Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capital One


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4735 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone, I am a new bod on here and replied to a thread on Fredrickson/Bryan Carter discussion which seems to be a biggie with loads of people! Am glad I am not alone and grateful for any help offered. Have been getting hassle from FI for a few weeks now regarding a cc with Cap1 who I owe 253 quid to and now they have started ringing my work fone (which is in a v.public office and anyone could answer!). Any advice on how to deal with these people (loosest sense of the term!) as they are starting to do my head in! So far this morning: 3 txts, 4 fone calls and 2 voicemails and still counting............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to them stating that they must not call you at work (recorded delivery) keep a copy of the letter for the OFT complaint if they fail to stop.

How old is this debt and when did you make the last payment.

Have you claimed back charges.

Was there PPI attached.

 

To obtain accurate details of the charges you could send them a Subject Access Request. Once you have this information lodge a counter claim.

 

If you come back with the answers, someone will point you in the right direction.

Edited by Crocdoc
Spelling error
Link to post
Share on other sites

You also need to send them the Harassment by Telephone letter. Make sure you keep as much evidence of calls and texts etc... as you can. I know this is hard at work, though keep a record of the date and time of those phone calls. Anything on your mobile will be stored, so don't delete call history or texts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, and thank you! So the general consensus is that it is not on for them to phone me at work, does this apply if it is a recorded message "this is an urgent message, please contact fredrickson international...." basically the same spiel as on a txt msg? Is this still considered harrassment? Also, I dont know if there was PPI attached to it and the card was issued in 2002 and the last time a payment was made was in December last year through a DMP, which is now cancelled. I am getting a new DMP at the end of the month through CCCS but want to try and keep everyone at bay until then! So stressed out, its not even funny!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tingy, thanks again. Am new to all this harrassment lark and apart from changing all my phone numbers (not possible in work!) cant think of anything to do until the new dmp starts!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have particularly dreadul "on-hold" music at work, you could always just put the caller on hold for the rest of the day/until they get bored and hang up :lol:

 

Seriously though, they are not permitted to ring you at work, and they are also being beyond reasonable with the level of contact so definitely send the harassment letter.

 

If you are sorting this out with the DMP then just let them wait. If you do speak on the 'phone, just say "everything in writing" and leave it at that.

 

Sarah

Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday, and all is well!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gelfling,

 

I see you have already been getting a lot of help here. :-)

 

Write to Freds:

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Account No.

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to your company or any company you claim to represent.

 

Please advise me if this alleged debt has been assigned to your company, or if you are acting as collection agents for Capital One. If the alleged debt has been assigned to your company, please send a copy of the assignment.

 

I have reason to believe that the original alleged credit agreement may contain unfair terms, and not be compliant with the Regulations of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I therefore require to see a copy of the original alleged credit agreement bearing my signature. I enclose a postal order for £1.00 as payment for the copy of the agreement, and not as a payment to the account.

 

If you and/or Capital One cannot supply a copy of the original allleged signed credit agreement you are obliged to inform me of this fact. Please note that I do not expect you to send me the current terms and conditions. I require to see a copy of the actual signed agreement.

 

Then continue with the telephone harassment stuff as Tingy has suggested.

 

That will give them something to do until the end of the month, and they should leave you alone until the dmp comes into effect.

 

Do you have all your statements? I never took out PPI anywhere, so I don't know if this shows as a separate payment on statements. Someone here will know the answer to that one. If you had PPI you can claim it back, and other charges. That could reduce the amount outstanding, or you may get something back from them. As Crocdoc says, you can get this if you do a SAR, but that will cost you £10, so if you have all your statements that will save a tenner!

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all, am feeling a bit more positive now. Could play a song down the line with my mobile but that may upset the boss lol!!!!! Will do everything you suggest. Have just fielded the 6th call of the day and the guy at least had the grace to sound a "bit" embarrassed!!!!!! Hmph! Will keep you posted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am glad you are feeling better.

 

I think you should send them the harassment bit of the letter by email and tell them to lay off immediately or you will report them to OFT. Clearly you don't want them back again tomorrow.

 

I've just found their email address on another thread: [email protected].

 

Hope that helps.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning everyone! I think my luck has flown out of the window! Had a letter from Freds waiting on me when I went home yesterday stating that they are now acting for of the payday loans (txt loan) that I defaulted on! How much blood do they want??? Followed advice and emailed them the harassment letter but got an automated email back saying that all account queries have to go through the fredpay website, any advice on this? Much appreciated!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd send off a CCA letter to them regarding these in the first instance. I suspect they will have no problem doing this, but that's fine. Depending on their reply to that we'll take it from there. You need at least Proof of Postage - some prefer recorded delivery, though from a court's point of view as long as you have proof of postage, receipt is assumed.

 

Dear Sir

 

Ref:− Your letter of XX December 2010. Your Ref xxxxxxxxxxxx

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to your company

I refer to your letter dated dd/mm/yy and now formally request, under the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (specifically regulations 5 and 6) and the Office of Fair Trading Guidance on debt collection that you confirm whether you currently hold or have ever held a properly Executed Credit Agreement pertaining to the above account and if so please forward a copy to me by return.

If YOU DO NOT have a signed, properly executed Consumer Credit Act Agreement pertaining to myself, then I require written confirmation by return (CPUTR 2008 reg 5 and 6).

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act, creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with such a request.

Also, since you are a Debt Collection Agency, I would also ask that you supply a signed true copy of the executed deed of assignment for the above referenced agreement. This is an obligation, whether you are the original creditor or not, under section 189 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

Non-compliance with my request is a criminal offence under the above Act and will result in a report being submitted to the relevant statutory authorities.

In summary, I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE THIS DEBT AND THEREFORE REQUIRE YOU TO SUBSTANTIATE THIS BY PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTATION BEFORE I CORRESPOND FURTHER :

1.True copy of original credit agreement

2.Statement of account

3.Copy of the executed deed of assignment from the original creditor

4.Fair Processing Notice.

As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the customer is totally unenforceable under the CCA and therefore is a complete defence to any court claim that is issued.

Take note at this stage, that any legal action you may contemplate will be both vigorously defended and contested.

Further to the above, please ensure that any contact by yourselves or any agent or associated company or organisation is made in writing only to the above address or by e-mail. telephone callsclip_image001.gif and personal visits will not be accepted and viewed as harassment.

As this account is now in dispute, I would also draw your attention to The Banking Codeclip_image001.gif section 13.6:-

We may give information to the Credit Reference Agencies about personal debts you owe us if:

·The Amount Owed is Not in Dispute.

The Office of Fair Trading provided a Code of Guidance that is in relation to Debt Collection: OFT 664 Response to consultation paper and final guidance on unfair business practices dated July 2003

Deceptive and/or Unfair Methods-

2.8 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:-

k. Not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt.

If you continue in your pursuance of this account I will have no other alternative than to report you to both The Information Commissioner and The Office of Fair Trading (OFT).

Furthermore, I shall submit a Consumer Credit Act 1974 complaint to the OFT upon the basis that you have failed to comply with the OFT's direction of 5 April 2006 and are therefore not a 'fit and proper person' to hold a consumer credit licence under the 1974 Act.

 

If you do not understand what this means then I would recommend you seek appropriate independent legal advice.

Yours faithfully

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tingy and DD, thanks. Am in the process of sending letters from the CCCS to all my creditors regarding the dmp, when I send them this, do you think that will keep them off my back for a while?:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

What your creditors will do is read what you've put and then send you their response. It will give you a short break at least!

 

DD Can't remember where I found it, sadly I can't take credit for writing it, though I may or may not have changed it. I like it too! Wish I'd noticed all that code path as to where I store it though - I can't edit it out now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...