Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. Anyway I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

RTI GAP Insurance advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4636 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

In February this year my parents decided to purchase a used car from Madeley Heath Motors in Stoke-on-Trent as the car we then owned was costing a fortune in repairs. The car in question was a second car that was insured for everyone in the household to drive; so for example i used the car for social use whilst either one of my parents used it for commuting. The new car that was purchased was to be used in the same fashion. However when purchasing the car I was given the opportunity by my parents to pay for the car instead of paying my £40 a week board in the hope that this would allow me to start building a credit history. At the time of purchase I was offered RTI GAP insurance which I was told would cover any driver named on the insurance policy against a total loss; so i purchased it.

 

The problem I have is that the vehicle was recently subject to a total loss and Admiral insurance company have made a settlement offer of £9500. The amount I owe on the finance is around £10000 and original invoice price of the car was around £11500. Upon looking at my GAP insurance policy so that i can make a claim I have noticed that a claim can only be made if the GAP insurance policy holder is also the registered keeper of the vehicle; which I am not. My mother is the registered owner of both cars in our household so that they can be insured on her Admiral multicar policy.

 

At the time of purchase i was not made aware of this requirement and I am now surely not going to covered for the shortfall between the amount offered to me for the car and the amount I still owe to the finance company.

 

Any advise as to how I should approach this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

In February this year my parents decided to purchase a used car from Madeley Heath Motors in Stoke-on-Trent as the car we then owned was costing a fortune in repairs. The car in question was a second car that was insured for everyone in the household to drive; so for example i used the car for social use whilst either one of my parents used it for commuting. The new car that was purchased was to be used in the same fashion. However when purchasing the car I was given the opportunity by my parents to pay for the car instead of paying my £40 a week board in the hope that this would allow me to start building a credit history. At the time of purchase I was offered RTI GAP insurance which I was told would cover any driver named on the insurance policy against a total loss; so i purchased it.

 

The problem I have is that the vehicle was recently subject to a total loss and Admiral insurance company have made a settlement offer of £9500. The amount I owe on the finance is around £10000 and original invoice price of the car was around £11500. Upon looking at my GAP insurance policy so that i can make a claim I have noticed that a claim can only be made if the GAP insurance policy holder is also the registered keeper of the vehicle; which I am not. My mother is the registered owner of both cars in our household so that they can be insured on her Admiral multicar policy.

 

At the time of purchase i was not made aware of this requirement and I am now surely not going to covered for the shortfall between the amount offered to me for the car and the amount I still owe to the finance company.

 

Any advise as to how I should approach this matter would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

 

Hi I work in insurance and the company I work for supplies gap insurance.

 

You are right in what you say you must be the registered owner and keeper of the car. In most cases this is fine but when this situation husband and wife, son and daughter etc arises we always but both names on the policy. That way there is a clear financial link.

 

You could contact the insurance company and the FSA as this should have been pointed out to you at the time you bought the policy.

 

If the dealership did not point this out this is a clear case of miss sell in that you have been sold a poliy that you could never benefit from.

 

But first I would contact the dealership as the very last thing that they or in fact any company want is to be investigated by the FSA. It costs a lot of money and takes a lot of time so they will want to help.

 

Let me know how you get on.

Edited by BigBen70
spelling mistake
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply

 

I have sent in my claim form to Cardif Pinnacle and am now waiting to see what they come back with. At the time of purchase i was not given the option of adding further names to the policy despite the dealer being aware of the situation but I was very happy with all other aspects of the sales process. To be honest I am amazed that insurance companies are able to sell GAP insurance and state that the policy holder must be the registered keeper of the vehicle without asking to see the registration document for said vehicle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply

 

I have sent in my claim form to Cardif Pinnacle and am now waiting to see what they come back with. At the time of purchase i was not given the option of adding further names to the policy despite the dealer being aware of the situation but I was very happy with all other aspects of the sales process. To be honest I am amazed that insurance companies are able to sell GAP insurance and state that the policy holder must be the registered keeper of the vehicle without asking to see the registration document for said vehicle.

 

Hi let me know how you get on. The insurance company would not want their polices to be sold like this and the dealership should know better. The dealership could have loads and loads of problems with this as if you make it difficult for them it really is an open and shut case of a miss sell.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi just spoken to a customer who was having the same problem.

 

The car finance is in the girlfriends name the Log book in his name. Won't say who who a very popular German car maker is saying the same thing.

 

Sad thing is he bought it from the dealership too.

 

How did you get on have you heard back from you gap insurance company yet?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...