Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Include that in your witness statement along with that letter as an exhibit.
    • Yup, well so far they have lied to me about responding to a CCA,  are threatening me with a default notice that they don't have, produced a knocked up version of my NOA, sent me 29 pages of spew for an agreement. No wonder they pay 5 p in the pound for that crap.
    • Paragraph 2. I think there should be further down and also you should make the point that the payment to was made unilaterally and without the imposition of any conditions. Paragraph 3 – this is unnecessary because you are not claiming as an entitled third-party. This worries me because it makes me feel that you haven't fully read around because this is a paragraph which you would include where you were suing EVRi as a beneficial third party because you had actually made your contract with Packlink or some other broker. I think you need to revisit and do some more reading. I'm afraid I have a sense that you have simply copied this from somebody else's witness statement without understanding that it wasn't necessary. Please can you post the amended draft. Other than the suggestions above, it looks okay – but let's see it again for a further appraisal. In terms of the evidence, parties bundle, I think it might be an idea to start off with the correspondence with EVRi and then go onto the other evidence. You will have to amend the index page accordingly. You could shorten this bit. Take 19 is pretty well blank and you may as well miss it out also, there seems to be some repetition of emails and the email chain. I think will be worth going through and getting rid of duplicates if you can. 49 pages is a bit long and it would be a good idea to try and reduce the number. I have a feeling that 50 pages as the County Court limit anyway. The judge will be happier with you if the bundle is smaller. Maybe you could reduce the size of some of the images or messages et cetera. You have got several messages which straddle onto a second page so that things like sign off information and standard confidentiality information become orphans. A bit of manipulation and they could be joined to their parents I think. Page 31 as an example. So is page 19. You may only be up to shorten the whole thing by 56 pages – but I think it would be a good idea. 56 pages is, after all, 10%. If you can do more then so much the better
    • Investment by Dutch brewing giant will create 1,000 new jobs and reopen dozens of closed pubsView the full article
    • Qantas agrees to pay millions to settle lawsuit accusing it of selling tickets to cancelled flights.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCJ - copies of loan agreement


atl1433
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4724 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, my partner has a ccj on a loan which is now with Close Brothers (it has been with about 3 companies prior to CB)

but we can't get a copy of the original loan agreement from CB to make sure it is enforceable.

 

We requested a copy 12mths ago and despite sending 2 recorded delivery letters to CB etc we have had no response at all.

 

As we got no response, we stopped paying the repayments and they took us to court (via their solicitor, Banner Jones)

and had the repayments adjusted by the courts (after a statement of earnings they dropped the amount).

 

We don't receive statements or any correspondence from CB and would like to see a copy of the loan agreement.

 

Do we have to 'set aside' the ccj before we can see a copy of the loan agreement or is there any legal obligation for CB to send us a copy?

 

How do we get them to send us a copy?

 

It feels like they have the courts on their side and we just have to keep paying for something that we don't know

that they even have considering there have been numerous other companies who owned the debt prior to CB.

 

Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, when the solicitors took us to court we explained that we had defaulted on the payments as we followed the correct proceedure in requesting a copy of the loan agreement (sending £10 etc) but received no response from CB. However, the courts made no reference to this and proceeded to demand a statement of earnings etc. Do we need to send a new sar CB or can we do anything to enforce the request from last year? what if they don't respond again? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

the CCJ will in all effect null the actual need for them to hold a CCA

 

can i ask the reasons why you need to see it

if you are not disputing the debt, i see no point as a CCJ is now in place.

 

however as suggested

SAR the OC its £10.

 

that might be useful if you think the sum they have gotten against you was incorrect

 

after all - there might be charges and PPI you can reclaim?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply. Sorry, my partner now tells me this was a credit card debt originally with Naaffi in the Army (a card that could be only used in Naaffi shops), then sold to Arrow (in the form of a credit card with monthly statements) and finally Close Brothers. Are Close Brother not obliged to send statements etc at least annually as we have no idea how much the debt is now and what interest he is paying etc? Sorry again for mis-information!

Link to post
Share on other sites

they most certainly should be sending something....

 

is there any chance you can gives us some dates on all this....

 

and were you aware of the CCJ hearing taking place?

 

something smells here.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He first took the Naafi card with the Army in 1987 and then it changed to a credit card with Arrow and they did issue statements (we have one dated Nov 88)., and finally it has ended up with Close Brothers (not sure of the date of this butit is certainly prior to March 09). My partner got in a mess with his finances and went to Baines & Ernst to sort everything out, and it was then that the CCJ happened (March 09) and B&E handled it for him as he didn't know what to do. I got involved in August 09 by writing to CB to ask for a copy of the agreement, a full statement of account, a signed true copy of the deed of assignment etc (I used the standard letter on CAG) and I enclosed £10 PO. We had no reply so on 2nd Sept I wrote again (by rec. del) advising that they had failed to reply to my request and therefore the account entered default and we stopped paying the monthly payments. In Dec 09 we received notification that it was going to court and we needed to attach a statment of earnings etc. In my reply to the court I explained that CB had failed to respond to my requests, and I therefore believed the account to be in dispute and I could stop the payments - I got no response to this and the court ordered him to make lesser monthly payments.

The correspondence we have had has been from Banner Jones Solicitors regarding going back to court in Dec 09 and from that day onwards we have received nothing at all from Close Brothers.

Your advice would be appreciated as I am worried that if interest is being applied, the debt could be huge.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think then yes you should contact the court [prob northampton bulk?] and

ask for a copy of the ccj

 

was there parchance a period of 6yrs when he did nothing with it?

 

something def smells here, as arrows are renound for fleecing people on sb'ed debts

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...