Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
    • Car maker takes a hit from weakening demand and price war in the world's largest electric vehicle market.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Will this claim be allowed?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4692 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is a bit of an unusual insurance contents claim and quite embarrassing for me. I will be as brief as possible even though it is quite a complicated story. I had a lot of jewellery items stolen but it wasn't a burglary as the thief was actually inside my house and broke out rather than in.

 

My son who does not live with me because of his lifestyle choices came to my home a few weeks ago begging for a bed as he was homeless. It was raining and he was drenched and threatening suicide if I didn't let him in. I weakened and allowed him to sleep on the sofa for a couple of nights. He was never left alone in the house but one morning when I asked him to leave he became abusive and attacked me. I was terrified because I had cancer last year and underwent a serious operation not long ago and was really afraid I would be seriously hurt. I ran out of the house and locked the door behind me to contain him whilst I phoned the police from the patio. Just before they arrived 20 minutes later, he escaped through the bedroom window.

 

I was very shaken and upset and fearful of him returning so I went to stay with my brother for the weekend. When I returned home I discovered that whilst I was outside phoning the police he had stolen all my jewellery and some other items. I called the police who came out and took a statement and a list of missing items. I was very upset as he had not only taken my things but also some stuff my late mother left to me which as well as being valuable was priceless due to the great sentimental value.

 

To cut a long story short he gave himself up and has been to court. He is now serving a custodial sentence and I have also taken out a restraining order so that he cannot come near me again for the foreseeable future.

 

I made a claim with my insurance company Privilege (Platinum) and because I now can't find receipts for anything as most of the jewellery is over 20 years old I asked the shop where quite a few of the items were purchased to do me an estimate for the missing pieces. It came to just under £10,000 so loss adjusters UK Assistance have been appointed to 'help' with the claim and are coming out to visit next week. I have been informed that they will look at the security of the property and I understand that if my home isn't classed as secure then the claim could be disallowed. As the house wasn't broken into would this still apply? I am getting really stressed out and stress is the last thing I need.

 

I am wondering if there is any point in me searching high and low for photo's which show me wearing the jewellery (not that the photo's will be clear enough to identify the pieces) and other evidence that confirm ownership of the items stolen. I would have thought that the very fact he had pleaded guilty to the thefts would have been sufficient proof. I am still feeling very distressed about all this and I don't want to put myself out if they are going to say that because it was my son who stole the items I don't have a claim.

 

Advice please

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you are fortunate that you have an RBS Insurance company handling the claim. They are normally pretty fair and will seek to help as far as they can.

 

In regard to security, if your policy had a requirement for specfic locks, then yes it is relevant to the claim. Although it was not a break-in as such, the policy would have been provided on the basis of you having adequate security. If you had £10k worth of jewellery, depending on the other valuables in the home, I would have been surprised if there was not a minimum security requirement.

 

The security required would be either 5 lever mortice deadlocks or multi-point locking (UPVC) to exit doors and key operated locks to accessible windows.

 

In these situations, just be as helpful as you can and hopefully they will settle the claim, as best as they can within the terms of your policy. At this point I don't see the merit in debating whether your son being family and having been given access to the home, is relevant to declining the claim. Insurers should look at each claim based on its own merits. I would hope that they would look at what happened and be flexible in their approach. Someone I know who had a son with a drug habit, did a very similar thing and they claimed on their Insurance, but that was many years ago.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also they normally require anything over the value of say £500 to be specifically listed and noted, in particular jewelry.

Also worth photographing all valuble items with descriptions.

Other than that they would be relying on your word only that they existed at all.

Also it was not a burglary as their was no break in!

I would examine your policy carefully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do have 5 lever locks on the only door which opens although the door itself is not in a very good condition. The front door is stuck shut and there is no key for it. I have locks on the windows except for one which I was going to have replaced before I became ill. I received a letter just after I made the claim which informed me that when the policy was due for renewal next year I would be required to have the approved locks before the renewal could take place. Does this then mean that I'm ok until renewal time? I'm sure there was something in the small print about family members so I just hope they will see that I had no alternative other than to leave him in the property albeit briefly. I think drugs must be involved in this case, I can't think of any other reason for his behaviour. Thanks for your input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest I had no idea that my jewellery would be worth so much. It has come as quite a surprise. I only knew the rough cost of the items when they were purchased many of them over 20 years ago. I didn't realise that jewellery had gone up so much in value. They are classifying it as theft and not burglary now that I've explained the circumstances. I just don't want to stress myself out more than necessary by searching futilely for decent photo's and instruction manuals and things if they are just going to tell me I don't have a claim that's all. I know this sounds odd but I have had so much upset and stress over the last few months that I don't think I can take any more and would rather just cancel the claim if this is going to be the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do have 5 lever locks on the only door which opens although the door itself is not in a very good condition. The front door is stuck shut and there is no key for it. I have locks on the windows except for one which I was going to have replaced before I became ill. I received a letter just after I made the claim which informed me that when the policy was due for renewal next year I would be required to have the approved locks before the renewal could take place. Does this then mean that I'm ok until renewal time? I'm sure there was something in the small print about family members so I just hope they will see that I had no alternative other than to leave him in the property albeit briefly. I think drugs must be involved in this case, I can't think of any other reason for his behaviour. Thanks for your input.

 

Yes if they wrote to you following the claim saying that a minimum level of security was required from renewal, then at the time of loss there does not appear to have been such a requirement. You need to explain the situation with the jewellery and not knowing the value, as had the Insurers known about the value, they may have applied security requirements to the policy.

 

Yes there is something in the wording about family members which is meant to avoid claims where someone within the family normally resident at the Insured address, commits a criminal act. BUT this is where you need to provide full details of the situation and hope that they take it into account. I think they should, but I cannot guarantee it 100%.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for taking the time out to try and put my mind at rest. I will use your suggestions and hope for the best. If anyone can think of anything else I'd be grateful.. Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Burglary is effectively Theft or attempted theft + a trespass. Trespass = entry to a building or PART of a building. It is fairly obvious you restricted his access to parts of your home. He therefore entered those parts he should not have and stole the items. You say he was prosecuted and found guilty. That shows the level of disquiet you have against your own son, any insurance company should consider theft of your property in these circumstances as a legitimate claim. The loss adjusters will want to ensure that the property you say was stolen did in fact exist and so all photos showing these items will be useful. They may even get an expert in jewellry in to assess the value from the photos. They will even look at YOU, YOUR LIFE STYLE, YOUR OTHER POSSESSIONS to make a judgement on quality of possessions to see if the value is consistent with other goods you own. Having anything to convince them of the value is good.

 

Sorry to hear of you illness, it is the last thing you need. Without being too morbid about it, I hope you have made a suitable will putting this errant son in his place.... we have family just like this, so I know where you are coming from!!

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not good news. Most of my jewellery was not bought by me but by my ex husband and the partner I had after him. We were quite well off back in the day but when he left me in 1996 he hadn't paid the mortgage for months and I had to sell the house and buy something much smaller. I have been unable to maintain the property very well since then as I never had any maintenance from him and my job doesn't pay that much. Everything I had of any value was in my jewellery box and he took everything apart from three rings I was wearing and some worthless costume jewellery. I have found some photo's but I don't think they show the items clearly enough to be able to determine the value. I also have a couple of photo's of my mother wearing her pearls and her wedding ring but again not large enough to be able to see that they are cultured and not imitation. I don't think I have a leg to stand on do I? Why can't they just believe that I am unlikely to further stress myself by trying an insurance [problem] when I'm a civil servant and I have just been very ill?

 

As regards the matter of restricting his entry into certain parts of my home I do have a lock on my bedroom door but at the time it was unlocked as I was getting ready for work when the assault took place.

 

I am going to change my will but at the moment I just can't face it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stop worrying... they probably will believe you... you have the culprit... they could interview him!!

 

If you have a will, you may have mentioned some of the items in there???

Edited by papasmurf1cx
Link to post
Share on other sites

True and he did plead guilty to the thefts so surely that should convince them. Actually no, there isn't anything specifically listed. Just that all my assets should be split equally between him and his sister.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4692 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...