Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
    • Apologies all for the late reply and info, i have been away with the Army. They have paid I accepted the offer on the 5th of May, and they paid on the 17th of May.
    • Hello everyone,   Just thought id post an update.   I've today now finally received a claim form from PRA Group. Bit annoying as the last payment to them would have August 2018 so was nearly over the line. I believe my only grounds for defence is that they haven't managed to produce a copy of the DN notice, however from some online research I managed to find some case law that stated they can use their systems screenshot to show proof of it being sent.   I know I have to respond back to their claim form and will do so online on moneyclaim, is now the time to pick up the phone to them and negotiate a deal?   Any advice as always is much appreciated it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help! Husband's 18year old mortgage debt landed on our doorstep today. I'm terrified.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4043 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 822
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It is a Council of Mortgage lenders guidance to its' members

(Halifax is a member) the 12 years is draconian in comparison

to other debt including 2nd charges which are not under seal

having a 6 year limitation.

So given all else is clear on payments or acknowledgments

then a ''polite'' letter to Halifax stating the facts as you know them,

is certainly worth considering.

I would like the opinion of others so I will bump the thread.:bump::bump::bump::bump: Urgent advice needed.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to both recorded delivery for tracking.

 

??????????

 

oh no, i understand, send to both Shoosmiths and Halifax and send both recorded!

 

but what should i say, I is but a girl (yeah right!anyone that danced the bump is no girl now!)

with limited, strike that, no Legalese.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Keep it simple, along the lines of..

 

Dear Curr or Madman,

 

Ref: account No.XXXXXXX

I refer to recent correspondence and to copies

of old communication, I has come to my notice that

the matter is now 7 years old, I am fully aware that

the Limitation on mortgages under seal is 12 years,

the Council of Mortgage Lenders has stated the mortgage

debts should not be pursued after 6 years and in this

case I will not be making any offer to pay or any payment

now and in the future.

Send copies to all parties by recorded delivery.

 

Brig.

 

And as long as you are young at heart what

matter is physical age, tell your other half he's

lucky to have you dealing with this.:madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I would suggest that he sends them is a polite but very personal letter setting out the circumstances he was in during the period. Then a reminder of the Council of Mortgage Lenders position that it is unfair to chase beyond 6 years. Make it clear that any further harassment of any kind will be defended and that a complaint will be made to both the CML and FOS in regard to Halifax, plus the SRA in relation to Shoosmiths if this matter is continued.

 

This is the CML bit below. From which you will see that the FSA and therefore the FOS will acccept the voluntary 6 years as being what Halifax should be complying with.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, a lender legally has 12 years in which to contact the borrower to begin the process of obtaining repayment of shortfall debt; this period is usually 5 years in Scotland. From 11 February 2000, lenders who are members of the CML have agreed voluntarily that they will not pursue a shortfall debt following a mortgage possession if they have not managed to contact the borrower within a period of six years from the date a property was taken into possession.

For more information on the voluntary agreement please see the consumer guide on Debt following mortgage possession.

Residential mortgages sold after the 31 October 2004 are regulated by the Financial Services Authority (FSA). The mortgages conduct of business (MCOB) regulations follow the standard set by the CML voluntary agreement, requiring lenders to begin proceedings to collect a shortfall debt within a period of six years.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might be a good idea actually to

point out what the consequences

of their actions really are in my opinion.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I did mean to include personal information about anything that is health related. Yes from you read you would think that companies like Halifax and Shoosmiths are heartless barstewards. But 1) they are still human and 2) if they are made aware of this, then the defence is that your OH was not in a fit state mentally to be issuing any letters/emails during the period when he had these problems. IF Halifax/Shoosmiths did think about pursuing this further, then they would be aware of these health issues and it might either moderate their behavior. Or even better, they might consider how this might affect them legally and not bother at all. I am pretty certain there are legal defences that can be deployed regarding mental incapacity in regard to communications that affect the limitations act. i.e if a judge is persuaded that your OH was not in a fit state of mind when issuing the letters/emails, they could well be ignored. Hence suggestion to make them aware now, if this defence can be used. ( I am not a legal expert, so you will need to look into this, if required. I am sure I have heard about such a defence, but I might be wrong )

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think you are confusing these 'people' with human beings...i know i couldn't do their job.

in my case, i escort a mentally and physically disabled boy to and from school each day for the minimum wage!

he's a sweetie and i love him...

job satisfaction 100%

remuneration...well at least i don't have to pay tax!

Link to post
Share on other sites

interesting point!!!

i have just noticed that this letter is just ' signed ' Shoosmiths whereas the previous letters were signed by a particular person at the firm...

(they are still advising my OH to ring that person though!)

just wondered if that means anything??? like they're giving up or something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Standard threatograms from a wide selection

of garbage templates the on ''human'' I use the term only

for convenience and to avoid slandering monkeys'':madgrin:

is the deluded office boy pressing the button on a machine.:jaw::madgrin:

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

can anyone decipher this list of debtor payments that was sent?/??

 

status is collect out with agent

headings across are

invoice no.

paid date

paid amount

commission amount

ams split amount

ams split commission amount

 

invoice no's are headings ranging from

dl&c plus month and year to

dl plus month and year

d28729 dl plus date and month

and finally conversion98

 

 

any boffs out there know what these hieroglyphs mean???????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, every companies internal

audit trails are like this, usually

totally meaningless to anyone

who does not work for them.

Your guess is as god as any ones,

we have discussed on CAG before regarding

these documents, and came to the conclusion

that they should be supplied with a key.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

done a little digging on the tinternet..........

 

"Debt CONVERSION is the exchange of debt - typically at a substantial discount - for equity, or counterpart domestic currency funds to be used to finance a particular project or policy. Debt for equity, debt for nature and debt for development swaps are all examples of debt conversion."

 

so each time, (13 times actually, once a month from Dec 96 to Dec 97 inclusive) this is recorded on the debtor payment list, as Conversion 98, (presumably the year) was the debt was sold on???? surely not (Shirley!) ???

 

DL, could be the abbreviation for past due or the initials of the original DCA which was Direct Legal Collections,....but where is the C???? da da daaaah!!:spy:

 

what is obvious that any payment made is eaten up with AMS commission and split amounts ....

of £3,370 paid (apparently) commission amount was £581,(approx) AMS split amount £780 and AMS split commission amount £124 (approx)

 

Ah well, i have spoken to the OH and he simply no recollection , this is a long period from Dec 96 to July 2000! he thinks he handed the keys back in 94, he thinks???!!!

 

Surely (shirley) someone on here holds a key to the abbreviations?

Edited by perplexedofdorset
Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a look at some docs this morning

from Welcome (SAR), Cap1 (SAR) and a couple of others

I did some 2-3 years ago all have similar sheets but

all different abbreviations and codes, none have

any explanation.

I future when doing a SAR for anyone I'm going to ''request ''

a key to these items.

Oi my names not Shirley, well not till gets dark.

Edited by BRIGADIER2JCS

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...