Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA.  I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPCM to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and it is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week.
    • It probably deletes after a certain time. What a shame you did not check at the time. However I have no doubt that there was a PCN envelope under your windscreen wiper  as shown quite clearly on one of the photographs. . It would seem strange that it was placed there empty hence the reason I stated a second Notice was issued [though not necessarily sent. As I said in that letter to IPC that was not what the complaint was about and probably  IPC will ask about that at the same time if they accept you  going direct to IPC for the other matter. It is immaterial how many original PCNs were issued or not issued. You are able to show the two that you have from their sar one of which coincides with the one you received in the post and that is the one that does not agree with the date times of PoFA. Thus breaching not only the Act, but also the IPC  Code of Conduct and the ability of UKPCM to obtain data from the DVLA. So leave that part of the letter as good to go. However as it is as Dave [Thank you Dave!} pointed out that it is UKPCM and not UKPCI have amended the letter and posted it below.
    • Its based on 10% annual depreciation, divided by 52 weeks and then x the excess number of weeks that they have had the vehicle for, after the agreed initial 3 week repair.
    • LOL LOL LOL Don't need that many to deport a handful of volunteers - at best Home Office department processing Rwanda deportations told to cut jobs Exclusive: Illegal Migration Operations Command freezes recruitment and draws up redundancy plans, leaked documents show Cant have hundreds of well paid people in a department deporting a single volunteer when we have an upcoming election to lose now can we - VIPal drenched in riches and departments full of pals well paid for doing nowt will 'sadly soon be history - was rumored to in a text from a soon to be ex-minister texting in from one of his main jobs in a number of industries he will soon be unable to help.   Home Office department processing Rwanda deportations told to cut jobs | Immigration and asylum | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Exclusive: Illegal Migration Operations Command freezes recruitment and draws up redundancy plans, leaked documents show  
    • try it.... use recuva or file scavenger or glary utils
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA new claim question?


ancojo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4675 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

We had the phone call from the ESA department and now await the form to fill in.

 

I am a carer for my partner, she currently receives DLA MRC and HRM, she also claims IS for us as a family including our 7 year old child, from what i can gather its the disabilty side of IS which is the reason for DWP contacting her about changing her to ESA?

 

She has suffered from arthritis for 6 years now and also has Diabetes type 1 (Injects twice dailly) She is on numerous drugs and is constantly tired due to this. After reading up on ESA on the net she is worried that they will find her "Fit" for work as there seems to be people with serious health issues that are being forced into looking for work! No surprise there then! Some of the decision making i have read is amazingly bad!

 

After reading the teletext today it seems most are "Fit" for work! 1.3 million people tested since 2008 yet 1.22 million are fit to work! So basicaly the majority of disabled claimants are cheats! (In thier eyes) I gather most of these will be put onto the work related part of ESA if not JSA, but even this is an issue for me, my partner wont be going to no meeting to help her to find work even if it is only once per month!

 

There is no way she can go back to work, the arthritis is in her hands and feet and also affects her shoulders, her right hand is curling in and her feet ache all the time, yes she can walk but pain is there and if she walks to far then the pain obviously gets worse even when she sits down! She cant use a walking stick/aid due to her hands being sore if she does for to long so its catch 22, "Shes supposed to have bad feet but doesnt use a walking stick!" She has been on Humira for about a year and that has been quite good for her but shes got realy thin hair due to the methotrexate which she gets paranoid about!

 

I'm rambling now but i'm just trying to explain the situation.

 

Ok so back to my question, if they do decide she can sit at a desk and use a computer with one hand (Sarcasm) will they force her to go to the job centre or can i take over that role? As I'm her carer I could get a part time job but thats the issue, she needs me at home!

 

Any advice on how this all works or just general advice would be very much appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

ancojo

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is useful information in the 'stickies'. If you come out of this thread and scroll to the top of the benefit subforum, you will see a section highlighted in a horrible green colour. Click on sticky: esa medicals for information on how an ESA medical works.

 

In regard to her attending the Jobcentre, she would have to attend for any appointments made at the jobcentre. You can of course, go with her but you cannot go in her place.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply

 

The job centre interview is my main issue as she cannot work wereas i can aslong as i dont need to care for her (Which i do!) I used to be a carpenter/joiner but had to quit to take care of her, i would rather be earning £500+ per week than £55.55! Why dont i go back to it? Simply because neither she or i will accept that someone else should take care of her, i'm her partner its my duty to do so.

 

Is there not a way of arranging or reclaiming IS were i am the main claimer not her so that they look at me and not her? I just dont understand how if some doctor assessing her can say "Yep you can do work in certain areas" means she has to go to interviews that will be a total waste of time just because he/she thinks they may be some sort of job she can do!

 

Its so stupid that one department of government can say she is entitled to care (DLA) and another can say she can go to work! It just doesnt add up!

 

I'm assuming this may happen and to be honest it may turn out that they dont do any of the above, these feelings are due to reading so many people being forced into appeals because of IMO and many others, stupid and incorrect decisions! Its not the first time the powers that be have done this!

 

I suppose we will fill the form in and wait to see what the decision is.

 

One question, what chances are there that they will bypass a medical examination due to the form data we provide? Or is the medical exam almost certainly going to happen no matter what?

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really rusty on this, but couldn't you claim income support as a carer and your wife come of of incapacity before the switchover Maybe Erika could confirm if that's still a possibility.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DLA and ESA are two different benefits. Having care and /or mobility needs doesn't always stop you from working.

 

Some people won't get a medical. I do know someone who isn't in the exempt groups and managed to pass (or would that be fail?) on the basis of her ESA50.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...