneyclaim site. Tough meeting the less than 24 line limit (ended up around a 1000 characters):

 

The Claimant has an account xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

(‘the Account’) with the Defendant which was

opened around 2004. During the period in

which the Account has been operating the

Defendant debited numerous charges to the

Account in respect of purported breaches of

contract on the part of the Claimant. The

Claimant understands that the Defendant

contends that the charges were debited in

accordance with the terms of the contract

between itself and the Claimant. The

Claimant contends that the contractual

provision that permits the Defendant to levy

such charges is unenforceable by virtue of

the Unfair Contract Terms in Consumer

Contracts Regulations (1999), the Unfair

Contract Terms Act 1977 and the common law.

The Claimant claims the return of the amounts

debited in respect of charges in the sum of

£20; Court costs; Interest under section 69

of the County Courts Act at such rate and for

such periods as the court deems just. The

Claimant has asked the Defendant to justify

their charges but they have declined.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just got a letter from Capital One which says they don't admit liability but as a goodwill gesture are offering me £50 (£20 fee + £30 court costs). The letter says that if I don't want charges applied in the future then I should ask them to close my account.

 

However, on the form that needs to be signed, I have to confirm whether I want my account closed but there is no mention of me agreeing to future charges. Either way it doesn't matter as I'm pretty careful these days about going over my limit.

 

Case settled before court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Capital One letter says I need to inform the court of the agreed settlement.

 

Do I phone them, write to them or can I do it online?

 

When I go online the only options are to ask for judgment (not needed in this case) or that the defendant as admitted that all the money is owed (well I never got a court admission form from them and they aren't offering the interest I claimed so I don't think I can use this option either).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent back the settlement form and entered judgment online saying the defendant has offered to pay. Checked online to see that they gave the refund with costs yesterday to my account. Capital One and Halifax sorted. Currently in litigation vs the stubborn Barclaycard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/07/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6532 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...