Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Probably to do with the Creditor accepting the reduced payments claim as part of the IVA. - Thats my guess anyway.  As for the mount outstanding... 60k is incredible and im pretty sure a DRO wouldnt cover that much even after the new legislation.    For you @Alfy - Please stay headstrong and stop worrying. My viewpoint on debt with debt collectors is simple. You are a figure on a spreadsheet loaded into a database for them to run a collection cycle through.  They dont care about emotions or your situation, they just care about paying off their shareholders and trying to turn a profit.  They use varying tactics to increase the pressure on you to the point where you will break. People then fall for this an either cave in to DCAs before doing their own due diligence on the debts that are purchased or turn to IVAs like you have.    They are better ways to handle this and Im glad you feel better after a good nights sleep - I hope you can keep it up. 
    • Good afternoon,    I am writing in reference to the retail dispute number ****, between myself and Newton Autos concerning the sale of a Toyota Avensis which has been found to have serious mechanical faults.    As explained previously the car was found to be faulty just six days after purchase. The car had numerous fault codes that appeared on the dash board and went into limp mode. This required assistance from the AA and this evidence has already been provided. The car continues to exhibit these faults and has been diagnosed as having faults with the fuel injectors which will require major mechanical investigation and repairs.    Newton Autos did not make me aware of any faults upon purchase of the vehicle and sold it as being in good condition.    Newton Autos have also refused to honour their responsibilities under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 which requires them to refund the customer if the goods are found to be faulty and not fit for purpose within 30 days of purchase.    Newton Autos also refused to accept my rejection of the vehicle and refused to refund the car and accept the return of the vehicle.    It is clear to me that the car is not fit for purpose as these mechanical faults occurred so soon after purchase and have been shown to be present by both the AA and an independent mechanic.   Kind regards
    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do mediation and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out     .
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4317 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've recently had a high court writ served against me for the following sums

Judgement Debt: £675.63 and Judgement Costs: £125.70

 

The debt is a private debt for goods supplied.

 

I've had a two official visits from Rossendales High Court enforcement. They have also visited my property 3 times in addition to this without knocking the door. On two occasions the bailiff sat outside my property for around 30 mins. I have not dealt directly with the bailiff David Williams. And have kept all windows and doors locked.

 

They tried to levy 2 vehicles on my drive which I use for self employment. In my view the levy doesn't stand.

 

They are asking for the following fees.

 

HCEO Fees:

 

Percentage of monies recovered: £22.53

Mileage: £13.19

Seizure Fee: £2

Enquiries: £4

Inventory/Valuation Fee: £47.76

Admin fee: £100

Financial Management Fee: £50

First Attendance Fee: £100

 

I have managed to secure the funds to pay the debt and the fees in full. However, I think the fees are excessive so have not called to make payment yet.

 

I have written to Rossendales lodging a formal complaint that the fees are excessive and that the levy is invalid. They refuse to acknowledge my complaints and that the vehicles are for self employment.

I have now contacted their trade association with the details.

 

All the while whilst this is going on it's affecting my business and my day to day life. I'm having to hide my vehicles and i'm worried about incurring further visits and costs not to mention the stress. All I want to do is get it cleared up but I don't want to be paying more than I need to as I'm struggling as it is.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

P

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your bailiff isnt certificated http://certificatedbailiffs.justice.gov.uk/CertificatedBailiffs/searchPublic.do?search=David so he may be just an HCEO. This means he cannot enter your property without permission.

 

I wouldnt take too much notice of the fees. Just dispute them.

 

The law prescribing fees chargeable by a High Court Enforcement Officer (HCEO) for collecting unpaid debts is Schedule 3 of Regulation 13 of The High Court Enforcement Officers Regulations 2004.

 

Where the sum due is £100 or less - 5%

Above £100 - 2.5%

Mileage Charges - 29.2p per mile Max £50

Seizure of goods - £2 per site

Signed Walking possession agreement fee - £3.25 a day

 

Its common practice for HCEOs to charge additional fees according to a list and pretend the debtor is liable to pay them. This is not true and you simply dont have the pay them at all.

 

There is the old HCEO's chestnut of adding fees described as "misc" or "miscellaneous". He is trying to use Section 12 of Schedule 3 of the regulations which actually reads:

 

"For any matter not otherwise provided for, such sum as a Master, district judge or costs judge may allow upon application."

 

This is essentially a blank cheque clause because it enables bailiffs to load his fees ad-infinitum then pretend an application has already been made to a Master or a district judge who has allowed the costs. HCEOs tend to do this retrospectively by charging as much as they think they can get away with then leave it up to you to challenge it afterwards, which is almost impossible to reclaim once you have paid it.

 

In short, dispute it, do not pay it and its a civil dispute between you and the HCEO. Additionally, you do not have to let them into your property so keep the chain on the door at all times and you are not obligated to speak with him.

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your response fork-it.

 

Yes, he is a HCEO

 

I have disputed the fees already in writing and they've argued that they are fair. Maybe I should mention to them about having to apply to the court for these. "For any matter not otherwise provided for, such sum as a Master, district judge or costs judge may allow upon application."

 

Should I ask for proof that they've done this or will the Enforcement Services Association do that for me as i've contacted them with details of the fees and case as a whole?

 

It still leaves me with the problem of having a writ served against me and me having to hide my cars. It's really starting to get on top of me as a close friend died yesterday and I just want it sorted so I can get on with my life.

 

I've got the money to pay for the judgement debt and costs in full but i've been advised that if I pay Rossendales they'll take the £400+ fees first still leaving the judgement debt and writ in place.

 

I've also got the money for the fees in full but really don't want to pay them or want them reduced to a reasonable level. I also don't want further fees added on top from further visits.

 

It's tying my head in knots. Any further advice would be greatly appreciated :)

Edited by funkyp
spelling and further info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your response fork-it.

 

Yes, he is a HCEO

 

I have disputed the fees already in writing and they've argued that they are fair. Maybe I should mention to them about having to apply to the court for these. "For any matter not otherwise provided for, such sum as a Master, district judge or costs judge may allow upon application." Not actually necessary

 

Should I ask for proof that they've done this or will the Enforcement Services Association do that for me as i've contacted them with details of the fees and case as a whole? Sorry but this is the wrong Trade Assoc - you need the HCEOA, but it's a pointless exercise as all the trade bodies are self funded by their membership.

 

It still leaves me with the problem of having a writ served against me and me having to hide my cars. It's really starting to get on top of me as a close friend died yesterday and I just want it sorted so I can get on with my life.

 

I've got the money to pay for the judgement debt and costs in full but i've been advised that if I pay Rossendales they'll take the £400+ fees first still leaving the judgement debt and writ in place. Have you tried the sneaky one - seeing if the original Claimant will accept the cash?

I've also got the money for the fees in full but really don't want to pay them or want them reduced to a reasonable level. I also don't want further fees added on top from further visits. The majority of the HCEO fees can be challenged.

It's tying my head in knots. Any further advice would be greatly appreciated :)

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt even bother saying anyting to him, just tell him they are too high and there is no court order requireing you to pay them. Remind him he commits an offence under Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1940 if he pretends to have a court order. The less you say the better.

 

I wouldnt bother writing to any trade associations, such as the Enforcement Services Association, they are private Ltd companies. Not industry regulators or statuutory bodies.

 

There is no such thing as a reasonable level, the law decides what the fees are. If he over charges you then dont pay him anything. Let him sue you.

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldnt even bother saying anyting to him, just tell him they are too high and there is no court order requireing you to pay them. Remind him he commits an offence under Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1940 if he pretends to have a court order. The less you say the better.

 

I wouldnt bother writing to any trade associations, such as the Enforcement Services Association, they are private Ltd companies. Not industry regulators or statuutory bodies.

 

There is no such thing as a reasonable level, the law decides what the fees are. If he over charges you then dont pay him anything. Let him sue you.

 

Again thanks so much for taking the time to reply. I completely agree with you regarding the fees and I dont want to pay them. However, this leaves me with the problem of settling the judgement debt. I DO want to pay this and the judgement costs now to get it cleared. I would imagine that if I try to pay the judgement off through rossendales they will use that money for their fees and the writ will not be removed. Is this a correct assumption? Ive tried to bypass them and pay the creditor directly but they wont accept it and tell me to do it through rossendales. Im very worried that if I leave it ill get a charge on my house. The creditor are taking me to court again in aug to claim for more fees and interest! They want £170 to stop there proceedings. As you can see they are making it very difficult and causing lots of stress for me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it that the order was ''forthwith'' with no alternative payment, so did you default on the

time span for payment, warrants of execution are not normally immediately applied for.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can of course submit 2 forms to the Court.

 

1 - N244 and apply for a Stay of Execution against the HCEO using the grounds that you cannot afford his fees + pending determination of your Variation application.

 

2 - N245 and apply for a Varaiation Order letting you pay at an affordable rate you can afford, you must submit I&E for this.

 

If you are on a low wage or certain benefits you may not have to pay the Court Fees - see Form EX160 for details.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I agree with the advice you've been given here so far and think that if you do have the money for the judgment debt then try to get it paid directly to the Creditor and get a receipt from them. Is it a business or private individual that you owe? If it is a business you might try dealing directly with the accounts department - they very rarely turn down the chance to take a payment, especially if it is past due - often the people in these departments are targeted on collections so will take the money and ask few questions, but really important to get a receipt! Even if it is an individual see if they will take the payment from you.

 

Beyond that work out what you agree with regarding the HCEO fees - pay that and then write to them to confirm that the judgment debt has been settled in full, along with the fees that you believe they are due accourding to the fee schedule and that the balance remains in dispute.

 

Much as I despise the heavy handed approach of the HCEOs and creative accounting abilities when it comes to fees that Enron would have been proud of, you may want to consider trying to settle with them once you have paid the judgment debt and the element of fees that they are legitimately entitled to. If it is causing you grief now then you need to be prepared for the possibility of a protracted battle with them which you should balance against a figure today that will restore your peace of mind.

 

I speak from the experience of a 3 year battle with HCE but then I am a stubborn git at the best of times with an unhealthy interest in the intricacies of law...

 

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...