Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What we need to see is all the original paperwork  That would include the pre contract information and the original HP Agreement  Post it up and I will have a good look over it at the weekend  It really hangs on the wording as to whether it’s a scrapage adjustment /discount on the price of the car( that is how some schemes worked) Every manufacturer had their own version  Have you sent VW a SAR?
    • Wrong as usual Jugg    Did Michael Cohen Commit Perjury In The Trump Trial? WWW.ZEROHEDGE.COM ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero Michael Cohen. He still has one day of cross examination ahead of him on Thursday. With the government resting after Cohen’s cross examination, I believe that an honest judge would have no alternative but to grant a motion for a directed verdict and end the case before it goes to the jury. Judge Juan Merchan will now have to give the full measure of his commitment to the rule of law. Given the failure to support the elements of any crime or even to establish the falsity of recording payments as legal expenses, this trial seemed to stumble through the motions of a trial. Michael Cohen was only the final proof of a raw political exercise. For critics, some of Cohen’s answers appear clearly false or misleading. Like their star witness, the prosecutors have shown that they simply do not take the law very seriously when there is an advantage to be taken.
    • So to sum up. 1.  You & your friend did the right thing on 28 December and are in the right legally. 2.  You are in the early stages of the threatening letter cycle.  We've seen these letters quite literally over 10,000 times.  For the moment your friend has nothing to worry about. 3.  No-one will turn up at your friend's door. 4.  If months down the line this got to court, you would win.  It's blatant disability discrimination.  Some time back I looked through the results of Excel v Caggers court cases, well we won 85% of the time, and you would be 100& certain to win. But this is the bit that you won't like ... 5.  Excel don't care that they are legally in the wrong.  They want your money.  They will go on and on with their letters hoping you'll give in. 6.  They are also the most litigious of the private parking companies and it's perfectly possible, months hence, that they will take your friend to court.  You have to be prepared for this.  They would lose.  But they don't care about the losses since, sadly, presumably so many people are afraid of court and so give in and pay.  7.  We will of course support you all the way!
    • Hi, Just updating that I'll be submitting the SJPN shortly this evening electronically.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pay Day Loan Problem


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4667 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Continue with your offer, stating that this is the maximum you can guarantee for them, and put the money to one side so when they eventually DO agree you can say "here is XXX being the £40 payments from XXX to XXX, proving that I have been able to meet this commitment" (been there and done it to a PDL myself, who were miffed at first and demanded rest of payment, told them to learn to read properly!)

 

You can do a basic I&E rather than a detailed one, as follows

 

Priority Debts

Mortgage/Rent

Council Tax

Gas/Electric/Water

TV Licence

 

Essential (daily living) debts

Food

Travel costs (including car costs)

Basic clothing

 

Non priority debts

Bank overdraft

etc

 

The shortened version is

 

Income (do NOT list benefits as they are NOT to be used for paying non-priority debts)

Priority Debts, Essential Debts added together

Non Priority debts added together

 

Resulting amount left for xxx creditors not included in non-priority debts

 

Remind them that only a court can order a full I&E and that you are complaining to

 

http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk

http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk (for the OFT)

 

Keep us posted on progress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

If you go to the National Debtline site they have a very good Personal Budget Sheet, worth filling in to see where the black holes are in your finances.

 

Perhaps you can click on my star and give me a reputation comment...

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Im in a repayment plan with txt-loan, one more payment to go, free of them next month, then ill start dealing with payday uk, who are very annoying.

 

Txt loan details are below, as far as payday uk go, stop sending them emails, ignore them, in the end theyll send you a letter saying theyll accept 75% of what you owe, then theyll say theyll accept a plan, itll be months from now, so dont panic, deal with the companies that want to deal with you, payday uk will come round when you ignore them long enough

 

 

Receiver - TxtLoan Ltd

Account number - 42028948

Sort code - 402103

Ref: your loan ID

Link to post
Share on other sites

About 5 months after repeatedly ignoring my generous 100 pounds a month offer , telling me to call them etc etc, they pass the debt on to a DCA called Keys Whitlock, which is not external, its just them in more threatening mode, after a few letters from them, including a "we have come to visit you and you werent at home but we will come again" postcard, which looks like its been dropped in the letter box until you notice the first class stamp on it. They then send a letter literally begging for any money I can afford to give them, my debt is 600, they dont want to go to court for that, so theyll accept a repayment plan. Unless you owe them thousands, do the same.

We all accept that we owe the money and want to pay it back, but the bullying has to stop . :):violin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They wont take you to court for that, and unlike capital finance one and others, they wont add charges onto your debt. Theyll keep sending you emails telling you your credit rating will be affected(like I care about my credit rating at this stage) and that the loan will be passed on to an agent etc etc, a few months later Keys Whitlock will send you similar letters, and asking for a part payment or a repayment plan....This is when you phone them up and set it up. Until then, try and pay off one of the other loans, so that a few months down the line you can afford a repayment plan to pduk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your debt is actually the original loan amount plus one months interest, NOTHING MORE, you do not need to pay idiots like Keys Whitlock, and need to report that 'postcard' to the OFT and Trading Standards, they are not supposed to do things like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just had an email from Mark Harrington at PTPD saying he emailed me last week and he hasn't had a response. Well I've just re-read the email from last week and it says they have added £59 charges on, but there won't be anymore interest etc, they can't set up a pay plan for me and after 28th July it will be passed to an external agency, and to contact them if I have any further questions. Not sure what todays email is about then!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default notice is invalid. Section 87 of the CCA Act comes into play with payday loan companies. If they take you to court they will be laughed at. You have been trying to negotiate with them and they have ignored you.

 

Complain now to

 

http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk for Office of Fair Trading

http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk for Trading Standards

 

If you don't complain about them now then I can give no further help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Agghhh please help re CRS - they have just called and he has made me cry :( I'm shaking at my desk. They are the worst company to deal with ever! has anyone had any dealings? He was so rude and wouldn't listen to anything I have to say. He says they have a perfect right to contact my work, and had the gall to say I could pay them what I owe and re-loan again with PTPD!!!!They won't set up a payment plan, and have said they will pass it back to PTPD in 28 days who will take me to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Report them to the OFT and Trading Standards, they are well out of order calling you at work.

 

http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk

http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk for the OFT

 

PTPD cannot take somebody to court as they are offshore based in Malta and that can be used against them, as can using agencies such as CRS who are not able to do anything except intimidate and insult you

 

You need to complain in the strongest possible terms about this and the way they make you feel. Complain about both companies separately and that will be a step in the right direction.

 

The OFT guidelines say they MUST accept offers of part payment and if they do not then the OFT will start investigating them and revoke their consumer credit licence (they can do that to the DCA as well.

 

If you don't complain now and loudly to the authorities nothing will be done and you will have wasted your time posting on the site.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...